• You may have to login or register before you can post and view our exclusive members only forums.
    To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Team for Saturday

Status
Not open for further replies.
there is a difference between flying into tackles and snuffing out danger before it begins. watch the lucas video to see what I'm talking about.
 
I'd go for POWER

-----------------------------Jones---------------------------
----------Coates---------Skrtel--------------Agger---------
Glenjo-------------------------------------------------Downing
--------------Kuyt--------Gerrard----Shelvey-------------
---------------------Carroll---------Suarez--------------------

Everton don't play with too much width but will try and unsettle us with set-pieces, so our 3 strong CB's will cope with Cahill, Jelavic, Fellaini etc.

When we have set pieces they won't have enough "Big men" to mark Coates, Agger, Skrtel & Carroll (also Johnson, Gerrard, Kuyt and Suarez who are all decent in the air).

This team selection would win 2-0 with headed goals from Skrtel & Kuyt.
 
Gerrard and Shelvey in midfield, you're kidding right.
United's midfield recently has been.....

Valencia------Carrick-----Scholes-----Giggs

Where is their tough-tackling midfield? If our defence is strong enough we can get away with Gerrard, Kuyt and Glenjo and Downing covering them.
 
You don't need tough tacklers but you do need players who know how to play central midfield so Shelvey and Gerrard would be madness.
 
United's midfield recently has been.....

Valencia------Carrick-----Scholes-----Giggs

Where is their tough-tackling midfield? If our defence is strong enough we can get away with Gerrard, Kuyt and Glenjo and Downing covering them.


carrick and scholes have disipline and would maintain their position providing a shield for the defense whilst at the same time spraying the ball to the wide players who would do the damage. they are extremely good in possession and rearly conceed possession cheaply. that's pretty much the opposite of gerrard who would venture forwards to create chances and also attempt ambitious passes that would more often than not would result in us losing possession. I'll stop short of saying gerrard is 'poor' in central midfield, I'll instead say he is ten times better in other areas of the pitch so why play him there (Centre midfield), you're blunting his effectiveness and making us wasteful into the bargin.
 
....................................Reina

Johnson...........Skrtel.................Agger............Enrique

........................Henderson..........Spearing

Gerrard............................................................Maxi

.....................................Suarez

.....................................Carroll
 
Three at the back isn't a bad idea, but this would be better:

-----------------------------Jones---------------------------
----------Coates---------Skrtel--------------Agger---------
Glenjo------------------------------------------------Enrique
-------------Spearing-----Gerrard----Shelvey-------------
-------------------Carroll---------Suarez--------------------
 
....................................?

Johnson...........Skrtel.................Agger............Enrique

........................Gerrard..........Spearing

Bellamy...........................................................Maxi

.....................................Suarez

.....................................Carroll
 
Have to say I don't think I've ever seen so many line-up permutations in a pre-match thread before. Just goes to show that no-one really knows what our best team is.
 
...
.................................Reina
Jones

Johnson...........Skrtel.................Agger............Enrique

........................Henderson..........Spearing

Gerrard............................................................Maxi
Suarez
.....................................Suarez
Shelvey

.....................................Carroll

I like the idea of Gerrard on the right. His crossing against Villa was superb.
 
Three at the back isn't a bad idea, but this would be better:

-----------------------------Jones---------------------------
----------Coates---------Skrtel--------------Agger---------
Glenjo------------------------------------------------Enrique
-------------Spearing-----Gerrard----Shelvey-------------
-------------------Carroll---------Suarez--------------------
I really like the look of that
 
What it should be

Jones
Johnson
Agger
Skittles
Enrique
Gerrard
Spearing
Maxi
Bellers
Suarez
Carroll

What it will be
Jones
Johnson
Agger
Skittles
Enrique
Gerrard
Spearing
Henderson
Downing
Kuyt
Suarez
 
I'd like to see;

----------------------jones------------------------
johnson-----agger----skrtel---------enrique
--------------spearing----henderson---------
-----------------gerrard----------------------------
-----suarez------carroll-------maxi-------------

but I suspect we'll see;

----------------------jones------------------------
johnson-----carra------skrtel---------agger
-----spearing----gerrard------downing------
-----suarez------carroll-------kuyt-------------
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom