For the love of God. I have a 5-a-side game t win.
Evil can be related to the harm it does to the brain of a sentient being. That harm is related to the neurons in the beings brain. You can count and order the neurons. You can get a number for evil.
Sturridge
- Thread starter LeTallecWiz
- Start date
- Latest activity Latest activity:
- Status
For the love of God. I have a 5-a-side game t win.
Evil can be related to the harm it does to the brain of a sentient being. That harm is related to the neurons in the beings brain. You can count and order the neurons. You can get a number for evil.
that is a fucking ridiculous statement, dantes. i know you're not the only scientist who thinks this way but it really is fucking retarded.
it's a circular argument.
It is not an argument yet. Its just the answer to your question about evil being abstract and relatable to mathematics
Rosco gone missing again when you need him.
you have no idea what you're talking about.
Of course not. I thought you were going somewhere with the evil / imperfection thing so gave you the better of the two answers. And now you're asking me about the worst of the two answers.
So I agree, I have no idea what it is you are talking about
the same is true for imperfection. it's a circular argument.
satan: someone who harms your braincells in a mathematical way.
Brilliant post.
Imperfection would be related to entropy, which is a number. You seem to have a long winded philosophical definition of perfection.
Btw, I won my game 10-4 but didnt score. So I was pissed off. The premier league team were short players so I stepped in. We were still a player short. I scored 5, we won 15-9. I didnt do some stupid dance or attribute my ruthless display to some non existent god. Thats how I roll
and you have a mathematical defintion of it. which is why the argument is circular. you obviously haven't noticed that this is the problem with abstractions.
you seriously need to stop this dantes. your science education hasn't given you the skills to deal with this stuff.
What makes you think there is anything else apart from mathematics? When you can give me a philosophical proof for the hand you are waving in front of you being an actual physical or even metaphysical object then let me know.
Your arguments are predicated on something that is fundamentally pure bullshit. This is why I'm gnostic because I'm talking about the actual truth and reality. Not an imaginary fairytale.
Your arguments are predicated on something that is fundamentally pure bullshit. This is why I'm gnostic because I'm talking about the actual truth and reality. Not an imaginary fairytale.
if you are talking about actual truth and reality (i'm assuming you mean objective reality) then you really shouldn't be bothering with concepts like 'evil' and 'perfection' because they are purely abstractions of the human mind. make your mind up because you're a mess.
The mess started because you asked if science is the study of evil or imperfection..
It is a method to study reality, be it subjective or objective. So I took the most charitable definition of those words in order to give you an answer. So what you are saying now is basically that you asked me a stupid question for some reason.
It is a method to study reality, be it subjective or objective. So I took the most charitable definition of those words in order to give you an answer. So what you are saying now is basically that you asked me a stupid question for some reason.
i asked you a question based on the fact that you were apparently a gnostic. you're fucking stupid.
nothing. you'd still be a dickhead, lewis.
makes no fucking difference.
Ha ha do threads ever stay on topic in here?
The former means I genuinely know. The latter is a group of deluded people who base their knowledge on pure bullshit.
the latter based their knowledge largely on plato. it doesn't surprise me to hear a scientist say that plato was simply 'pure bullshit'.
Yes. I think when I am this close like two posts away from explaining the entire universe, @Rosco will lock the thread for the sake of the forum.
No, Plato is a genius and shows me how scientists should think. I read a lot of his work and tried to rip off bits of his brain. Just like Newton's work was also based on pure bullshit. But they were humble and making honest progress. Gnostics not so much.
you've just wikied them 5 minutes ago and now you're an authority on the matter?
- Status
