• You may have to login or register before you can post and view our exclusive members only forums.
    To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Sterling to Man City.. Maybe Arsenal..

Status
Not open for further replies.
If there's £50 mill.on the table I suspect the owners will take it. That money will be needed if we're going to spend big this summer.
 
Ninja: same here. If - IF - it's well spent, that money could ultimately serve us better than a player who's going to hold us to ransom every season, but there's no doubt it's a risky one.
 
Sell Sterling and replace him with Depay would be okay, but we would need to sign a shit hot striker for it to be good, and no, not Danny Ings.
 
If there's £50 mill.on the table I suspect the owners will take it. That money will be needed if we're going to spend big this summer.

Sure. Take the money. He can sit on their bench for two years when they buy other more established players, then come back for a third of that.
 
Off to Man city.. (if you believe this mornings papers)

50 million...

http://www.independent.ie/sport/soc...ng-bid-as-liverpool-eye-benteke-31187038.html



I think I'd probably take a swap of sorts - sterling out, Depay and Benteke in.
I think those two would probably provide more of an immediate impact to our team than holding onto a currently 'good' player incase one day he becomes brilliant. And by that time he'll probably be wanting a million pounds a day.
 
"Selling Sterling would give Brendan Rodgers the financial firepower to move for Aston Villa striker Benteke, whose manager, Tim Sherwood, says will cost around £30m."

Andy Carroll mark 2. The truth is, we won't spend the money well. I'd rather have the player, than the money.
 
Hurricane is a one man team at Spurs and after what happened to them after selling Bale they would probably ask 200 million for Kane.
 
Don't forget that QPR have a 25% sell-on clause in his deal with us, so we need the world to go a bit madder still to get the funds we require.
 
Maybe we should pull a Southampton and tell City how the clause isn't our problem and they have to pay it.
 
A journalist described selling Sterling as "the nuclear option" the other month and that remains the case in my view.

We will struggle to replace him and improve with the funds we get so there is really no incentive to sell him... unless the contract situation really is so bad that we feel like we have no choice. Still, I'd be inclined to play hardball and keep him for two years on his low contract.
 
Or.... given the little cunt has 2 yrs left on his contract- we continue to pay him £35k a week for the length of it and make him work for his place.

If he's that fucking good, we'll either get a massive offer - or we'll take a tribunal fee.

There's no free transfer here
 
A journalist described selling Sterling as "the nuclear option" the other month and that remains the case in my view.

We will struggle to replace him and improve with the funds we get so there is really no incentive to sell him... unless the contract situation really is so bad that we feel like we have no choice. Still, I'd be inclined to play hardball and keep him for two years on his low contract.

We already have his replacement in Ibe. Ibe can go on to be better than sterling IMO.
 
My opinion is somewhat tainted by his home installed barbershop because he doesn't like giving selfies to the fans. He's a fucking talented bellend.
 
If there's £50 mill.on the table I suspect the owners will take it. That money will be needed if we're going to spend big this summer.
It's a funny one isn't it. I'd take it too. I have high hopes for next season actually. I have faith in Lallana, Lazar and Can (who already has come good imo) Ibe will be blooded in nicely. Ship out Mario, Lambert, Johnson. Free up some wages with Gerrard off as well. Get Sturridge fit and add a Benteke or similar striker and it's all good.

In theory at least - I'm an optimist though so I would say that.
 
Presumably they'll want their new manager to commit to such a transfer. I haven't heard of any done deal. It all sounds like agent talk.
 
The papers today are apparently saying Brendan invited Sterling over to his gaff last night for a heart-to-heart (presumably Sterling's agent wasn't on the guest list). If the reports are correct, Sterling was going to be told the club will not sell him.

Still leaves the question over where the money's coming from for any substantial transfer activity this summer.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom