Basically swapping him for benteke then.
It's only mooted that we were holding out for £50m, we've got near enough that much. I don't think the situation was as simple as £50m or nothing, he clearly can't stay and rot, however good that sounds on paper.
I'm not sure it's about agendas Mark.
We started off the summer by saying that Sterling wasn't for sale, then seemingly compromised to say we wouldn't consider anything less than 50m, and now seem to be accepting a bid which, what ever figure you want to believe, is less than 50m.
We starred down City & Sterling - but we blinked first.
John Cross. Fucking hell what a bellend.
I don't want thropies anyway.
Not that I know what they are, but they sound painful.
£45m+£5m is still a good fee. Like I say, I'd prefer us not to be selling, but he's made the situation barely manageable. For a 20yr old on the back of about 2yrs at this level and one that's capable of moments of brilliance, but equally capable of a run of average form, it's well inflated.
This is only a reported fee anyway, let's see what happens.
Guardian reporting that it's 40m + 4m in add-ons.
thats caving in, if that's the agreed fee
I'm not sure it's about agendas Mark.
We started off the summer by saying that Sterling wasn't for sale, then seemingly compromised to say we wouldn't consider anything less than 50m, and now seem to be accepting a bid which, what ever figure you want to believe, is less than 50m.
We starred down City & Sterling - but we blinked first.
I hope Flanno is fit for the first game against City.
Was on Talkshite saying we're incapable of winning thropies and that Sterling isnt driven by money or wages.
Riiiiiight.
They were all cordial with him. Apparently he's quite well liked & knows many people's names & will always say hello, unlike some players (he wouldn't say who).Did he/she tell you what they said to him?