not a bad looking fella either, no homo.
*Sahin might stay*
- Thread starter SummerOnions
- Start date
- Latest activity Latest activity:
- Status
No indeed quite clean cut, and does not look like the bottom pinching type at all - sorry bad Turkish generalisation slur there *although they all do apparently
We can only hope mate, for now since we have not seen him play, actually.
Nope, I'm not the only one, or nope, you don't do it?
Agreed. One of the long list I banned from our wedding. Hated when it came out. still do.
Sorry, was not clear. Sahin has not played for our team yet, competitively that is.
But will Messi come? If he does, I will ask why and will he fit into our team or not also.
OK, Neymar then. My point is you don't have to watch a player play in a red shirt to know whether he is going to be a good acquisition or not. Example, many people were sing the praises of Joe Allen and he looks good so far. I realise there's always going to be a Morientes factor but a former league winning captain and German footballer of the year doesn't seem to be that. I think Y1 is being a bit of negative ninny. Again !
Won't hear me arguing. I can't wait to see him play for us because he'll smash it
I have had some hope dashed too often last season. I was not sure of Joe Allen but kudos to him and Rodgers, we have a good one going there. That is why I choose not to believe until I see it with my own eyes that Sahin is not injured still or may has lost something during his recovery so much so he is now surplus to Real Madrid, at least for this year.
Liam Tomkins @liam_tomkins
So#LFC have first refusal on Nuri Sahin should Madrid sell, and the initial loan fee was only £1.6m. Shrewd.
So
Is this legit?? Cracking deal if true!
Yeah- or Spurs rock in with their new special deal with Madrid and then Madrid sell to City.
We always get bummed by those cnuts!
Who'd have thought eh?
This is what happens when you switch from yepping to noping. It's "nope, I'm not the only one".
"Feels the same as when you have to explain a joke and it becoming unfunny"
I thought first refusal means they set a price for a player and if we meet it, he is sold. If we refuse to meet it, then it becomes an auction. So if they set a price of 20 million and we accept, City's 30 million are irrelevant.
But could they ask for 100 million?
Or are they bound not to accept offers lower than that after?
I thought it was a case of City offering 30 million, then us having to match it.
There is no definitive answer to what first refusal is.
Hence why I doubt it ever really exists in a contract, not in that wording anyway.
Hence why I doubt it ever really exists in a contract, not in that wording anyway.
- Status
