Why? Like I said, no one has really tackled the issue that our better players got battered at home, I don't really get the uproar for him changing the team and ultimately fairing better and actually taking something from the game. It seems like he didn't do what was fashionable and it got peoples backs up. The players he brought in were equally expensive investments, more so in some cases, so it was hardly a case of him weakening us, he brought in expensive internationals who had, at some point, to show they could do something, a few of them did quite well and a few fringe players showed there's depth in the squad.
It's amazing that you, Macca and a few others seem to think that's I'm trolling because I don't buy the bollocks being posted about fashionable, what the papers would have wanted, line ups. Rodgers didn't have to go there and change it, but he felt it was necessary to shut up shop and then try to open up, we kept it tight and the gameplan nearly worked. There have been enough comments of late about him not having an alternative tack, that he only knows how to play one way, etc. He changes it and there's mass uproar. Whatever he does he's wrong then isn't he and as Jexy said, people may aswell throw in the towel and at least have the balls to say what they really think, because he's clearly losing faith already 5 months after catapulting us to 2nd and raising our ambitions early.
YNWA by arse.
