• You may have to login or register before you can post and view our exclusive members only forums.
    To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Mohamed Salah

Status
Not open for further replies.
It's fucking wrong. Mouriniho won't play him. These clubs buy all the players to just stop others.

That said, I honestly wasn't impressed by his youtube clip. If you can't impress on youtube...
 
I don't know anything about him either but he sure improved greatly in the last week or so
 
I always find it a little annoying when posts get distilled into ridiculously simplified versions of what they were actually saying and the poster called a simpleton in addition.

You realise that I'm not actually advocating a return to spunking tonnes of cash on sub-par players, right? I mean, as far as I can recall I wasn't advocating that in anything I've ever written.

What is disturbing me, and I think not unreasonably so, is the lack of an obvious strategy with regards to transfers. We don't want to overspend on players - fine, so what are we going to do instead? Because all the teams we are competing with for players can offer more money in both transfers and wages, so how do we intend on still signing top quality players?

That's what bothers me - the lack of an alternative plan - based on what I've seen so far, incidentally, rather than my assuming anything by default. Why is it safe to say we have alternative targets? What are you basing this on?
This is precisely what I'm talking about. You presume that we have no coherent strategy, simply because it's not immediately apparent to you. Your first assumption is that we must be bumbling idiots. It doesn't seem to have occurred to you that there may be things going on above your head that you're not aware of. Or that, as a multi-million pound enterprise, we may have formulated plans and targets beyond what you read in the newspapers.

I don't pretend to know any more than you do. I just think that there is plenty of evidence of our strategy, not to mention a team of highly qualified people overseeing its implementation.
 
Do people think it's in our power to tie up deals quickly ?

We have to wait for the player to sign, and no agent is going to advise his client to sign without knowing what the market is for that player. That's why few deals get done early.

We may well have fucked up here (I have to admit my surprise at how many people are sure he's either shite or a big loss) but I just think his agent played the game and got his client the best offer using us as the stalking horse.

I love it when you post like this...just saying.
 
This is precisely what I'm talking about. You presume that we have no coherent strategy, simply because it's not immediately apparent to you. Your first assumption is that we must be bumbling idiots. It doesn't seem to have occurred to you that there may be things going on above your head that you're not aware of. Or that, as a multi-million pound enterprise, we may have formulated plans and targets beyond what you read in the newspapers.

I don't pretend to know any more than you do. I just think that there is plenty of evidence of our strategy, not to mention a team of highly qualified people overseeing its implementation.

I'm not presuming anything, I'm saying what it looks like to me. I never mentioned the phrase idiots, used the term bumbling, so stop accusing me of assuming things and then make assumptions about what I'm saying.

It's not apparent to me what our transfer strategy is, based on what I've seen so far. So because I don't know everything going on inside the football club, I shouldn't say anything? Should I not guess what the line up is going to be either because I can't see inside the manager's mind? This is a forum to discuss things, and this is my opinion. Of course it's not based on fact, otherwise what would be the point in my engaging with discussion about it? I'd be quite happy if I read a decent argument that we do have a decent strategy, because I mind then change my might and be slightly more optimistic about the direction of the club, which I would very much like to be.
 
Rodgers on Talkshite this morning saying that the Chelsea deal for Salah has not been done yet implying watch this space
Wishful thinking at best, but him saying that does imply we were very interested, which is the circumstance I wouldn't be happy about. I'm not gutted about missing out on Salah, due to my ignorance of him as a player, however I am very gutted if were missing out on our preferred targets.
 
Not if its true that we cooled our interest when a fee of 16 mill was agreed. He's not worth that.
 
Rodgers also said that he was only after first team players, if none came available at the price we are prepared to pay we'll use who we have, he was clear he didn't want to buy squad players.

Unfortunately I think we need one in the shape of a dm to cover for Lucas.

We currently have three fit central midfielders for three positions, none of whom play naturally at the back of the three.
 
jC9m5pg.jpg
 
Chelsea wouldn't have announced they'd agree a deal if it wasn't all but a formality. Spurs didn't even announce the Willian deal, and he was hanging out at there training ground.
 
Mourinho has now been asked about Salah.
"It was a surprise for us that Juan was leaving, we were not prepared to try to bring a player into replace him, so everything happened very, very fast, so we had to see which options would be good for us.
"We had to start from zero with Salah, we didn't know his agent, we knew nothing.
"We started with the club, reached an agreement, everything is signed and done, subject to the medical and the player's desire to join us or not.
"Now we know he wants it and he is very happy to come and we have to finalise it."
When will the medical be?
"We have to travel to meet him to have the medical in Switzerland and then only after that we can finalise the paperwork."
 
Now he's been asked about Liverpool's interest in Salah:
"I don't know what Liverpool did before us. We have reached an agreement with Basel."
What does Mourinho like about Salah?
"He has adaptability to play right, left or behind the striker. He's fast, creative, enthusiastic and his personality looks like he is ready to work on the pitch and if he comes he will have a similar process to Willian where he takes a couple of months to adapt."
 
How confident is Mourinho of finalising the deal for Salah?
"We are confident. We have an agreement with the club and we know the player wants to come - he told me personally. But now it's terms and the medical which he has to pass, so hopefully he comes."
 
The one thing we lack from that transfer committee is someone who actually knows the short cuts to get deals done. Bellamy talks of how his last move to us was almost hijacked before Kenny called his agent and scared him shitless. If Ayre can't or won't get tough with these people they might as well let Rodgers do it, but this is getting embarrassing.
 
The impression I get is that Ayre couldn't get tough if his very life depended on it. He just doesn't seem to be made that way. It needn't matter as long as there's someone else around who's capable of it and has the necessary clout, but is there in the current set-up?
 
The impression I get is that Ayre couldn't get tough if his very life depended on it. He just doesn't seem to be made that way. It needn't matter as long as there's someone else around who's capable of it and has the necessary clout, but is there in the current set-up?

i duno, he does have a harley, i dont see why he'd have one of them unless he was a tough guy, unless he was overcompensating but im sure he wouldnt do that........
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom