Fuck him anyways I'm going for a swim
Not a Sminkyshorts fan eh?Go for a really long one. Try to swim to the horizon.
He wouldn't be in it, along with Lucas.I was desperate to know "what's our best 11 now" after we'd signed this chap too.
I don't know anything about this guy, have never seen him play once in my life, but I know I'm DEFINITELY REALLY ANGRY AND STUFF.
This is precisely what I'm talking about. You presume that we have no coherent strategy, simply because it's not immediately apparent to you. Your first assumption is that we must be bumbling idiots. It doesn't seem to have occurred to you that there may be things going on above your head that you're not aware of. Or that, as a multi-million pound enterprise, we may have formulated plans and targets beyond what you read in the newspapers.I always find it a little annoying when posts get distilled into ridiculously simplified versions of what they were actually saying and the poster called a simpleton in addition.
You realise that I'm not actually advocating a return to spunking tonnes of cash on sub-par players, right? I mean, as far as I can recall I wasn't advocating that in anything I've ever written.
What is disturbing me, and I think not unreasonably so, is the lack of an obvious strategy with regards to transfers. We don't want to overspend on players - fine, so what are we going to do instead? Because all the teams we are competing with for players can offer more money in both transfers and wages, so how do we intend on still signing top quality players?
That's what bothers me - the lack of an alternative plan - based on what I've seen so far, incidentally, rather than my assuming anything by default. Why is it safe to say we have alternative targets? What are you basing this on?
Do people think it's in our power to tie up deals quickly ?
We have to wait for the player to sign, and no agent is going to advise his client to sign without knowing what the market is for that player. That's why few deals get done early.
We may well have fucked up here (I have to admit my surprise at how many people are sure he's either shite or a big loss) but I just think his agent played the game and got his client the best offer using us as the stalking horse.
This is precisely what I'm talking about. You presume that we have no coherent strategy, simply because it's not immediately apparent to you. Your first assumption is that we must be bumbling idiots. It doesn't seem to have occurred to you that there may be things going on above your head that you're not aware of. Or that, as a multi-million pound enterprise, we may have formulated plans and targets beyond what you read in the newspapers.
I don't pretend to know any more than you do. I just think that there is plenty of evidence of our strategy, not to mention a team of highly qualified people overseeing its implementation.
Wishful thinking at best, but him saying that does imply we were very interested, which is the circumstance I wouldn't be happy about. I'm not gutted about missing out on Salah, due to my ignorance of him as a player, however I am very gutted if were missing out on our preferred targets.Rodgers on Talkshite this morning saying that the Chelsea deal for Salah has not been done yet implying watch this space
Not if its true that we cooled our interest when a fee of 16 mill was agreed. He's not worth that.
One last twist?
I think that 15/16m figure was €
The impression I get is that Ayre couldn't get tough if his very life depended on it. He just doesn't seem to be made that way. It needn't matter as long as there's someone else around who's capable of it and has the necessary clout, but is there in the current set-up?