• You may have to login or register before you can post and view our exclusive members only forums.
    To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Midweek Games

Status
Not open for further replies.
[quote author=ibromurph link=topic=39675.msg1083432#msg1083432 date=1270597992]
Ryan, all the best forward players in the world have pace.
[/quote]

Do they all?

Drogba
Ibrahimovic
Higuain
RVN
Forlan
Arshavin

All top forwards, none of them pacy. I'm not saying it's not a bonus, cos when you look at Torres, Ronaldo, etc etc it's a definite bonus, but you don't have to be lightning to make a difference.

Walcott wouldn't be a professional footballer if he wasn't quick.
 
Barca miss Pique when he's not there. He starts most moves and all passing from the back stems out of him. Milito is rubbish on the ball, and Marquez too old and ponderous.

Bit of an over-reliance on Xavi to do everything tonight, and Arsenal were - for the most part- able to restrict him to sideways stuff.
 
[quote author=Ryan link=topic=39675.msg1083434#msg1083434 date=1270598207]
[quote author=ibromurph link=topic=39675.msg1083432#msg1083432 date=1270597992]
Ryan, all the best forward players in the world have pace.
[/quote]

Do they all?

Drogba - yes
Ibrahimovic - yes
Higuain - yes
RVN - (in his prime) yes
Forlan (in his prime) yes, though i don't count him as one of the best despite his goals in Spain.
Arshavin - yes
[/quote]

Clearly we have a different understanding of the word 'pace'. Apparently,

You - anyone slower than 10.5s over 100m is slow.

Me - anyone who he is quick and has a good burst of acceleration over 10-20m. So I count players like Tevez, Gerrard and Van Persie as quick.

Anyhow regardless of semantics, in my opinion, it's clear we DO need more 'quick (or slow)' players like Arshavin, like Higuain, like Drogba.. and less paraplegic players like Kuyt, Lucas and Insua (who take an age to move themselves and the ball).

I must mention it was almost absurd seeing Stephen Carr easily outpace Insua the other day. Now THAT's fecking slow.
 
[quote author=ibromurph link=topic=39675.msg1083440#msg1083440 date=1270598621]
[quote author=Ryan link=topic=39675.msg1083434#msg1083434 date=1270598207]
[quote author=ibromurph link=topic=39675.msg1083432#msg1083432 date=1270597992]
Ryan, all the best forward players in the world have pace.
[/quote]

Do they all?

Drogba - yes
Ibrahimovic - yes
Higuain - yes
RVN - (in his prime) yes
Forlan (in his prime) yes, though i don't count him as one of the best despite his goals in Spain.
Arshavin - yes
[/quote]

Clearly we have a different understanding of the word 'pace'. Apparently,

You - anyone slower than 10.5s over 100m is slow.

Me - anyone who he is quick and has a good burst of acceleration over 10-20m. So I count players like Tevez, Gerrard and Van Persie as quick.. and players like Kuyt, Lucas and Insua as slow.

I must mention it was almost absurd seeing Stephen Carr easily outpace Insua the other day. Now THAT's fecking slow.
[/quote]

Possibly.

I just don't see pace as being as vital a commodity as others. Most top clubs have 2, sometimes 3 (rarely more) pacy players in their side. We've got that too. Our problem for most of the season is that those two or three have been out injured, and combining that with slow, ponderous football has exacerbated the problem.

We had the same team last year (swop Alonso for Lucas) and teams couldn't live with us.

We don't necessarily need faster players, just better ones.
 
[quote author=Ryan link=topic=39675.msg1083441#msg1083441 date=1270598853]
Possibly.

I just don't see pace as being as vital a commodity as others. Most top clubs have 2, sometimes 3 (rarely more) pacy players in their side. We've got that too. Our problem for most of the season is that those two or three have been out injured, and combining that with slow, ponderous football has exacerbated the problem.

We had the same team last year (swop Alonso for Lucas) and teams couldn't live with us.

We don't necessarily need faster players, just better ones.
[/quote]

It goes without saying we need better ones.

But we will never win the league with a slow defence (unable to cope with counterattacks), a slow midfield (unable to get up and down the field to support both defence/offence) and a slow forward line (unable to initiate counter attacks).

Part of the reason United have been so dominant is that they have dynamic players in all areas: Defence, Midfield and Attack.

Ferdinand and Vidic are quick enough to cope with counterattacks. Evra too.

Fletcher gives the legs in midfield, with Nani and Valencia providing excellent quick outlets.

And Rooney upfront presenting an ever present danger.

I think we're getting closer to that with Johnson and Agger at the back, T&G upfront, but in midfield, we're sorely lacking that dynamism with Kuyt and Lucas often slowing down our play immensly.
 
[quote author=ibromurph link=topic=39675.msg1083446#msg1083446 date=1270599360]
[quote author=Ryan link=topic=39675.msg1083441#msg1083441 date=1270598853]
Possibly.

I just don't see pace as being as vital a commodity as others. Most top clubs have 2, sometimes 3 (rarely more) pacy players in their side. We've got that too. Our problem for most of the season is that those two or three have been out injured, and combining that with slow, ponderous football has exacerbated the problem.

We had the same team last year (swop Alonso for Lucas) and teams couldn't live with us.

We don't necessarily need faster players, just better ones.
[/quote]

It goes without saying we need better ones.

But we will never win the league with a slow defence (unable to cope with counterattacks), a slow midfield (unable to get up and down the field to support both defence/offence) and a slow forward line (unable to initiate counter attacks).

Part of the reason United have been so dominant is that they have dynamic players in all areas: Defence, Midfield and Attack.

Ferdinand and Vidic are quick enough to cope with counterattacks. Evra too.

Fletcher gives the legs in midfield, with Nani and Valencia providing excellent quick outlets.

And Rooney upfront presenting an ever present danger.

I think we're getting closer to that with Johnson and Agger at the back, T&G upfront, but in midfield, we're sorely lacking that dynamism with Kuyt and Lucas often slowing down our play immensly.
[/quote]

Murph, with our best team out - we don't have a slow defence, midfield or attack. One or two positions could be improved upon (left-back, centre midfield, a high quality wide man) but in Gerrard, Torres, Glenjo, Skrtel, Agger etc we have as much pace as any other team in the league.

For the one millionth fucking time - pace of ball and movement of players is more important than pace of player.

Every top team in the World, every single one - Barca tonight if you even fucking noticed - have no more than 3 or 4 fast players in their team. WHICH WE DO TOO. United play with a midfield of Park, Carrick, Scholes and Fletcher sometimes for Christ's sake.

Sorry for being a cunt about this by the way.
 
[quote author=Ryan link=topic=39675.msg1083441#msg1083441 date=1270598853]
[quote author=ibromurph link=topic=39675.msg1083440#msg1083440 date=1270598621]
[quote author=Ryan link=topic=39675.msg1083434#msg1083434 date=1270598207]
[quote author=ibromurph link=topic=39675.msg1083432#msg1083432 date=1270597992]
Ryan, all the best forward players in the world have pace.
[/quote]

Do they all?

Drogba - yes
Ibrahimovic - yes
Higuain - yes
RVN - (in his prime) yes
Forlan (in his prime) yes, though i don't count him as one of the best despite his goals in Spain.
Arshavin - yes
[/quote]

Clearly we have a different understanding of the word 'pace'. Apparently,

You - anyone slower than 10.5s over 100m is slow.

Me - anyone who he is quick and has a good burst of acceleration over 10-20m. So I count players like Tevez, Gerrard and Van Persie as quick.. and players like Kuyt, Lucas and Insua as slow.

I must mention it was almost absurd seeing Stephen Carr easily outpace Insua the other day. Now THAT's fecking slow.
[/quote]

Possibly.

I just don't see pace as being as vital a commodity as others. Most top clubs have 2, sometimes 3 (rarely more) pacy players in their side. We've got that too. Our problem for most of the season is that those two or three have been out injured, and combining that with slow, ponderous football has exacerbated the problem.

We had the same team last year (swop Alonso for Lucas) and teams couldn't live with us.

We don't necessarily need faster players, just better ones.
[/quote]

I don't think its pace either, its willingness to do everything as a unit and putting pressure as high up the field as humanly possible. attack and defend as a team, this makes passing so easy as there are so many passing options. I've thought for a long time the reason so many of our wide players haven't been as effective as you'd hope is because they are given the ball and exepected to do too much by themselves while the defense hangs back in case we are hit on the break.

its way too cautious, that why when we get after teams we start leaking goals for fun because the defense are asked to do too much because the attacking are up field, the 4-4 with chelsea being a good example.
so basically attacking football is having player confident on the ball to be able to release the ball with one touch rather than controlling and then passing, having lots of stamina so you can move into space and also pressure the opposition high up the field.
pace helps but it isn't the be all and end all unless your plan is to hit teams on the break.
 
Future prediction alert:

Brendan will take the above, rehash it and in a few weeks time quote me as saying "we need more slow players."

Guarantee.
 
[quote author=Ryan link=topic=39675.msg1083452#msg1083452 date=1270600123]
Future prediction alert:

Brendan will take the above, rehash it and in a few weeks time quote me as saying "we need more slow players."

Guarantee.
[/quote]


why do you even care?
 
[quote author=spider-neil link=topic=39675.msg1083451#msg1083451 date=1270600086]
[quote author=Ryan link=topic=39675.msg1083441#msg1083441 date=1270598853]
[quote author=ibromurph link=topic=39675.msg1083440#msg1083440 date=1270598621]
[quote author=Ryan link=topic=39675.msg1083434#msg1083434 date=1270598207]
[quote author=ibromurph link=topic=39675.msg1083432#msg1083432 date=1270597992]
Ryan, all the best forward players in the world have pace.
[/quote]

Do they all?

Drogba - yes
Ibrahimovic - yes
Higuain - yes
RVN - (in his prime) yes
Forlan (in his prime) yes, though i don't count him as one of the best despite his goals in Spain.
Arshavin - yes
[/quote]

Clearly we have a different understanding of the word 'pace'. Apparently,

You - anyone slower than 10.5s over 100m is slow.

Me - anyone who he is quick and has a good burst of acceleration over 10-20m. So I count players like Tevez, Gerrard and Van Persie as quick.. and players like Kuyt, Lucas and Insua as slow.

I must mention it was almost absurd seeing Stephen Carr easily outpace Insua the other day. Now THAT's fecking slow.
[/quote]

Possibly.

I just don't see pace as being as vital a commodity as others. Most top clubs have 2, sometimes 3 (rarely more) pacy players in their side. We've got that too. Our problem for most of the season is that those two or three have been out injured, and combining that with slow, ponderous football has exacerbated the problem.

We had the same team last year (swop Alonso for Lucas) and teams couldn't live with us.

We don't necessarily need faster players, just better ones.
[/quote]

I don't think its pace either, its willingness to do everything as a unit and putting pressure as high up the field as humanly possible. attack and defend as a team, this makes passing so easy as there are so many passing options. I've thought for a long time the reason so many of our wide players haven't been as effective as you'd hope is because they are given the ball and exepected to do too much by themselves while the defense hangs back in case we are hit on the break.

its way too cautious, that why when we get after teams we start leaking goals for fun because the defense are asked to do too much because the attacking are up field, the 4-4 with chelsea being a good example.
so basically attacking football is having player confident on the ball to be able to release the ball with one touch rather than controlling and then passing, having lots of stamina so you can move into space and also pressure the opposition high up the field.
pace helps but it isn't the be all and end all unless your plan is to hit teams on the break.
[/quote]

Well it depends on who you're playing against and who you've got in your team Spidey.

If you've got your best team available and are at home against most sidexs, then yes - I'm all for pressing in the furthest third.
 
[quote author=Ryan link=topic=39675.msg1083454#msg1083454 date=1270600221]
[quote author=spider-neil link=topic=39675.msg1083451#msg1083451 date=1270600086]
[quote author=Ryan link=topic=39675.msg1083441#msg1083441 date=1270598853]
[quote author=ibromurph link=topic=39675.msg1083440#msg1083440 date=1270598621]
[quote author=Ryan link=topic=39675.msg1083434#msg1083434 date=1270598207]
[quote author=ibromurph link=topic=39675.msg1083432#msg1083432 date=1270597992]
Ryan, all the best forward players in the world have pace.
[/quote]

Do they all?

Drogba - yes
Ibrahimovic - yes
Higuain - yes
RVN - (in his prime) yes
Forlan (in his prime) yes, though i don't count him as one of the best despite his goals in Spain.
Arshavin - yes
[/quote]

Clearly we have a different understanding of the word 'pace'. Apparently,

You - anyone slower than 10.5s over 100m is slow.

Me - anyone who he is quick and has a good burst of acceleration over 10-20m. So I count players like Tevez, Gerrard and Van Persie as quick.. and players like Kuyt, Lucas and Insua as slow.

I must mention it was almost absurd seeing Stephen Carr easily outpace Insua the other day. Now THAT's fecking slow.
[/quote]

Possibly.

I just don't see pace as being as vital a commodity as others. Most top clubs have 2, sometimes 3 (rarely more) pacy players in their side. We've got that too. Our problem for most of the season is that those two or three have been out injured, and combining that with slow, ponderous football has exacerbated the problem.

We had the same team last year (swop Alonso for Lucas) and teams couldn't live with us.

We don't necessarily need faster players, just better ones.
[/quote]

I don't think its pace either, its willingness to do everything as a unit and putting pressure as high up the field as humanly possible. attack and defend as a team, this makes passing so easy as there are so many passing options. I've thought for a long time the reason so many of our wide players haven't been as effective as you'd hope is because they are given the ball and exepected to do too much by themselves while the defense hangs back in case we are hit on the break.

its way too cautious, that why when we get after teams we start leaking goals for fun because the defense are asked to do too much because the attacking are up field, the 4-4 with chelsea being a good example.
so basically attacking football is having player confident on the ball to be able to release the ball with one touch rather than controlling and then passing, having lots of stamina so you can move into space and also pressure the opposition high up the field.
pace helps but it isn't the be all and end all unless your plan is to hit teams on the break.
[/quote]

Well it depends on who you're playing against and who you've got in your team Spidey.

If you've got your best team available and are at home against most sidexs, then yes - I'm all for pressing in the furthest third.
[/quote]

I don't have a problem with going all out at home, I really don't see the point of two out and out holding midfielders when the opposition will put bodies behind the ball.
away from home a more cautious line up is expected but I still think we should take more risks early on and take more risks pushing up the pitch, sure you may be caught with the ball over the top but the more pressure you put on the opposition the more likely they will make unforced errors. our approach to away games this season has been so wrong and that goes right back to that first game of the season with spurs.
 
Sooo, United V Bayern.

On a pertinent note; how's this one from Fergie yesterday...

"Ribery is not as quick as Gary Neville"
 
[quote author=Ryan link=topic=39675.msg1083457#msg1083457 date=1270600617]
Sooo, United V Bayern.

On a pertinent note; how's this one from Fergie yesterday...

"Ribery is not as quick as Gary Neville"
[/quote]

BM are going to sit back soak up pressure and then hit manu hard and fast on the break. if ribery and robben are playing its going to be a long night for manu.
 
[quote author=spider-neil link=topic=39675.msg1083456#msg1083456 date=1270600551]
[quote author=Ryan link=topic=39675.msg1083454#msg1083454 date=1270600221]
[quote author=spider-neil link=topic=39675.msg1083451#msg1083451 date=1270600086]
[quote author=Ryan link=topic=39675.msg1083441#msg1083441 date=1270598853]
[quote author=ibromurph link=topic=39675.msg1083440#msg1083440 date=1270598621]
[quote author=Ryan link=topic=39675.msg1083434#msg1083434 date=1270598207]
[quote author=ibromurph link=topic=39675.msg1083432#msg1083432 date=1270597992]
Ryan, all the best forward players in the world have pace.
[/quote]

Do they all?

Drogba - yes
Ibrahimovic - yes
Higuain - yes
RVN - (in his prime) yes
Forlan (in his prime) yes, though i don't count him as one of the best despite his goals in Spain.
Arshavin - yes
[/quote]

Clearly we have a different understanding of the word 'pace'. Apparently,

You - anyone slower than 10.5s over 100m is slow.

Me - anyone who he is quick and has a good burst of acceleration over 10-20m. So I count players like Tevez, Gerrard and Van Persie as quick.. and players like Kuyt, Lucas and Insua as slow.

I must mention it was almost absurd seeing Stephen Carr easily outpace Insua the other day. Now THAT's fecking slow.
[/quote]

Possibly.

I just don't see pace as being as vital a commodity as others. Most top clubs have 2, sometimes 3 (rarely more) pacy players in their side. We've got that too. Our problem for most of the season is that those two or three have been out injured, and combining that with slow, ponderous football has exacerbated the problem.

We had the same team last year (swop Alonso for Lucas) and teams couldn't live with us.

We don't necessarily need faster players, just better ones.
[/quote]

I don't think its pace either, its willingness to do everything as a unit and putting pressure as high up the field as humanly possible. attack and defend as a team, this makes passing so easy as there are so many passing options. I've thought for a long time the reason so many of our wide players haven't been as effective as you'd hope is because they are given the ball and exepected to do too much by themselves while the defense hangs back in case we are hit on the break.

its way too cautious, that why when we get after teams we start leaking goals for fun because the defense are asked to do too much because the attacking are up field, the 4-4 with chelsea being a good example.
so basically attacking football is having player confident on the ball to be able to release the ball with one touch rather than controlling and then passing, having lots of stamina so you can move into space and also pressure the opposition high up the field.
pace helps but it isn't the be all and end all unless your plan is to hit teams on the break.
[/quote]

Well it depends on who you're playing against and who you've got in your team Spidey.

If you've got your best team available and are at home against most sidexs, then yes - I'm all for pressing in the furthest third.
[/quote]

I don't have a problem with going all out at home, I really don't see the point of two out and out holding midfielders when the opposition will put bodies behind the ball.
away from home a more cautious line up is expected but I still think we should take more risks early on and take more risks pushing up the pitch, sure you may be caught with the ball over the top but the more pressure you put on the opposition the more likely they will make unforced errors. our approach to away games this season has been so wrong and that goes right back to that first game of the season with spurs.
[/quote]

A lot of good teams sit deep (even at home) to pressure Spidey. Chelsea being a great example. They've got the ability, pace, and gameplan to hit teams effectively on the counter. It helps if you've got players that can carry the ball for 30, 40 yards too; like Essien, Malouda, Lampard, Anelka.

Bar Gerrard, and Torres we haven't got much of that. We kinda did with Riera, which is why Benitez liked him, we kinda do with Babel but his end product's not great. We need better players who can carry and keep the ball. Like City have with Tevez, Bellamy, Adebayor, etc. Anyway, I'm going off on a tangent here.
 
I think United will batter Munich.
With or without Rooney they're a much stronger side.
 
[quote author=Ryan link=topic=39675.msg1083462#msg1083462 date=1270600896]
[quote author=spider-neil link=topic=39675.msg1083456#msg1083456 date=1270600551]
[quote author=Ryan link=topic=39675.msg1083454#msg1083454 date=1270600221]
[quote author=spider-neil link=topic=39675.msg1083451#msg1083451 date=1270600086]
[quote author=Ryan link=topic=39675.msg1083441#msg1083441 date=1270598853]
[quote author=ibromurph link=topic=39675.msg1083440#msg1083440 date=1270598621]
[quote author=Ryan link=topic=39675.msg1083434#msg1083434 date=1270598207]
[quote author=ibromurph link=topic=39675.msg1083432#msg1083432 date=1270597992]
Ryan, all the best forward players in the world have pace.
[/quote]

Do they all?

Drogba - yes
Ibrahimovic - yes
Higuain - yes
RVN - (in his prime) yes
Forlan (in his prime) yes, though i don't count him as one of the best despite his goals in Spain.
Arshavin - yes
[/quote]

Clearly we have a different understanding of the word 'pace'. Apparently,

You - anyone slower than 10.5s over 100m is slow.

Me - anyone who he is quick and has a good burst of acceleration over 10-20m. So I count players like Tevez, Gerrard and Van Persie as quick.. and players like Kuyt, Lucas and Insua as slow.

I must mention it was almost absurd seeing Stephen Carr easily outpace Insua the other day. Now THAT's fecking slow.
[/quote]

Possibly.

I just don't see pace as being as vital a commodity as others. Most top clubs have 2, sometimes 3 (rarely more) pacy players in their side. We've got that too. Our problem for most of the season is that those two or three have been out injured, and combining that with slow, ponderous football has exacerbated the problem.

We had the same team last year (swop Alonso for Lucas) and teams couldn't live with us.

We don't necessarily need faster players, just better ones.
[/quote]

I don't think its pace either, its willingness to do everything as a unit and putting pressure as high up the field as humanly possible. attack and defend as a team, this makes passing so easy as there are so many passing options. I've thought for a long time the reason so many of our wide players haven't been as effective as you'd hope is because they are given the ball and exepected to do too much by themselves while the defense hangs back in case we are hit on the break.

its way too cautious, that why when we get after teams we start leaking goals for fun because the defense are asked to do too much because the attacking are up field, the 4-4 with chelsea being a good example.
so basically attacking football is having player confident on the ball to be able to release the ball with one touch rather than controlling and then passing, having lots of stamina so you can move into space and also pressure the opposition high up the field.
pace helps but it isn't the be all and end all unless your plan is to hit teams on the break.
[/quote]

Well it depends on who you're playing against and who you've got in your team Spidey.

If you've got your best team available and are at home against most sidexs, then yes - I'm all for pressing in the furthest third.
[/quote]

I don't have a problem with going all out at home, I really don't see the point of two out and out holding midfielders when the opposition will put bodies behind the ball.
away from home a more cautious line up is expected but I still think we should take more risks early on and take more risks pushing up the pitch, sure you may be caught with the ball over the top but the more pressure you put on the opposition the more likely they will make unforced errors. our approach to away games this season has been so wrong and that goes right back to that first game of the season with spurs.
[/quote]

A lot of good teams sit deep (even at home) to pressure Spidey. Chelsea being a great example. They've got the ability, pace, and gameplan to hit teams effectively on the counter. It helps if you've got players that can carry the ball for 30, 40 yards too; like Essien, Malouda, Lampard, Anelka.

Bar Gerrard, and Torres we haven't got much of that. We kinda did with Riera, which is why Benitez liked him, we kinda do with Babel but his end product's not great. We need better players who can carry and keep the ball. Like City have with Tevez, Bellamy, Adebayor, etc. Anyway, I'm going off on a tangent here.

[/quote]

it shouldn't be about carrying the ball it should be about passing the ball and moving to recieve the pass back. look at the way barca were moving the ball I have no doubt ALL of them can go on mazy runs but the ball moves faster than you do so pass it. I thought nasri was headless today, running with the ball and allowing barca to crowd him out.

we should be pushing up and squeezing the gap between the midfield and torres as much as possible, look at the difference when we compressed the ball in the final 20 min v brum they were all over the fucking place.
 
[quote author=spider-neil link=topic=39675.msg1083473#msg1083473 date=1270601587]
[quote author=Ryan link=topic=39675.msg1083462#msg1083462 date=1270600896]
[quote author=spider-neil link=topic=39675.msg1083456#msg1083456 date=1270600551]
[quote author=Ryan link=topic=39675.msg1083454#msg1083454 date=1270600221]
[quote author=spider-neil link=topic=39675.msg1083451#msg1083451 date=1270600086]
[quote author=Ryan link=topic=39675.msg1083441#msg1083441 date=1270598853]
[quote author=ibromurph link=topic=39675.msg1083440#msg1083440 date=1270598621]
[quote author=Ryan link=topic=39675.msg1083434#msg1083434 date=1270598207]
[quote author=ibromurph link=topic=39675.msg1083432#msg1083432 date=1270597992]
Ryan, all the best forward players in the world have pace.
[/quote]

Do they all?

Drogba - yes
Ibrahimovic - yes
Higuain - yes
RVN - (in his prime) yes
Forlan (in his prime) yes, though i don't count him as one of the best despite his goals in Spain.
Arshavin - yes
[/quote]

Clearly we have a different understanding of the word 'pace'. Apparently,

You - anyone slower than 10.5s over 100m is slow.

Me - anyone who he is quick and has a good burst of acceleration over 10-20m. So I count players like Tevez, Gerrard and Van Persie as quick.. and players like Kuyt, Lucas and Insua as slow.

I must mention it was almost absurd seeing Stephen Carr easily outpace Insua the other day. Now THAT's fecking slow.
[/quote]

Possibly.

I just don't see pace as being as vital a commodity as others. Most top clubs have 2, sometimes 3 (rarely more) pacy players in their side. We've got that too. Our problem for most of the season is that those two or three have been out injured, and combining that with slow, ponderous football has exacerbated the problem.

We had the same team last year (swop Alonso for Lucas) and teams couldn't live with us.

We don't necessarily need faster players, just better ones.
[/quote]

I don't think its pace either, its willingness to do everything as a unit and putting pressure as high up the field as humanly possible. attack and defend as a team, this makes passing so easy as there are so many passing options. I've thought for a long time the reason so many of our wide players haven't been as effective as you'd hope is because they are given the ball and exepected to do too much by themselves while the defense hangs back in case we are hit on the break.

its way too cautious, that why when we get after teams we start leaking goals for fun because the defense are asked to do too much because the attacking are up field, the 4-4 with chelsea being a good example.
so basically attacking football is having player confident on the ball to be able to release the ball with one touch rather than controlling and then passing, having lots of stamina so you can move into space and also pressure the opposition high up the field.
pace helps but it isn't the be all and end all unless your plan is to hit teams on the break.
[/quote]

Well it depends on who you're playing against and who you've got in your team Spidey.

If you've got your best team available and are at home against most sidexs, then yes - I'm all for pressing in the furthest third.
[/quote]

I don't have a problem with going all out at home, I really don't see the point of two out and out holding midfielders when the opposition will put bodies behind the ball.
away from home a more cautious line up is expected but I still think we should take more risks early on and take more risks pushing up the pitch, sure you may be caught with the ball over the top but the more pressure you put on the opposition the more likely they will make unforced errors. our approach to away games this season has been so wrong and that goes right back to that first game of the season with spurs.
[/quote]

A lot of good teams sit deep (even at home) to pressure Spidey. Chelsea being a great example. They've got the ability, pace, and gameplan to hit teams effectively on the counter. It helps if you've got players that can carry the ball for 30, 40 yards too; like Essien, Malouda, Lampard, Anelka.

Bar Gerrard, and Torres we haven't got much of that. We kinda did with Riera, which is why Benitez liked him, we kinda do with Babel but his end product's not great. We need better players who can carry and keep the ball. Like City have with Tevez, Bellamy, Adebayor, etc. Anyway, I'm going off on a tangent here.

[/quote]

it shouldn't be about carrying the ball it should be about passing the ball and moving to recieve the pass back. look at the way barca were moving the ball I have no doubt ALL of them can go on mazy runs but the ball moves faster than you do so pass it. I thought nasri was headless today, running with the ball and allowing barca to crowd him out.

we should be pushing up and squeezing the gap between the midfield and torres as much as possible, look at the difference when we compressed the ball in the final 20 min v brum they were all over the fucking place.
[/quote]

Birmingham tired, dropped deep, and allowed us to play higher up the pitch. Inevitable really. For most of the game though we were in possession of the ball, so pressing high is a bit inconsequential really. It's what you do with it when you have the ball, how quickly it moves, how easily good (or supposedly good) players find space in tight areas, and thus how many chances you create.

Look at Sunday's game, having more players with pace wouldn't have made much of a difference in that first half, because there was no room to work in. Having a Tevez, an Arshavin, a Rooney, etc etc would have made a difference though. Easy in theory I suppose.

Anyway, I think we're saying the same thing here.
 
[quote author=Ryan link=topic=39675.msg1083476#msg1083476 date=1270601848]
[quote author=spider-neil link=topic=39675.msg1083473#msg1083473 date=1270601587]
[quote author=Ryan link=topic=39675.msg1083462#msg1083462 date=1270600896]
[quote author=spider-neil link=topic=39675.msg1083456#msg1083456 date=1270600551]
[quote author=Ryan link=topic=39675.msg1083454#msg1083454 date=1270600221]
[quote author=spider-neil link=topic=39675.msg1083451#msg1083451 date=1270600086]
[quote author=Ryan link=topic=39675.msg1083441#msg1083441 date=1270598853]
[quote author=ibromurph link=topic=39675.msg1083440#msg1083440 date=1270598621]
[quote author=Ryan link=topic=39675.msg1083434#msg1083434 date=1270598207]
[quote author=ibromurph link=topic=39675.msg1083432#msg1083432 date=1270597992]
Ryan, all the best forward players in the world have pace.
[/quote]

Do they all?

Drogba - yes
Ibrahimovic - yes
Higuain - yes
RVN - (in his prime) yes
Forlan (in his prime) yes, though i don't count him as one of the best despite his goals in Spain.
Arshavin - yes
[/quote]

Clearly we have a different understanding of the word 'pace'. Apparently,

You - anyone slower than 10.5s over 100m is slow.

Me - anyone who he is quick and has a good burst of acceleration over 10-20m. So I count players like Tevez, Gerrard and Van Persie as quick.. and players like Kuyt, Lucas and Insua as slow.

I must mention it was almost absurd seeing Stephen Carr easily outpace Insua the other day. Now THAT's fecking slow.
[/quote]

Possibly.

I just don't see pace as being as vital a commodity as others. Most top clubs have 2, sometimes 3 (rarely more) pacy players in their side. We've got that too. Our problem for most of the season is that those two or three have been out injured, and combining that with slow, ponderous football has exacerbated the problem.

We had the same team last year (swop Alonso for Lucas) and teams couldn't live with us.

We don't necessarily need faster players, just better ones.
[/quote]

I don't think its pace either, its willingness to do everything as a unit and putting pressure as high up the field as humanly possible. attack and defend as a team, this makes passing so easy as there are so many passing options. I've thought for a long time the reason so many of our wide players haven't been as effective as you'd hope is because they are given the ball and exepected to do too much by themselves while the defense hangs back in case we are hit on the break.

its way too cautious, that why when we get after teams we start leaking goals for fun because the defense are asked to do too much because the attacking are up field, the 4-4 with chelsea being a good example.
so basically attacking football is having player confident on the ball to be able to release the ball with one touch rather than controlling and then passing, having lots of stamina so you can move into space and also pressure the opposition high up the field.
pace helps but it isn't the be all and end all unless your plan is to hit teams on the break.
[/quote]

Well it depends on who you're playing against and who you've got in your team Spidey.

If you've got your best team available and are at home against most sidexs, then yes - I'm all for pressing in the furthest third.
[/quote]

I don't have a problem with going all out at home, I really don't see the point of two out and out holding midfielders when the opposition will put bodies behind the ball.
away from home a more cautious line up is expected but I still think we should take more risks early on and take more risks pushing up the pitch, sure you may be caught with the ball over the top but the more pressure you put on the opposition the more likely they will make unforced errors. our approach to away games this season has been so wrong and that goes right back to that first game of the season with spurs.
[/quote]

A lot of good teams sit deep (even at home) to pressure Spidey. Chelsea being a great example. They've got the ability, pace, and gameplan to hit teams effectively on the counter. It helps if you've got players that can carry the ball for 30, 40 yards too; like Essien, Malouda, Lampard, Anelka.

Bar Gerrard, and Torres we haven't got much of that. We kinda did with Riera, which is why Benitez liked him, we kinda do with Babel but his end product's not great. We need better players who can carry and keep the ball. Like City have with Tevez, Bellamy, Adebayor, etc. Anyway, I'm going off on a tangent here.

[/quote]

it shouldn't be about carrying the ball it should be about passing the ball and moving to recieve the pass back. look at the way barca were moving the ball I have no doubt ALL of them can go on mazy runs but the ball moves faster than you do so pass it. I thought nasri was headless today, running with the ball and allowing barca to crowd him out.

we should be pushing up and squeezing the gap between the midfield and torres as much as possible, look at the difference when we compressed the ball in the final 20 min v brum they were all over the fucking place.
[/quote]

Birmingham tired, dropped deep, and allowed us to play higher up the pitch. Inevitable really. For most of the game though we were in possession of the ball, so pressing high is a bit inconsequential really. It's what you do with it when you have the ball, how quickly it moves, how easily good (or supposedly good) players find space in tight areas, and thus how many chances you create.

Look at Sunday's game, having more players with pace wouldn't have made much of a difference in that first half, because there was no room to work in. Having a Tevez, an Arshavin, a Rooney, etc etc would have made a difference though. Easy in theory I suppose.

Anyway, I think we're saying the same thing here.
[/quote]

that person for us is gerrard but he has been hit by injuries and loss of form.
 
[quote author=spider-neil link=topic=39675.msg1083483#msg1083483 date=1270602506]
[quote author=Ryan link=topic=39675.msg1083476#msg1083476 date=1270601848]
[quote author=spider-neil link=topic=39675.msg1083473#msg1083473 date=1270601587]
[quote author=Ryan link=topic=39675.msg1083462#msg1083462 date=1270600896]
[quote author=spider-neil link=topic=39675.msg1083456#msg1083456 date=1270600551]
[quote author=Ryan link=topic=39675.msg1083454#msg1083454 date=1270600221]
[quote author=spider-neil link=topic=39675.msg1083451#msg1083451 date=1270600086]
[quote author=Ryan link=topic=39675.msg1083441#msg1083441 date=1270598853]
[quote author=ibromurph link=topic=39675.msg1083440#msg1083440 date=1270598621]
[quote author=Ryan link=topic=39675.msg1083434#msg1083434 date=1270598207]
[quote author=ibromurph link=topic=39675.msg1083432#msg1083432 date=1270597992]
Ryan, all the best forward players in the world have pace.
[/quote]

Do they all?

Drogba - yes
Ibrahimovic - yes
Higuain - yes
RVN - (in his prime) yes
Forlan (in his prime) yes, though i don't count him as one of the best despite his goals in Spain.
Arshavin - yes
[/quote]

Clearly we have a different understanding of the word 'pace'. Apparently,

You - anyone slower than 10.5s over 100m is slow.

Me - anyone who he is quick and has a good burst of acceleration over 10-20m. So I count players like Tevez, Gerrard and Van Persie as quick.. and players like Kuyt, Lucas and Insua as slow.

I must mention it was almost absurd seeing Stephen Carr easily outpace Insua the other day. Now THAT's fecking slow.
[/quote]

Possibly.

I just don't see pace as being as vital a commodity as others. Most top clubs have 2, sometimes 3 (rarely more) pacy players in their side. We've got that too. Our problem for most of the season is that those two or three have been out injured, and combining that with slow, ponderous football has exacerbated the problem.

We had the same team last year (swop Alonso for Lucas) and teams couldn't live with us.

We don't necessarily need faster players, just better ones.
[/quote]

I don't think its pace either, its willingness to do everything as a unit and putting pressure as high up the field as humanly possible. attack and defend as a team, this makes passing so easy as there are so many passing options. I've thought for a long time the reason so many of our wide players haven't been as effective as you'd hope is because they are given the ball and exepected to do too much by themselves while the defense hangs back in case we are hit on the break.

its way too cautious, that why when we get after teams we start leaking goals for fun because the defense are asked to do too much because the attacking are up field, the 4-4 with chelsea being a good example.
so basically attacking football is having player confident on the ball to be able to release the ball with one touch rather than controlling and then passing, having lots of stamina so you can move into space and also pressure the opposition high up the field.
pace helps but it isn't the be all and end all unless your plan is to hit teams on the break.
[/quote]

Well it depends on who you're playing against and who you've got in your team Spidey.

If you've got your best team available and are at home against most sidexs, then yes - I'm all for pressing in the furthest third.
[/quote]

I don't have a problem with going all out at home, I really don't see the point of two out and out holding midfielders when the opposition will put bodies behind the ball.
away from home a more cautious line up is expected but I still think we should take more risks early on and take more risks pushing up the pitch, sure you may be caught with the ball over the top but the more pressure you put on the opposition the more likely they will make unforced errors. our approach to away games this season has been so wrong and that goes right back to that first game of the season with spurs.
[/quote]

A lot of good teams sit deep (even at home) to pressure Spidey. Chelsea being a great example. They've got the ability, pace, and gameplan to hit teams effectively on the counter. It helps if you've got players that can carry the ball for 30, 40 yards too; like Essien, Malouda, Lampard, Anelka.

Bar Gerrard, and Torres we haven't got much of that. We kinda did with Riera, which is why Benitez liked him, we kinda do with Babel but his end product's not great. We need better players who can carry and keep the ball. Like City have with Tevez, Bellamy, Adebayor, etc. Anyway, I'm going off on a tangent here.

[/quote]

it shouldn't be about carrying the ball it should be about passing the ball and moving to recieve the pass back. look at the way barca were moving the ball I have no doubt ALL of them can go on mazy runs but the ball moves faster than you do so pass it. I thought nasri was headless today, running with the ball and allowing barca to crowd him out.

we should be pushing up and squeezing the gap between the midfield and torres as much as possible, look at the difference when we compressed the ball in the final 20 min v brum they were all over the fucking place.
[/quote]

Birmingham tired, dropped deep, and allowed us to play higher up the pitch. Inevitable really. For most of the game though we were in possession of the ball, so pressing high is a bit inconsequential really. It's what you do with it when you have the ball, how quickly it moves, how easily good (or supposedly good) players find space in tight areas, and thus how many chances you create.

Look at Sunday's game, having more players with pace wouldn't have made much of a difference in that first half, because there was no room to work in. Having a Tevez, an Arshavin, a Rooney, etc etc would have made a difference though. Easy in theory I suppose.

Anyway, I think we're saying the same thing here.
[/quote]

that person for us is gerrard but he has been hit by injuries and loss of form.
[/quote]

We need more than Gerrard though Spidey, I've been saying it all fucking year.

Look at the Arsenal away game this season. 1-0 down and he has to drop 30 yards to get the ball and start moving things around quickly. How's the going to hust teams when he's 50 yards from goal? He didn't have to do that last season when we were chasing and winning games late on in matches? Because Alonso was there doing that for him. We've lost Alonso, and not replaecd him.

But even that aside, we need more world class players in attack in support of Torres and Gerrard. I sound like a broken fucking record with this, but we do and it's what we need.
 
“We lost against a team better than us, with the best player in world,†the Arsenal manager said. “He’s like a PlayStation player — he can take advantage of every mistake we make.

“Messi is the best player in the world by a distance. He’s not always in the game, but when he is he’s really dangerous. Once he’s on a run he’s unstoppable, the only player who can change direction at such pace and be a threat.â€

Wenger said he did not know another player in the world who could have scored a goal like Messi’s fourth.

“He made the impossible possible,†the Frenchman said. “He has something exceptional. He has six or seven years in front of him, touch wood that nothing happens to him, and he can reach unbelievable levels. He’s very young, but he can achieve a lot.

High praise.
 
Yeah I think Utd will win with ease, 3 or 4 nil. Oh and Ferguson is on glue if he thinks Neville is quicker than Ribery.

I'm really upset that Inter/Barca is a semi. It should be a final that. And I can see Man Utd getting to the final again and I can see them doing a number over either of them.

On the point about pacy players, Xavi and Iniesta are two of Barcelona's most important players, behind Messi obvs, and neither are particularly quick. Especially Xavi, he's fucking insane, slow, but one of the best players on the planet at the moment. He's so important to them. Pace doesn't matter when you've got the quickness of thought these guys have. Sadly we don't have enough players on that wavelength.

I was at the Nou Camp when Barca played Malaga this season, and if I see a better performance from an individual live in my lifetime I will have been truly blessed. Xavi was unreal.
 
[quote author=Halmeister link=topic=39675.msg1083511#msg1083511 date=1270606169]
Yeah I think Utd will win with ease, 3 or 4 nil. Oh and Ferguson is on glue if he thinks Neville is quicker than Ribery.

I'm really upset that Inter/Barca is a semi. It should be a final that. And I can see Man Utd getting to the final again and I can see them doing a number over either of them.

On the point about pacy players, Xavi and Iniesta are two of Barcelona's most important players, behind Messi obvs, and neither are particularly quick. Especially Xavi, he's fucking insane, slow, but one of the best players on the planet at the moment. He's so important to them. Pace doesn't matter when you've got the quickness of thought these guys have. Sadly we don't have enough players on that wavelength.
[/quote]

Thank you.
 
Xavi and Iniesta play in midfield though, so it's not as relevant to the debate as discussing out and out attackers.

As for imagining Barcelona with Torres, well it's not *that* hard after watching them for years with Eto'o in the side. Ibrahimovic is a very good player but Barcelona, good as they are, still miss his pace and movement up front.
 
Ibrahimovic offers them something different though. It's hard to see how they could improve after winning the CL last season, but the decision to replace him with Eto'o has worked for the most part.
 
I think I have been one of the very few to defend Ibrahimovic on here in recent years, but I don't really think you can say it's worked out. He offers them something different on paper but after starting the season on fire, he's not been great. Their saving grace is that Messi has largely picked up the slack and when he is played in a central free role, as he often is now, he provides that pace and cutting edge up top that they used to have with Eto'o.

There is already speculation that they'll look to buy in another striker like Villa in the summer.
 
I maybe worded that wrong, but I suppose I was sceptiocal of the decision to replace him with Eto'o, but having watched quite a bit of them this season, I think having him in there has worked for them really well.

He offers them far more options in attack than Eto'o, who was nearly always looking for the through ball, or the one in behind.

He's certainly looked shite on one or two occassions, but I think a lot of that's down to his attitude and workrate - both of which can leave a lot to be desired. When he's on song though, he complements the way they play really well, and adds a new dimension to them in attack that they didn't have previously.
 
Nah, I just don't agree and I reckon I'm in the majority. It's not as though they're now starting to play the long ball or are using him as a genuine target man - they're not gaining much benefit from these additional options. In general, they play in the same way they did before with some tactical changes, but it's generally accepted that they're not at their best this year. I've seen them struggle on numerous occasions.

Now I like Ibra as a player and you can just put it down to teething problems - we'll see - but it'll be interesting to see what happens in the next season or two. He needs to start fitting in and genuinely leading the line pretty quickly.
 
eto'o was a much better option for them. he was more clinical and could pull wide to start attacks from flanks. I can only imagine it was off the field stuff that prompted the move.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom