• You may have to login or register before you can post and view our exclusive members only forums.
    To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Liverpool related transfer speculation

Forums Unread posts
The drawback to Kane for me isn't anything to do with cost or salary, it is that he is past his peak and we'd need to replace him in 1 or 2 seasons time. That might be ok if we are investing properly elsewhere (given we are linked to defenders, this feels like we are) then that might be a wise 'safe bet' but the reason his level looks to have 'maintained' is that he's going into a piss easy league.

Slot would want him pressing from the front a lot, and I don't know if that is still part of his game.
 
I don't see the point of all these signings if we lose Mo, Virg, Trent, Konate and anyone who is valuable and is going to be out of contract soon.

If the club has a problem with paying the big salaries, then we are just going to be going around in circles I'm afraid.
 
Brizzle said:
The drawback to Kane for me isn't anything to do with cost or salary, it is that he is past his peak and we'd need to replace him in 1 or 2 seasons time. That might be ok if we are investing properly elsewhere (given we are linked to defenders, this feels like we are) then that might be a wise 'safe bet' but the reason his level looks to have 'maintained' is that he's going into a piss easy league.

Slot would want him pressing from the front a lot, and I don't know if that is still part of his game.
Click to expand...
Yep you can see it for England. He's being carried now.
 
KopRed said:
I don't see the point of all these signings if we lose Mo, Virg, Trent, Konate and anyone who is valuable and is going to be out of contract soon.

If the club has a problem with paying the big salaries, then we are just going to be going around in circles I'm afraid.
Click to expand...

I don’t think the club has a problem with it as such - the target number is 70% of our turnover and within that there’s a level of risk around CL income, which is significant.

I assume we mitigate that risk somewhat by basic salary and then incentivised increases for those involved in the squad based in income for qualifying and progressing.

It’s then really just doing to numbers and counting and nothing to do with the club management at all.

Unless we want to be the financial cheating cunts we accuse City of being.
 
KopRed said:
I don't see the point of all these signings if we lose Mo, Virg, Trent, Konate and anyone who is valuable and is going to be out of contract soon.

If the club has a problem with paying the big salaries, then we are just going to be going around in circles I'm afraid.
Click to expand...

We have the second or third highest wage bill in the PL. I bet for non state sponsored clubs who spend only what they make, we may have close to the highest wage bill in Europe. Not sure, how we can be accused of not paying the big salaries.
 
Given Bradley's injury record, can we really gamble on a kid with 18 appearances under his belt in Portugal?

I'd need some convincing.
 
Gosh, I want Connor Bradley to be a starting option to but the levels of rating on here especially Trent has confirmed practically almost what we know has gone new levels.
I just want us to sign someone whom is able to RB to a decent level and to be fit and available for next season.
 
Modo said:
I dont understand the reasoning behind signing someone in the same age bracket as Bradley.
Think we should go for someone older.
Click to expand...

Depends on how old and whether they expect to be first choice.

We don’t tend to sign players over the age of 27 very often.

If we signed a “in his prime” RB, would you be at all surprised if Bradley stalled on signing a contract and considered his options?
 
StevieM said:
Depends on how old and whether they expect to be first choice.

We don’t tend to sign players over the age of 27 very often.

If we signed a “in his prime” RB, would you be at all surprised if Bradley stalled on signing a contract and considered his options?
Click to expand...
Bradders turns 22 in the summer. I wouldn't mind someone between 25-27 with more experience if we're looking for a first choice RB.

He's in no position to demand a first choice spot considering his injury history.
He'll just have to fight for his place like the majority of the players in the squad currently are.

His current contract expires in 2027. No chance he won't sign a new contract.
 
Modo said:
Bradders turns 22 in the summer. I wouldn't mind someone between 25-27 with more experience if we're looking for a first choice RB.

He's in no position to demand a first choice spot considering his injury history.
He'll just have to fight for his place like the majority of the players in the squad currently are.

His current contract expires in 2027. No chance he won't sign a new contract.
Click to expand...

Just re-think that a little bit.

He’s 22, so this is the point in his career when he’d want to be nailing down a starting position - not being a backup.

If we sign someone in their prime, they’d better be good and capable of holding down a starting position in a top tier team - otherwise why bother - it’ll be another Tsimikas scenario were we spend all the time complaining he’s not good enough and should be sold.

If we do sign someone in their prime, what’s the incentive for Bradley to sign another contract, because if he’s not playing regularly from here on, that’s no good for him and he’d be as well thinking hard about whether his future lies elsewhere.

It’s almost similar to Kelleher and it would be the same if Trent did re-sign.

You’d only have to look at Neco Williams to see how it’s be potentially better to walk away than stay.

The other side of it is, if we are going to re-sign him, what sort of contract do you think he’d be looking for - you reckon he’s not going to ask for money in the £100k range?
 
peekay said:
We have the second or third highest wage bill in the PL. I bet for non state sponsored clubs who spend only what they make, we may have close to the highest wage bill in Europe. Not sure, how we can be accused of not paying the big salaries.
Click to expand...
No clue on the detail of our wage bill but that doesn't mean we are paying the big salaries as the reality is showing. Perhaps we have been overpaying squad players who are not worth their weight inflating the entire bill? Perhaps as a big club we should be trying to attract players on a free and in their prime like Real is, albeit a slightly lower tier of players who are willing to come?

The point I am trying to make is, something is wrong with our wage structure, we let players run down their contract likely due to us not paying them the wages they can get elsewhere. Trent leaves, with Konate potentially leaving, are we confident of keeping Grav, Macca, Cody, Szobo when the time comes? Until we find that balance of being a big club and paying the correct wages with a forward looking process, anyone we bring in will likely leave for bigger money after they become successful because we are not willing or unable to pay.
 
Stevesquash said:
When was the last time one of our "big" players resigned a new contract for us?
Click to expand...

Quansah - Oct 2024
Bradley - Dec 2023
Tsimikas - Sep 2023
Jota - Aug 2022
Elliott - Aug 2022
Jones - Nov 2022
Gomez - Jul 2022
Salah - Jul 2022
Robertson - Aug 2021
Alisson - Aug 2021
VVD - Aug 2021
Fabinho - Aug 2021
Henderson - Aug 2021
TAA - Jul 2021

Edwards - departure announced in Nov 2021
Ward - departure announced in Nov 2022
Schmadtke - appointed in May 2023
Hughes - appointed in Mar 2024

(Edited to include Quansah, Elliot and Bradley's contract extensions)
 
Thanks Binny.

That makes incredible reading! I mean they're all important but there's been nothing major since Nov 22, and nothing at all for over 18 months. Quite remarkable.

Wtf are they playing at?
 
Modo said:
I dont understand the reasoning behind signing someone in the same age bracket as Bradley.
Think we should go for someone older.
Click to expand...

We did that when we signed Calvin Ramsay. 😛

Bradley:

Untitled.jpg


Was thinking if Crystal Palace comes back for Doak, it might be worth using the proceeds on Munoz. Cost them €8.1m.

www.cpfc.co.uk

‘El hincha en la cancha’: All you need to know about Daniel Muñoz - News - Crystal Palace F.C.

www.cpfc.co.uk www.cpfc.co.uk
"Last season, 2022/23, was his best in front of goal, as he scored seven times and registered seven assists in just 30 games.

He departs Genk having made 148 appearances in all competitions (including 18 in European competition), scoring 19 goals and 20 assists in total.

The full-back has impressed through his career with his speed, tenacity, pinpoint delivery and versatility, playing most regularly at right-back, but also centre-back, defensive midfielder and even further forward at various stages."

Untitled.jpg


View: https://x.com/PFF_FC/status/1904931601748025420
 
StevieM said:
Just re-think that a little bit.

He’s 22, so this is the point in his career when he’d want to be nailing down a starting position - not being a backup.

If we sign someone in their prime, they’d better be good and capable of holding down a starting position in a top tier team - otherwise why bother - it’ll be another Tsimikas scenario were we spend all the time complaining he’s not good enough and should be sold.

If we do sign someone in their prime, what’s the incentive for Bradley to sign another contract, because if he’s not playing regularly from here on, that’s no good for him and he’d be as well thinking hard about whether his future lies elsewhere.

It’s almost similar to Kelleher and it would be the same if Trent did re-sign.

You’d only have to look at Neco Williams to see how it’s be potentially better to walk away than stay.

The other side of it is, if we are going to re-sign him, what sort of contract do you think he’d be looking for - you reckon he’s not going to ask for money in the £100k range?
Click to expand...

What I like about someone like Aina is that Aina is a lot more defensive minded, Bradley a lot more attacking. Bradley can't / won't / shouldn't be looked at to suddenly play 50 games a season as his body would break. Having someone in a different style would work well as we can tailor it by opponent.

The challenge to expecting Bradley to become out first choice is whether he is up to that challenge physically yet. I hope he is, but if he needs another year or so to work up to that level then we need a second choice who is reliable and good quality.
 
Stevesquash said:
Thanks Binny.

That makes incredible reading! I mean they're all important but there's been nothing major since Nov 22, and nothing at all for over 18 months. Quite remarkable.

Wtf are they playing at?
Click to expand...

I think it’s pretty clear where the issue is - the ball was dropped the minute Ward left the club until the appointment of Hughes - as we know he’s been involved in contract discussions with Trent, Mo, Virgil, Konate & Bradley at least.

It’s also worth noting that Klopp told FSG of his decision to leave in Nov 2023.

Everything seems to have ground to a hault - with no-one having responsibility to get new contracts done around that period.

I can’t help but think we have yet to hear the full story of why Ward left so soon after replacing Edwards, why it took so long to replace him and ultimately why Klopp decided to go early.
 
StevieM said:
Just re-think that a little bit.

He’s 22, so this is the point in his career when he’d want to be nailing down a starting position - not being a backup.

If we sign someone in their prime, they’d better be good and capable of holding down a starting position in a top tier team - otherwise why bother - it’ll be another Tsimikas scenario were we spend all the time complaining he’s not good enough and should be sold.

If we do sign someone in their prime, what’s the incentive for Bradley to sign another contract, because if he’s not playing regularly from here on, that’s no good for him and he’d be as well thinking hard about whether his future lies elsewhere.

It’s almost similar to Kelleher and it would be the same if Trent did re-sign.

You’d only have to look at Neco Williams to see how it’s be potentially better to walk away than stay.

The other side of it is, if we are going to re-sign him, what sort of contract do you think he’d be looking for - you reckon he’s not going to ask for money in the £100k range?
Click to expand...

I see Bradley in the Curtis Jones bracket. He's decent and maybe has another level to climb but we can't afford to bank on it not in the least due to perceived injury proneness. In midfield, we signed Gravy, Macca and Szobo. Jones is still here. If Bradley wants to leave, it is what it is... we've got to do what's right for the team first and foremost and that is signing as good a player as we can.

Hopefully Hughes is thinking along similar lines.
 
StevieM said:
Just re-think that a little bit.

He’s 22, so this is the point in his career when he’d want to be nailing down a starting position - not being a backup.

If we sign someone in their prime, they’d better be good and capable of holding down a starting position in a top tier team - otherwise why bother - it’ll be another Tsimikas scenario were we spend all the time complaining he’s not good enough and should be sold.

If we do sign someone in their prime, what’s the incentive for Bradley to sign another contract, because if he’s not playing regularly from here on, that’s no good for him and he’d be as well thinking hard about whether his future lies elsewhere.

It’s almost similar to Kelleher and it would be the same if Trent did re-sign.

You’d only have to look at Neco Williams to see how it’s be potentially better to walk away than stay.

The other side of it is, if we are going to re-sign him, what sort of contract do you think he’d be looking for - you reckon he’s not going to ask for money in the £100k range?
Click to expand...
Neco is a bad example, he wasn't good enough and we had Gomez and maybe even Milner covering that position at the time.

Also what's the incentive to sign anyone then?
We should have 11 senior players and 11 youth players then.

I don't see why Bradley would leave if we sign Aina for instance.
 
I would say there is zero chance Bradley wants to leave. He managed to impress on majority of his appearances when an understudy to a guy who for 2 - 3 seasons was the best RB in the world. He scored his superb goal against Chelsea which made us all take note. He absolutely pocketed Mbappe and he's going to get a PL winners medal this year.

If he has a true elite sportsman mentality, he will absolutely be out to demonstrate that he is the successor to Trent whether someone else comes in or not. He can't be dumb enough to think that we would lose a RB and not add anyone else, given Gomez is still a crock.

I have faith in the Bradders long term, but I do think he might be a bit rotated next year to manage his ability to play consistently across so many games.
 
King Binny said:
We did that when we signed Calvin Ramsay. 😛

Bradley:

View attachment 3904

Was thinking if Crystal Palace comes back for Doak, it might be worth using the proceeds on Munoz. Cost them €8.1m.

www.cpfc.co.uk

‘El hincha en la cancha’: All you need to know about Daniel Muñoz - News - Crystal Palace F.C.

www.cpfc.co.uk www.cpfc.co.uk
"Last season, 2022/23, was his best in front of goal, as he scored seven times and registered seven assists in just 30 games.

He departs Genk having made 148 appearances in all competitions (including 18 in European competition), scoring 19 goals and 20 assists in total.

The full-back has impressed through his career with his speed, tenacity, pinpoint delivery and versatility, playing most regularly at right-back, but also centre-back, defensive midfielder and even further forward at various stages."

View attachment 3905
Click to expand...
We did, but that 2-3 years ago. We didn't know how good Bradley would become.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

King Binny
    • Like
Dominik Szoboszlai, Liverpool’s Two-in-One Workhorse
2
Replies
52
Views
2K
Modo
Modo
localny
    • Angry
    • Glum
  • Locked
Ticket Fraud @ Liverpool FC
Replies
17
Views
672
Dreambeliever
Dreambeliever
6cmRed
  • Locked
Liverpool Echo Anthony Gordon sends new four-word message amid Liverpool transfer saga
Replies
0
Views
165
6cmRed
6cmRed
the count
  • Locked
Are we the Cunts..........................
Replies
8
Views
552
Whaddapie
Whaddapie
Squiggles
    • Like
  • Locked
Other PL Games 24-25/08/2024
2 3 4 5 6
Replies
156
Views
3K
CueEye
C
Back
Top Bottom