When he's in goal, it's murder.
Max, is that you?
When he's in goal, it's murder.
Well, this is a Hart to Hart threadMax, is that you?
Hart's reported this morning to have said he's willing to take a pay cut to join us (by contrast with the absence of any such statement in respect of joining the bitters).
I don't share what appears to be the general view on this. While I agree that Ming isn't our biggest concern, IMO it's clear that he's not going to get better than he is now in a Liverpool shirt, he's still saleable, Hart will have a major point or two to prove and he appears to want the move. Incidentally he and Milner are bezzies. I say go for it.
I don't think anyone's forgotten Karius TBH, but he's (a) still young and (b) injured. I'm happy we signed him but I would not be happy with making him our regular no.1 yet. As for the question whether Hart would improve us, at his best (and I admit he'd need to be) he's a clear improvement on Ming IMO.
Lol isn't that Hart to Hart?When he's in goal, it's murder.
Wouldn't dispute any of that. However, in my judgment being discarded by Guardiola has given him two things he hasn't had before, namely (i) a massive jolt and (ii) not merely a professional but now also a very personal stake in working to improve. Of course it's true that he should have had that anyway, but he's hardly alone among pro footballers in needing a succession of boots up the fundament. When Karius is back he'll also provide competition of a standard which Hart has never really had before, not for his club (or arguably for England until recently). Last but not least, as I indicated above I have no belief left that Ming - an intelligent lad and a willing worker - has it in him to improve further even with the best of intentions.
See where you're coming from, but I'm not at all sure we did sign Karius with a view to his becoming no.1 any time soon - and I hope we didn't, because I wouldn't be happy about that position going to a keeper (any keeper) in his early 20s. My bet is that the plan was to sign a very good young keeper whom we could groom to take the no.1 slot eventually, but who would be good enough in his own right to push the current incumbent meanwhile (the contract extension given to Mignolet would tend to back that up IMHO), and I don't reckon signing Hart now would interfere with such a plan.
You seem to have an issue with Karius being such a young keeper yet he is aged twenty three.See where you're coming from, but I'm not at all sure we did sign Karius with a view to his becoming no.1 any time soon - and I hope we didn't, because I wouldn't be happy about that position going to a keeper (any keeper) in his early 20s. My bet is that the plan was to sign a very good young keeper whom we could groom to take the no.1 slot eventually, but who would be good enough in his own right to push the current incumbent meanwhile (the contract extension given to Mignolet would tend to back that up IMHO), and I don't reckon signing Hart now would interfere with such a plan.
Truth bombsYou seem to have an issue with Karius being such a young keeper yet he is aged twenty three.
That is not some pimply teenager still wet between the years.
It might be different if he was just making the break through to top flight football but he was been a top rated goalkeeper in the bundesliga for the last three seasons and there is every chance that he is going to, or at least could, improve. I think it is less likely that Hart is going to improve going into his thirties.
For reference, Pepe Reina who in his first four seasons was the best keeper we have had since Ray Clemence in my opinion, was also twenty three when he arrived.
Clem was twenty two when he became the Lverpool number one.
If Karius is good enough he is old enough and there are plenty of examples to prove it
Hart was a better goalkeeper at 23 than he is now.See where you're coming from, but I'm not at all sure we did sign Karius with a view to his becoming no.1 any time soon - and I hope we didn't, because I wouldn't be happy about that position going to a keeper (any keeper) in his early 20s. My bet is that the plan was to sign a very good young keeper whom we could groom to take the no.1 slot eventually, but who would be good enough in his own right to push the current incumbent meanwhile (the contract extension given to Mignolet would tend to back that up IMHO), and I don't reckon signing Hart now would interfere with such a plan.
On loan or to buy ?From the Echo;
Liverpool are not interested in signing unsettled Manchester City goalkeeper Joe Hart.
The Reds have repeatedly been linked with a move for the England shot-stopper since it emerged last week that he was free to leave the Etihad.
Hart, who has lost his place since the arrival of Pep Guardiola, is expected to secure a loan deal away from City over the coming days following their £15.4million signing of Claudio Bravo from Barcelona.
However, Anfield won’t be his destination as Jurgen Klopp isn’t looking for another keeper.
Liverpool bought Loris Karius from Mainz for £4.7million this summer to compete with Simon Mignolet for the No 1 spot.
Klopp also snapped up veteran Alex Manninger on a free transfer in order to provide further.
Karius has yet to feature due to the broken hand he suffered in pre-season but the Germany Under-21s international is making good progress.
He hopes to return to full training shortly after the international break and could be back in action before the end of September.
Mignolet has made a solid start to the season and Klopp believes Liverpool already boast sufficient quality in the keeping department for the campaign ahead.
That's about his level, looks like it's taken Pep for him to get called out on it, and they've a couple more english players there now.