• You may have to login or register before you can post and view our exclusive members only forums.
    To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Poll Firmino Vs Sterling.

Prefix for Poll Threads

Take your pick

  • Raheem

    Votes: 18 22.5%
  • Roberto

    Votes: 62 77.5%

  • Total voters
    80
Status
Not open for further replies.
I wouldn't have Sterling anywhere near our club. An odious little cancerous shit. Who's overrated to hell. And shit.

Hang your head in shame anyone who picked him.

I would assume it was in terms of ability only otherwise I doubt anyone would pick him as his exit wasn't pretty to say the least.
 
I think Firmino has a lot more to his game, but the ceiling is high for both of them.
 
To be fair Firmino has scored most of them goals as a striker, a luxury Sterling hasn't been afforded (I think)

And Sterling plays in a team that costs 2000 mill £ (or something) with loads of attacking talent.
 
If Sterliing had stayed with us he would have been streeets ahead of Frim. Think he moved 2/3 years early, as he stilll developing.

Fim shoorting has been woeful for morst of the season but his stats now dont look too bad, a decent chance to hit double figures for goals/assits in his first season in a new league is good start.
 
Firmino.. He is going to immense next Season.. the silky basterd...

Anyway, Id prefer him at the club, just because he does things like this.. he so knew what he was doing here..

Whereas Sterling is a Wannabe Gangster prick...

CIVFF-2WIAAb6LO.jpg
 
Jermaine Defoe has scored 10 premier league goals this season, Kevin De Bruyne has 5, who's better?

Thats your argument?Goals scored.

The point was Sterling plays next David Silva, Aguero, De Bruyne. While Firmino has played next to Lallana, Benteke, Milner for the most part of the season.
Sterling averages about 2 shots pr game while Firmino averages 1,8. Firmino also averages more key passes pr game.

Before the 6-0 yesterday that City attack had scored nearly 20 goals more than us.
So the point is, you have a different platform to perform when being part of that City attack compared to us.
 
Or that you're required to work a specific way so that others create chances or score, instead of being the one made responsible to do so.
I think his record was better at Liverpool.
 
He scored 7 in 35 in the league last season, assists I'm not sure. So the numbers will probably end up being better at City this season.
He played as striker for us last season aswell didnt he if thats one thing to compare.
 
I watched the City v Spurs game yesterday in the pub and there were loads of City fans who all think they were robbed by us. I think the majority of them are correct in saying that his true value is about £25m. He was terrible yesterday. I would choose Firmino even if they were both available at the same price.
 
I watched the City v Spurs game yesterday in the pub and there were loads of City fans who all think they were robbed by us. I think the majority of them are correct in saying that his true value is about £25m. He was terrible yesterday. I would choose Firmino even if they were both available at the same price.

Raheem Sterling is the least of their worries when you've spent £70m on Otamendi and Mangala
 
Thats your argument?Goals scored.

The point was Sterling plays next David Silva, Aguero, De Bruyne. While Firmino has played next to Lallana, Benteke, Milner for the most part of the season.
Sterling averages about 2 shots pr game while Firmino averages 1,8. Firmino also averages more key passes pr game.

Before the 6-0 yesterday that City attack had scored nearly 20 goals more than us.
So the point is, you have a different platform to perform when being part of that City attack compared to us.
Well it was your argument, you bought out the stats, you were implying that despite the fact that Firmino plays as a striker and Sterling doesn't, you can ignore that because Sterling plays in a better attacking unit, well the example of Defoe and De Bruyne proves that that's rubbish, because i doubt anyone in there right mind thinks Defoe is the better, despite what the goal stats say (I didnt bother to find the assists stats, it wasnt really relevant for my point anyway)
 
Firmino.. He is going to immense next Season.. the silky basterd...

Anyway, Id prefer him at the club, just because he does things like this.. he so knew what he was doing here..

Whereas Sterling is a Wannabe Gangster prick...

CIVFF-2WIAAb6LO.jpg
There's that fucking Greek tattoo "Ο θεός είναι πιστός" "god is a believer". Perhaps he's telling us god believes in him?
 
Well it was your argument, you bought out the stats, you were implying that despite the fact that Firmino plays as a striker and Sterling doesn't, you can ignore that because Sterling plays in a better attacking unit, well the example of Defoe and De Bruyne proves that that's rubbish, because i doubt anyone in there right mind thinks Defoe is the better, despite what the goal stats say (I didnt bother to find the assists stats, it wasnt really relevant for my point anyway)

I'm still not sure what your saying tbh. I compared their stats in terms of both goals and assists so far this season as Firmino has done a lot better then some think.
I certainly didnt mean that those goals tip it in either players favour when it comes to who is better.
Thats why your Defoe/ De Bruyne post was lost on me.

Firmino has played half his games as a forward/striker btw.
 
Right now it is little harsh to compare Firmino and Sterling, considering age and experience. No doubt, right now I would go for Firmino over Sterling. But I am little worried, under Pep Sterling will go on to become the player we dreamed of coming from our youth team.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom