Fact of the matter is that crappy players make it into top teams all the time. On that basis, there's no reason to doubt that any of our youth players won't make it for lack of athleticism. Lack of technique is valid, but athleticism can be developed. At the top level, while athleticism is important, technique is of greater value. Look at mid table and lower, athleticism is the most valuable asset.
If you want players whose primary skill is technique though, there are tons popping up of late. Oscar, Coutinho, Mata, Cazorla, Ozil, etc etc. I'd say Suso/Texeira are in the same pace bracket.
I consider Luis Alberto as more of a CF/Second Striker type at the moment. He has a good eye for the pass, and a really good build. Watch the last bit of our first match against Spurs, he creates our last two goals. Smart pass to play Suarez in, and then does really well to win the ball and find Suarez in space again, who goes on to pick a pass to put Sterling through.
He's definitely an interesting one though, because he has a fantastic shot and good finishing ability, as we've seen, and also can play with the ball. I think there's a few ways to develop him from here.
It's unconventional, but I kinda like the first option. I can see him developing into a version of Sergio Busquets with a bit more attacking threat. It's hard to see exactly where he fits in at the moment, but it's feasible that he can contribute in two striker sets with Suarez or Sturridge.
- A bit like we did with Lucas, mould him as a deep CDM/CM with a wicked shot. In our free flowing system, this could be a great option.
- Move him a bit further up to play as a (sometimes lone) Striker. It remains to be seen if he has the positional awareness in the attacking third to compensate for his lack of pace.
- Move him back to the hole to play as a CF/CAM. Probably the ideal position, but the issue is that we have Suso/Texeira/Coutinho also for that position. He's shown some ability on the ball to suit this position, but we need to see more to know if he can really handle this position.
I think it's far too glib to simply claim that athleticism can be developed. It makes no sense: if we accept that athleticism is important in football, and that it can be developed, then it follows that all footballers would be athletic, because they have every incentive to maximise their attributes. But there are clear differences between footballers in terms of athleticism, so it must be that training can improve a player's athleticism but not nearly enough to equalise for natural differences among players. And since football is a competitive sport, and what matters is relative abilities and not absolute abilities, then that state of affairs is therefore a problem for those less naturally athletic.
Clearly Suso's physcial deficiencies are not a total bar to success with us, but they are a disadvantage. His technical level is going to have to be that much better to compensate.
Luis Alberto: it's an interesting idea to try him deeper. Tbh I haven't (have any of us?) seen enough of him to really have a strong opinion on how he might develop. He looks like a creative passer, and as you say, a good eye for goal. You'd tend to think therefore that he should be kept fairly close to goal, but I suppose it's too early to say.