I wonder if the UK press will hound him out of the country now.
To Arsenal?
I wonder if the UK press will hound him out of the country now.
Lukaku will be after a big money move; imho that rules out Atleti & the Italian clubs. Psg is definitely a possibility, as are City & Chelsea, but no guaranteed starts, leaving only United who are desperate for a clinical striker.Considering how he played with Mourinho and how he's played with Hiddinik, likely destination: PSG, Atleti, or some club in Italy.
Lukaku will be after a big money move; imho that rules out Atleti & the Italian clubs. Psg is definitely a possibility, as are City & Chelsea, but no guaranteed starts, leaving only United who are desperate for a clinical striker.
I wonder if the UK press will hound him out of the country now.
Agreed, Suarez brought much of it, if not all, on himself.Yeah, that's why Suarez left. Hounded out, he was.
Agreed, Suarez brought much of it, if not all, on himself.
Agreed, Suarez brought much of it, if not all, on himself.
Well, Barca were looking at him at Ajax but dropped out after his bite and suspension there. We only got the chance of signing him because of it. It's bonkers to think he deliberately bites people to make himself a more attractive signing.
I should have said try, because I don't think he left because of them, he left because of Barcelona, however the press demonised him and clearly wanted him gone, it's interesting to see how Diego's bite has received such little attention comparatively.Yeah, that's why Suarez left. Hounded out, he was.
Agreed, Suarez brought much of it, if not all, on himself.
I should have said try, because I don't think he left because of them, he left because of Barcelona, however the press demonised him and clearly wanted him gone, it's interesting to see how Diego's bite has received such little attention comparatively.
Much of what? If (as I would agree) Suarez wasn't hounded out, there was no "it" to "bring on himself" in the first place. I do agree with Mystic to the extent that there were accusations that Suarez was a worse diver than anyone else, which was garbage. He did dive, but no more than lots of other players.
Correct. He isn't even a dirty player. In his career he lost his head three times. That is more or less one time every third year. He don't do reckless tackles, elbows in the head, headbutting and things like that. As you say, he dives but not more than anyone else. He is one of the best team players ever and I have never seen a better leader on the pitch.
The Evra gate, well, no evidence at all. Evra changed his story a few times. That says it all. No camera picked up anything. Strange that considering that the final version that Evra probably imagined up was that Suarez had run after him and shouted the racist word a few times. Not a single fan at the ground had heard anything.
I find it amazing how every liverpool fan ignores the fact that when Suarez denied calling Evra a nigger , he explained it to the ref by saying he called him negro instead.
Suarez's own words were the evidence.
If you ban someone for racism then you must be 100% sure, not 99%. The reason is that the player must live with that his/her whole life. If he comes back playing in the PL then it is now ok by to call him a racist because the FA found him guilty. The media can call him that because of that for example. The fans can call him a racist.
Get ready for some lolsOh no. It's the Suarez racism discussion with added Arn.
He called him a 'negrito' - Which while it refers to someone of darker skin in Uruguay it's supposed to be an affectionate term (according to Gus Poyet anyway) I don't know how true that is or whether it justifies him in anyway but I just thought I'd throw it out there. Having said he must have known he'd take it badly.
Well you're the solicitor so you'd know. A quick check on wiki I found this.Nope. Negrito isn't mentioned a single time by Suarez in evidence.
It was only mentioned in an lfc press release
You may say he has this posting malarkey down to a T.Fantastic first post !
Well you're the solicitor so you'd know. A quick check on wiki I found this.
However, in Spanish-speaking countries where there are fewer people of West African slave origin, such as Argentina and Uruguay, negro (negra for females) is commonly used to refer to partners, close friends[17] or people in general, independent of skin color.
It's all muchness of a muchness though - In this country it's a racist term and he must have known that. Plus it's a fucking dull topic. I want Arn to post again so I can threaten him with my tongue..