• You may have to login or register before you can post and view our exclusive members only forums.
    To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Carra: it's 2002 all over again

Status
Not open for further replies.
Show me where i said it was not significant.

Show me one place i said that.

No wait, you can't. Because that's not what i said. A great habit some of you have of making your own interpretations of what's actually being said.

I did not say it was not a significant achievement. It was. What i said was that Rafa has been living off it since. And the facts of the matter are that we had an incredible amount of luck on our run to the final(well deserved given the previous 15 years), and that 13 or 14 of the final squad were Houllier's players. Since Rafa built his own team he has won nothing and had he not won the CL then it would be more than a minority calling for his head.
 
Ah, the Rafa was lucky when Liverpool win something but he's shite when Liverpool are playing badly argument.
 
[quote author=Red Mullet link=topic=37397.msg999248#msg999248 date=1259209229]
Ah, the Rafa was lucky when Liverpool win something but he's shite when Liverpool are playing badly argument.

[/quote]

Exactly.

We're the only team in the history of time to have won the Champions League with the aid of a bit of luck.
 
[quote author=Doc_Rule link=topic=37397.msg999245#msg999245 date=1259206800]
Show me where i said it was not significant.

Show me one place i said that.

No wait, you can't. Because that's not what i said. A great habit some of you have of making your own interpretations of what's actually being said.

I did not say it was not a significant achievement. It was. What i said was that Rafa has been living off it since. And the facts of the matter are that we had an incredible amount of luck on our run to the final(well deserved given the previous 15 years), and that 13 or 14 of the final squad were Houllier's players. Since Rafa built his own team he has won nothing and had he not won the CL then it would be more than a minority calling for his head.
[/quote]

I'm sorry you feel uncomfortable with the perfectly logical result of your own argument. Actually I'm not, you should feel uncomfortable with it, because it's vile.

You were making an argument that Rafa hasn't achieved anything with his own players. This wasn't satisfying enough for your overstated polemic, so you went further, and stated that largest achievement he does have, in winning the CL, was the "luckiest ever". You are obviously making a case against Rafa, and you feel as though in order to do so, you have to diminish his contribution toward his major success, and achieve this by calling it the "luckiest ever". In calling something not just lucky, but the luckiest thing of its kind in history, you elevate the whim of chance, and you neccesarily reduce the role of personal actions.

Unfortunately, in so doing, you inevitably give less credit not just to the manager but to the team for achieving what they did with what they had at the time. We played absolutely perfectly in several games, including games without our best players, and we needed to against superior team after superior team on the way to that final. It was an absolutely fantastic achievement for those players, not for god, the cosmos, karma, or luck. When you attribute success to luck, you remove rightful credit from will and execution. "We deserve it because of the last 15 years" NO! There aren't rewards for failure. The team and Rafa deserve it. FSP deserved it for that substitute performance, Igor deserved it for playing his best game ever on the worlds largest club stage. You reduce the significance of our victory by attributing it to some unknown metaphysical force. Usually it is the bitter loser that posits this, and as luck is a totally unknowable, unquantifiable, immeasurable, and perhaps non-existent thing, it is likewise difficult to dismiss once the bare assertion is made.

But we aren't the bitter loser. We fucking won. And at a time where we are losing, you can refrain from mischaracterizing our famous wins.

And, if you want to make a decent case against Rafa, you probably don't want to bring luck to bear, as you'll then have to forgive others when they use it with regard to injuries, beachballs etc and elevate it over the real decision making that left our squad thin in the first place.
 
Yeah but Fark... show me where he said it was not significant. Show me one word that he typed that said that, or supports that statement. You can't Fark. you're just making interpretations of what he said.

Show me, because I'm a fucking nauseating pedantic cunt*, and I'm desperate to know.



*I'm attacking myself, obviously. No rules against that.
 
I should add as a caveat Fark, that if you cannot point out this single bit of irrefutable evidence that supports your point, then I am the winner, and you're reduced to being Wrong, Again! you shit-deducing, weak-argument-supporting, Sun-reader.

-wanks into own faeces-
 
[quote author=Ryan link=topic=37397.msg999249#msg999249 date=1259210202]
[quote author=Red Mullet link=topic=37397.msg999248#msg999248 date=1259209229]
Ah, the Rafa was lucky when Liverpool win something but he's shite when Liverpool are playing badly argument.

[/quote]

Exactly.

We're the only team in the history of time to have won the Champions League with the aid of a bit of luck.
[/quote]

Did i say that?
 
[quote author=Ryan link=topic=37397.msg999253#msg999253 date=1259211965]
I should add as a caveat Fark, that if you cannot point out this single bit of irrefutable evidence that supports your point, then I am the winner, and you're reduced to being Wrong, Again! you shit-deducing, weak-argument-supporting, S**-reader.

-wanks into own faeces-
[/quote]

Well you're showing your true colours now. Well done.
 
[quote author=Farkmaster link=topic=37397.msg999251#msg999251 date=1259211241]
[quote author=Doc_Rule link=topic=37397.msg999245#msg999245 date=1259206800]
Show me where i said it was not significant.

Show me one place i said that.

No wait, you can't. Because that's not what i said. A great habit some of you have of making your own interpretations of what's actually being said.

I did not say it was not a significant achievement. It was. What i said was that Rafa has been living off it since. And the facts of the matter are that we had an incredible amount of luck on our run to the final(well deserved given the previous 15 years), and that 13 or 14 of the final squad were Houllier's players. Since Rafa built his own team he has won nothing and had he not won the CL then it would be more than a minority calling for his head.
[/quote]

I'm sorry you feel uncomfortable with the perfectly logical result of your own argument. Actually I'm not, you should feel uncomfortable with it, because it's vile.

You were making an argument that Rafa hasn't achieved anything with his own players. This wasn't satisfying enough for your overstated polemic, so you went further, and stated that largest achievement he does have, in winning the CL, was the "luckiest ever". You are obviously making a case against Rafa, and you feel as though in order to do so, you have to diminish his contribution toward his major success, and achieve this by calling it the "luckiest ever". In calling something not just lucky, but the luckiest thing of its kind in history, you elevate the whim of chance, and you neccesarily reduce the role of personal actions.

Unfortunately, in so doing, you inevitably give less credit not just to the manager but to the team for achieving what they did with what they had at the time. We played absolutely perfectly in several games, including games without our best players, and we needed to against superior team after superior team on the way to that final. It was an absolutely fantastic achievement for those players, not for god, the cosmos, karma, or luck. When you attribute success to luck, you remove rightful credit from will and execution. "We deserve it because of the last 15 years" NO! There aren't rewards for failure. The team and Rafa deserve it. FSP deserved it for that substitute performance, Igor deserved it for playing his best game ever on the worlds largest club stage. You reduce the significance of our victory by attributing it to some unknown metaphysical force. Usually it is the bitter loser that posits this, and as luck is a totally unknowable, unquantifiable, immeasurable, and perhaps non-existent thing, it is likewise difficult to dismiss once the bare assertion is made.

But we aren't the bitter loser. We fucking won. And at a time where we are losing, you can refrain from mischaracterizing our famous wins.

And, if you want to make a decent case against Rafa, you probably don't want to bring luck to bear, as you'll then have to forgive others when they use it with regard to injuries, beachballs etc and elevate it over the real decision making that left our squad thin in the first place.

[/quote]

Yawn.

Typical.

You think that by ranting and repeating tired and boring inaccurate opinions of your fellow sheep that it proves me wrong?

No, you're more likely to pretend i said something completely different because then you can put your Rafa fanclub hat on again and give more one-sided bolox arguments to try and beat down anyone that doesn't look at the world through the same tinted glasses as you do.

You're incredibly hypocritical. You throw tantrums because i apparently belittle Rafa's achievements(when i'm actually putting them in context) and your way of counter-arguing the points is over-rate and deify Rafa and everything he does.

You should take your own advice for a change. Stop posting your opinion as fact. You love to brow-beat over it, well practice what you breach.

If you can name me one team that had more luck in a run to a CL win than us, i'd like to hear it.
 
[quote author=Doc_Rule link=topic=37397.msg999261#msg999261 date=1259212648]
[quote author=Farkmaster link=topic=37397.msg999251#msg999251 date=1259211241]
[quote author=Doc_Rule link=topic=37397.msg999245#msg999245 date=1259206800]
Show me where i said it was not significant.

Show me one place i said that.

No wait, you can't. Because that's not what i said. A great habit some of you have of making your own interpretations of what's actually being said.

I did not say it was not a significant achievement. It was. What i said was that Rafa has been living off it since. And the facts of the matter are that we had an incredible amount of luck on our run to the final(well deserved given the previous 15 years), and that 13 or 14 of the final squad were Houllier's players. Since Rafa built his own team he has won nothing and had he not won the CL then it would be more than a minority calling for his head.
[/quote]

I'm sorry you feel uncomfortable with the perfectly logical result of your own argument. Actually I'm not, you should feel uncomfortable with it, because it's vile.

You were making an argument that Rafa hasn't achieved anything with his own players. This wasn't satisfying enough for your overstated polemic, so you went further, and stated that largest achievement he does have, in winning the CL, was the "luckiest ever". You are obviously making a case against Rafa, and you feel as though in order to do so, you have to diminish his contribution toward his major success, and achieve this by calling it the "luckiest ever". In calling something not just lucky, but the luckiest thing of its kind in history, you elevate the whim of chance, and you neccesarily reduce the role of personal actions.

Unfortunately, in so doing, you inevitably give less credit not just to the manager but to the team for achieving what they did with what they had at the time. We played absolutely perfectly in several games, including games without our best players, and we needed to against superior team after superior team on the way to that final. It was an absolutely fantastic achievement for those players, not for god, the cosmos, karma, or luck. When you attribute success to luck, you remove rightful credit from will and execution. "We deserve it because of the last 15 years" NO! There aren't rewards for failure. The team and Rafa deserve it. FSP deserved it for that substitute performance, Igor deserved it for playing his best game ever on the worlds largest club stage. You reduce the significance of our victory by attributing it to some unknown metaphysical force. Usually it is the bitter loser that posits this, and as luck is a totally unknowable, unquantifiable, immeasurable, and perhaps non-existent thing, it is likewise difficult to dismiss once the bare assertion is made.

But we aren't the bitter loser. We fucking won. And at a time where we are losing, you can refrain from mischaracterizing our famous wins.

And, if you want to make a decent case against Rafa, you probably don't want to bring luck to bear, as you'll then have to forgive others when they use it with regard to injuries, beachballs etc and elevate it over the real decision making that left our squad thin in the first place.

[/quote]

Yawn.

Typical.

You think that by ranting and repeating tired and boring inaccurate opinions of your fellow sheep that it proves me wrong?

No, you're more likely to pretend i said something completely different because then you can put your Rafa fanclub hat on again and give more one-sided bolox arguments to try and beat down anyone that doesn't look at the world through the same tinted glasses as you do.

You're incredibly hypocritical. You throw tantrums because i apparently belittle Rafa's achievements(when i'm actually putting them in context) and your way of counter-arguing the points is over-rate and deify Rafa and everything he does.

If you can name me one team that had more luck in a run to a CL win than us, i'd like to hear it.
[/quote]

This is gonne be interesting, cos if Fark can't name one team then you're the winner Doc. Again!
 
Who's talking to you?? Why don't you just run along little boy. If you want to talk football, then do it. If not, jog on.
 
Doc - your insistence on ignoring all rationale put in front of you (by plenty of people), zero'ing in on one point from any given argument, and demanding proof that it is ir isn't true, the outcome of which will determine in your solitary warped mind that you're the winner or not is fucking everyone's problem.

Bar spammers, Rashid, and reincarnations of old posters, I can't think of anyone who's made a more inauspicious start to their time on this site. Whether you deem yourself to be 100% right or not, you've pretty much ruined every thread you've participated in with your fucking nauseating polemic.

Now, take it from someone who's a fucking expert at these things - if you carry on like this, you will get banned. You will. No usually, I'd steer clear of passing on such advice, given that this is a forum, and there's plenty of other things to concern one's self with, but the Internet seems to be your life, you raison d'etre, your fucking everything Doc.

You've got a few options as far as I can see:
- Carry on as you're going, and you'll be banned within a matter of days.
- Leave of your own accord, and go back to whatever downtrodden forum you were previously inhabitating.
- Or, fucking shut up, and stop runing every single thread going with your monotonous nit-picking diatribe.

We're a decent bunch once you get to know us, and I of course don't speak for everyone, but I fail to see (in my own opinion of course) one poster on this site who wouldn't happily see the back of you.

Sup to you really.
 
[quote author=Doc_Rule link=topic=37397.msg999261#msg999261 date=1259212648]
Yawn.

Typical.

You think that by ranting and repeating tired and boring inaccurate opinions of your fellow sheep that it proves me wrong?

No, you're more likely to pretend i said something completely different because then you can put your Rafa fanclub hat on again and give more one-sided bolox arguments to try and beat down anyone that doesn't look at the world through the same tinted glasses as you do.

You're incredibly hypocritical. You throw tantrums because i apparently belittle Rafa's achievements(when i'm actually putting them in context) and your way of counter-arguing the points is over-rate and deify Rafa and everything he does.

You should take your own advice for a change. Stop posting your opinion as fact. You love to brow-beat over it, well practice what you breach.

If you can name me one team that had more luck in a run to a CL win than us, i'd like to hear it.
[/quote]

I (for some unknown reason to me) explored why stating that something is "the luckiest ever" is to necessarily diminish it. This is what you had a problem with, so that's what I explained. I wasn't ranting, I calmly argued what your logic necessarily means. That isn't putting words in your mouth, its following your own logic to its own end.

You haven't provided any substantive response to that argument, because you can't. Instead you say I'm tantruming, as opposed to amusing myself by exploring the logic behind your own statement. So, with my statement standing unrebutted by argument, we move on.

What are we on to now?

Oh, you propose to have an argument where I have to disprove something you asserted but didn't prove. This is the fallacy of argument from the negative. Why do I have the burden of proof here? What is this fallacious argument about? Ah, it's about whether one thing is luckier than another, whether one thing has more of an ethereal characteristic than another. This ethereal characteristic, called luck, as I stated previously, can't be quantified, or known. So we are going to have a fallacious argument using an unknown fallacious premise? No thanks.
 
Comical stuff.

You're definition of "rationale" is whatever you deem it to be. Not the actual truth. But whatever a closed off community has decided the truth is.

I'm not the one who zero's in on points at all. i think if you'd actually open your eyes and read every post instead of just continually obsessing over mine you'd see that i do it response to specific highlighting of issues by others. I said we were the luckiest CL winners ever. That's my opinion. Fark jumped up and down and threw a tantrum and proclaimed that to be a vile statement and that all winners have luck. All i asked for was one example of a team luckier than us.

On the Arbeloa issue, i stated, factually, that he had said in a televised interview that he wanted to stay. Lots of tantrums and claims that i couldn't back it up and that it was well known that he wanted to leave and that i was posting my opinion as fact. All i asked for was one reliable source to prove me wrong. None were produced thus showing that i was not the one posting my opinion as fact.

I'm not the one ruining threads. You are. Following me around, refusing to discuss the topic at hand for more than 30 seconds because at the first time that anyone(meaning me) disagrees with you, you start throwing personal insults and ruining threads with your nonsense and your "if i agree with you will you go away" bullshit.

As for my inauspicious start to my time on this site, i think if you take your head from your arse and actually read back through threads you'll find that it was yourself and your merry band of miscreants that began the abuse and the name calling and the conspiracy nonsense.

And i think you might just find that you're as close if not closer to getting banned than i am.

So don't talk to me, don't reply to my posts. Just jog on past because it's nothing to do with you.
 
[quote author=Farkmaster link=topic=37397.msg999268#msg999268 date=1259213988]
[quote author=Doc_Rule link=topic=37397.msg999261#msg999261 date=1259212648]
Yawn.

Typical.

You think that by ranting and repeating tired and boring inaccurate opinions of your fellow sheep that it proves me wrong?

No, you're more likely to pretend i said something completely different because then you can put your Rafa fanclub hat on again and give more one-sided bolox arguments to try and beat down anyone that doesn't look at the world through the same tinted glasses as you do.

You're incredibly hypocritical. You throw tantrums because i apparently belittle Rafa's achievements(when i'm actually putting them in context) and your way of counter-arguing the points is over-rate and deify Rafa and everything he does.

You should take your own advice for a change. Stop posting your opinion as fact. You love to brow-beat over it, well practice what you breach.

If you can name me one team that had more luck in a run to a CL win than us, i'd like to hear it.
[/quote]

I (for some unknown reason to me) explored why stating that something is "the luckiest ever" is to necessarily diminish it. This is what you had a problem with, so that's what I explained. I wasn't ranting, I calmly argued what your logic necessarily means. That isn't putting words in your mouth, its following your own logic to its own end.

You haven't provided any substantive response to that argument, because you can't. Instead you say I'm tantruming, as opposed to amusing myself by exploring the logic behind your own statement. So, with my statement standing unrebutted by argument, we move on.

What are we on to now?

Oh, you propose to have an argument where I have to disprove something you asserted but didn't prove. This is the fallacy of argument from the negative. Why do I have the burden of proof here? What is this fallacious argument about? Ah, it's about whether one thing is luckier than another, whether one thing has more of an ethereal characteristic than another. This ethereal characteristic, called luck, as I stated previously, can't be quantified, or known. So we are going to have a fallacious argument using an unknown fallacious premise? No thanks.
[/quote]

I haven't proved we got lucky?? I wasn't aware that you were all so closed off from society that you need me to.

I could list dozens of examples but rather than ramble i'll just stick with three.

1) Garcia's "goal" vs Chelski.
2) Gudjonsson's miss in the last minute of the same game
3) Dudek's save from Shevchenko in the CL final.

Luck luck and more luck.

It's not in anyway diminishing the achievement, at least that's not my intention, It's putting it in context. Is anyone here actually going to claim that we were the best team in Europe that season?? Does nobody remember we finished 5th that same season? Did we conquer Europe because we were the best team?? No we did not. That was proven as we finished 5th in the premiership. Did Rafa overcome Lippi, Mourinho and Ancelotti because he was a better manager than them? No he did not. In the case of Mourinho and Ancelotti they have proven themselves to be superior to Rafa time after time. And Lippi is on another level.
 
1) There isn't definitive evidence that Garcia's goal didn't cross the line, and even if it didn't, Cech should have been sent off as I recall, so either way we'd have a significant advantage.
2) Gudjonsson failed to execute. If missing shots is lucky, then you'll be pleased to admit we are unlucky when Kuyt/Gerrard didn't score this last game, as opposed to both being well off form.
3) Dudek made a fantastic save, and Shevchenko made a poor finish which he knew was poor, hence his absolutely crippled confidence from that point forward.

Of course we weren't close to the best team in Europe. That's what makes the achievement even more notable. Are you confusing something that is improbable with something that is incredibly lucky?

You can't just list things that happened, you have to explain why they are definitely attributable to "luck". This is a metaphysical question.
 
Dudek flung his arm in the air and luckily the ball made contact. He knew nothing about it.

Forget that Gudjonsson missed and watch the shot. A second earlier it hits or defender, Riise i think, and ricochet's into the net, a second later it hits Drogba and goes in. Luck.

There's no evidence to suggest it did go in either. And there's also no way of telling whether the referee would have sent Cech off or not. And, our penalty taker at the time was a Mr. S. Gerrard who had blazed quite a few penalty wide up to that point.

You have again ignored the main part of a post.

Do you think we won the Champions League because we were the best team in Europe that season?
 
[quote author=Doc_Rule link=topic=37397.msg999278#msg999278 date=1259215628]
You have again ignored the main part of a post.

Do you think we won the Champions League because we were the best team in Europe that season?
[/quote]

I'll ignore your jaunt into the increasingly ludicrously hypothetical then, and address the main part, which I thought I did when I said: Of course we weren't close to the best team in Europe. That's what makes the achievement even more notable. Are you confusing something that is improbable with something that is incredibly lucky?

Who is ignoring parts of a post?
 
Christ, this is tedious. If we can't ban this idiot, why don't we leave 6CM to him and we can all set up a splinter website where we don't have to suffer his boring drivel. Then he can say he won and deride us all as '6CM rejects' and have long, pedantic conversations with himself.

And then Glock can c&p his posts on our new website, and Fark can discover this and we can repeat history forever and ever...
 
[quote author=Doc_Rule link=topic=37397.msg999261#msg999261 date=1259212648]

If you can name me one team that had more luck in a run to a CL win than us, i'd like to hear it.
[/quote]

I thought Man Utd were lucky in 99. Bayern Munich hit the bar. Two late goals after being dominated throughout the game.
 
[quote author=TheBunnyman link=topic=37397.msg999449#msg999449 date=1259238414]
Christ, this is tedious. If we can't ban this idiot, why don't we leave 6CM to him and we can all set up a splinter website where we don't have to suffer his boring drivel. Then he can say he won and deride us all as '6CM rejects' and have long, pedantic conversations with himself.

And then Glock can c&p his posts on our new website, and Fark can discover this and we can repeat history forever and ever...

[/quote]

x 2.

Thanky you very much, Farky.
 
[quote author=Doped White Mouse link=topic=37397.msg999534#msg999534 date=1259247727]
[quote author=TheBunnyman link=topic=37397.msg999449#msg999449 date=1259238414]
Christ, this is tedious. If we can't ban this idiot, why don't we leave 6CM to him and we can all set up a splinter website where we don't have to suffer his boring drivel. Then he can say he won and deride us all as '6CM rejects' and have long, pedantic conversations with himself.

And then Glock can c&p his posts on our new website, and Fark can discover this and we can repeat history forever and ever...

[/quote]

x 2.

Thanky you very much, Farky.
[/quote]

He's gone from the forum.
 
[quote author=Sunny link=topic=37397.msg999544#msg999544 date=1259248839]
[quote author=Doped White Mouse link=topic=37397.msg999534#msg999534 date=1259247727]
[quote author=TheBunnyman link=topic=37397.msg999449#msg999449 date=1259238414]
Christ, this is tedious. If we can't ban this idiot, why don't we leave 6CM to him and we can all set up a splinter website where we don't have to suffer his boring drivel. Then he can say he won and deride us all as '6CM rejects' and have long, pedantic conversations with himself.

And then Glock can c&p his posts on our new website, and Fark can discover this and we can repeat history forever and ever...

[/quote]

x 2.

Thanky you very much, Farky.
[/quote]

He's gone from the forum.
[/quote]

Who? Farky?
 
[quote author=TheBunnyman link=topic=37397.msg999551#msg999551 date=1259249352]
Good.

And Fark, next time you get a parcel from Pandora, don't fucking open it!
[/quote]

hahaha
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom