Meh
P.S. Liverpool have agreed to pay Villa the money and Benteke is set to have a medical. Again. And again. And again and again...
Entirely depends on how he doesBentekkers is woeful. Benteskey is brilliant.
Love your attitude, mate. I was not in favor of spending the Sterling money on Benteke either, but now that's it's a done deal, let's be constructive and see how it can work. I like the "diamond" idea; seeing this front 6 (plus Clyne and Moreno/Gomez providing width from the flanks) fills me with a lot more optimism than the 4-3-3/4-5-1 with Benteke as the lone striker, which is what we mostly see in the media as our future formation. A trio of floaty wingers/AMs behind one target man may sound logical at first, but Benteke is much worse than Ibra, Lewandowski or even Giroud at bringing teammates into play and our wingers/AMs don't pose enough of a consistent goal threat to make this formation truly effective.
Of course Coutinho needs to be the playmaker pulling the strings in the middle and both Milner and Henderson will start the majority of games in CM. For the DM position, I would suggest Can; another option would be to play him at the middle of 3 CBs (the Beckenbauer role). And when we need to freshen things up in attack, the likes of Lallana, Markovic, and Ibe can come on for one of the strikers (or both) and get busy running at the tired defenders. This might all still work, especially if Firmino hits the ground running.
I'd really like Benteskey to stick.
If it sticks it means we've pissed 32.5 million up the wall. Which won't be ideal. Still, you'll have coined a name that a small collective of work-shy forumites use to refer to this waste of space. I suppose we can all take some solace in that.
im not sure but i do believe the credit for the moniker bentheskey lies with moi.
Yeah it may well do. I'm referring to Benteskey rather than Bentheskey though.
You're a good ladBentesky is one of the worst suggestions ever. Awful.
Bentekkers though, thats alright.