Doesn't make it right.And tens of thousands other Liverpool fans
Doesn't make it right.And tens of thousands other Liverpool fans
And tens of thousands other Liverpool fans
Every silly season I read comments about how the players we go after aren't good enough for us, while the superstars (that we also chase) who are good enough simply choose to play elsewhere for a variety of reasons, I see our manager / owner / club get slaughtered for it (often for things beyond their control, like the fact that Liverpool isn't London and that South Americans dream of playing in Spain, not Lancashire) and I thank jeebus that the internet didn't exist when we signed unproven, lesser players from shitty teams in the past... Like Ian Rush. And Alan Hansen. And John Aldridge. And Ronnie Whelan. And Jan Molby. And Steve Nicol. Etc...
*wipes sarcasm off the forum*You're so wise Whaddapie. I'm sure you would have been there to explain the error of our ways.
You're so wise Whaddapie. I'm sure you would have been there to explain the error of our ways.
Was waiting for you there, Gene - Surprised it took you so long. Well in. Clever and sharp as ever, your highness.
A transfer thread is never, ever complete without a post of Whaddapie's ilk.
It's like football hasn't changed. Out of sight.
A lot has been made of this 'proven premier league striker with a 1 in 2 ratio'
Since we're signing him, I'll try to be constructive. Doomsdaying is too depressive.
We need to revert to the diamond to have success with this:
--------Benteke------Firmino
--------------Coutinho
-------Milner--------Henderson
-------------Lucas/Allen
Need to establish very early the roles each one is going to play. Coutinho needs to continue to be a playmaker. If we try to get him to be a pacy wing-forward, he's going to fail miserably. Let him make that no. 10 position his own. Let Firmino be an out and out striker. Let him know that he doesn't have playmaking duties - he's much more important to us off-the-ball.
Benteke also needs to be told that he needs to be a face-the-goal striker for the most part. I don't want him to try and be the pivot he was at Villa. That will get ugly here very quickly - he's not good enough technically for that, and none of our AMs are runners. He needs to try and be like Hasselbaink - use his pace and power to be a single minded goal machine. Make sure he doesn't try and be anything he's not.
And most importantly, Skrtel needs to be told that Benteke isn't a signpost which says 'launch it here'.
Oh, and if we signed a proper holding mid that would go a long way in alleviating the disruption in the style of play that Benteke might cause.
The manager has to set the team up to play to Benteke's strengths or there's no point playing him. If he want's or expects Benteke to adapt his game to play like Suarez or Sturridge then it isn't going to work so the team has to get more crosses in and try not to play the ball into his feet with his back to goal as that doesn't suit him at all. Also the centre halves need to resist the hoof forwards because he can head the ball as it may be the easy option but that doesn't mean it's the right option.
The manager has to set the team up to play to Benteke's strengths or there's no point playing him. If he want's or expects Benteke to adapt his game to play like Suarez or Sturridge then it isn't going to work so the team has to get more crosses in and try not to play the ball into his feet with his back to goal as that doesn't suit him at all. Also the centre halves need to resist the hoof forwards because he can head the ball as it may be the easy option but that doesn't mean it's the right option.
Love your attitude, mate. I was not in favor of spending the Sterling money on Benteke either, but now that's it's a done deal, let's be constructive and see how it can work. I like the "diamond" idea; seeing this front 6 (plus Clyne and Moreno/Gomez providing width from the flanks) fills me with a lot more optimism than the 4-3-3/4-5-1 with Benteke as the lone striker, which is what we mostly see in the media as our future formation. A trio of floaty wingers/AMs behind one target man may sound logical at first, but Benteke is much worse than Ibra, Lewandowski or even Giroud at bringing teammates into play and our wingers/AMs don't pose enough of a consistent goal threat to make this formation truly effective.
Of course Coutinho needs to be the playmaker pulling the strings in the middle and both Milner and Henderson will start the majority of games in CM. For the DM position, I would suggest Can; another option would be to play him at the middle of 3 CBs (the Beckenbauer role). And when we need to freshen things up in attack, the likes of Lallana, Markovic, and Ibe can come on for one of the strikers (or both) and get busy running at the tired defenders. This might all still work, especially if Firmino hits the ground running.
He probably would yeah. Bas Dost does and he's six foot 5 and not as good.
If true, let's hope we're hunting down alternatives rather sitting around waiting for the player to make up his mind.No quotes
[article=http://www.mirror.co.uk/sport/football/transfer-news/christian-benteke-transfer-liverpool-target-6093464]Benteke, whose £32.5million release clause has been triggered by Liverpool, is thought to favour a club that can give him Champions League football - and that could cause a delay to his Anfield transfer going through.
Belgium international Benteke is hoping one of the top four can offer him a platform on the biggest club stage of them all before he puts pen to paper with the Reds, who will play in the Europa League next season.[/article]
He could have played for Genk, who are in the Champions League every season. So why did he leave? Oh of course, the money at villa was more important than showcasing his rather limited talents in Europe.