[quote author=KHL link=topic=41972.msg1178886#msg1178886 date=1285056828]
The argument to sell Agger beacuse he's 'a luxury in our current situation' does my head in.
Are we indeed becoming Fulhams fans too?
A club of our stature need the best players around and if they're good on the ball too that doesn't disqualify them one bit either.
I know Agger's been bigged up also above his own levels but can we please stop all this his a poor defender shite. He is absolutely not. He may have his flaws, in the air for one, but otherwise he's by a mile the most accomplished defender we've got overall. He's not Carra when it comes to attitude, guts and sheer determination (at least not yet) and he isn't quite as strong as Skrtel perhaps but he's the most accomplished one. Everyone outside Liverpool with half a footballing-brain would agree on this.
So yes we actually SHOULD build our defense around him as Carra is not getting any younger and Skrtel at best is a very decent squad-player. This is why I'm getting increasingly upset with him beeing benched only to be used as Konchesky's back up and I can surely understand his frustrations about it too.
Not saying he should've aired them so soon (or at all) but I can understand where he's coming form.
The most scary apart of it all though is the comments about Roy's preferences in defense. I don't like the sound of that one bit and if there's one thing it's not then it's Liverpool-like. Imagine if Alan Hansen (not saying Agger's his class but there are similiarites for everyone to see) was benched to make way for someone with more grit and power? I know times where different back then but we never should forget that we are still one of the biggest clubs in the world and we are allowed to field 'luxury-players' as long as they are not a liability.
If Agger is indeed beeing lined up to be sold as it seems a lot on here wouldn't mind much *shivers* then be it and I'll bet you that the big ones will be lining up to secure his services. Because he's very good with potential to be awesome. But of course he needs to be played - and not out of position.
I'm keeping my fingers firmly crossed he won't start against Northampton as LB. Then better not at all.
[/quote]
You do make me cringe when you go off on these tirades about Agger. The truth is, Agger has shown very little improvement in his time here, and the longer that continues, the more it looks like hype rather than potential. Couple that with his injury record, and I'd be willing to bet money that if Agger was put up for sale, none of the top four would be interested in him, unless it was for a significantly deflated fee. That's because he represents a risk, and one that many would be reluctant to take. It's hardly worked out for us thus far, has it?
Of course, a large part of the problem is that we can't afford to have two defenders who are weak in the air. So unless you're partnering Agger with Sami's clone, then whichever partnership we field, it's going to be susceptible to being beaten in the air. I'm inclined to think that Carragher remains our best defender, so we should therefore be looking for another defender to partner him who dominates in the air. If Agger is still here when Carra finally gives way, then perhaps he'd be the ideal partner for this player.
Until then, he really needs to do his talking on the pitch.