[quote author=Fabio link=topic=41972.msg1178604#msg1178604 date=1285009610]
[quote author=keniget link=topic=41972.msg1178573#msg1178573 date=1285007677]
[quote author=Fabio link=topic=41972.msg1178469#msg1178469 date=1285000036]
[quote author=keniget link=topic=41972.msg1178467#msg1178467 date=1284999879]
Why does Agger require a more defensive RB in the team?
[/quote]
he likes to push up more does agger, or rather, bring the ball out. With an attacking RB we are potentially leaving ourselves very short handed at the back
[/quote]
I disagree. Firstly, it isn't Agger who would have to be covering for Johnson directly as he plays on the left side of defence, he would be compensating indirectly. Secondly, we employ defensive midfielders whose job it is to cover the gaps - Poulsen did this exact job at Sevilla covering for the roaming Alves. Thirdly, I don't see why have a centre-back who is comfortable bringing the ball out means you can't employ attacking fullbacks.... are we trying to suggest that Agger pushes forward leaving Carra all on his own?
[/quote]
you ain't got to tell me, was just guessing that was what whoever said it originally meant
[/quote]
That was what I was suggesting, actually.
In Agger and Johnson, we seem to have defensive players who are more dept or at least more inclined to play in a more attacking form..
I wasn't suggesting that Agger is rquired to cover for JOhnson; but I do have reservations about whether Poulsen is going to be able to provide the defence with as much cover as you seem to be suggesting. In which case Hodson might actually prefer traditional CB's like Carra and Skrtel..
Don't get me wrong, I do think Agger is the more complet defender..I'm just trying to see if there are rational reasons for Agger's benching by Hodgson.