• You may have to login or register before you can post and view our exclusive members only forums.
    To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

United & Ferguson

Status
Not open for further replies.
Manchester Uniteds team at the weekend cost £169m
Manchester Citys team at the weekend cost 162m

Dont believe the hype.
De gea
Rooney
Rio
Nani
Young
Berbatov
Anderson
Carrick etc
All cost a fucking fortune.
Stoke must've assembled some squad then outspending United and all....
 
I have recently read that they prepare to spunk +£100M in the upcoming transfer window. It'll take some world class managerial talent to unearth talent on a shoe-string budget like that.

We all know Ferguson is a great manager, one of the greatest even, but it's kind of infuriating to read these kind of 'blind praisals' of the man.

Not only has he had some of the best British players under his wings for the last 15 years in Giggs, Scholes, Beckham, Keane, Ferdinand, Rooney etc. he's also spend loads on big name players from around the world. Some has been great, some good, some poor and some horrendous. Like most other managers.

And his team of today isn't actually looking particularly good considering the ammount of pounds he's spend. The next £100M will give him a chance to make it right I guess.

Problem being KHL is that even Slurs shit signing have had important parts to play. He gets the dross to play well. I'd KILL for a manager who could do that for us
 
Jeezzeess, the whole argument is based on net spend? And Utd got 80 mill for Ronaldo?? Eh, riiiiight. Well thats ace journalism then..
 
Problem being KHL is that even Slurs shit signing have had important parts to play. He gets the dross to play well. I'd KILL for a manager who could do that for us
That has more to do with the years and years of implementing an 'United-way' if you like I'd say. He took six years to win his first trophy (if I'm not mistaken) and in todays environment that's like a hundred years of poor form. Now he's installed a winning mentality in the team that even rubs off on the Evans and O'Shea's of this world and big cudos for that.

But don't forget that he's had some of the best British born players ever at his disposal combined with massive transfer fees for the likes of Veron, Berbatov, Hargreaves, Anderson (closing in on £100M for those four alone) without being crusified. Because the likes of Carrick, Rooney, Ferdinand, Vidic, Nani, Evra, Ronaldo, Nistelrooy, Park, De Gea, Van Der Sar, Young, Valencia and so on has been more or less succesful. There's another £200M there.

I believe Kenny could do something very similiar to us given the time and financial backing.

But you can see how fans of today acts. Kenny out after his first Season where a mediocre League position, A cup trophy and yet another cup final simply isn't enough to keep the faith. Ryan being one of his fiercest destractors. Would have been a different league now had Uniteds fans/CEO's shown the same lack of patience towards their gaffer back in the 80s.
 
Let wait and see how much Alex spend this summer before we jump the gun.

How much did Rafa spent during the season we got second?
 
Cant find it Ken.
But heres the basis:
De Gea - 17m
Evra - 5.5m
Rio - 30m
Smalling - 12m
Jones - 16.5m
Carrick - 18.5m
Scholes - Free
Rooney - 30m
Young - 17m
Valencia - 16m
Hernandez - 7m

Bench
Berbatov - 30m
Rafael - 18m (with Brother)
Cleverley - free
Park - 7m
Nani - 17m

Not a cheap squad at all.
 
Cant find it Ken.
But heres the basis:
De Gea - 17m
Evra - 5.5m
Rio - 30m
Smalling - 12m
Jones - 16.5m
Carrick - 18.5m
Scholes - Free
Rooney - 30m
Young - 17m
Valencia - 16m
Hernandez - 7m

Bench
Berbatov - 30m
Rafael - 18m (with Brother)
Cleverley - free
Park - 7m
Nani - 17m

Not a cheap squad at all.

Cheers Herr, exactly the point I was making, has more credence coming from you though. Spent fuck all my arse.
 
Uniteds net spend since the Glazers took over is less than Stoke's. It's ninth in the league if I remember correctly.

Only Wenger and Ferguson have managed to maintain competitive teams without a significant net spend. Ats why they will always be better than the likes of Rafa, Redknapp and O'Neill whose teams all fall apart when, the net spend increases run out.

To get back to my favourite study, that most managers dont make an appreciable difference when controlling for other factors - Wenger and Ferguson are the exceptions to the rule in the Premiership. Most improvement comes from spending increases, not managers.
 
Uniteds net spend since the Glazers took over is less than Stoke's. It's ninth in the league if I remember correctly.

Only Wenger and Ferguson have managed to maintain competitive teams without a significant net spend. Ats why they will always be better than the likes of Rafa, Redknapp and O'Neill whose teams all fall apart when, the net spend increases run out.

To get back to my favourite study, that most managers dont make an appreciable difference when controlling for other factors - Wenger and Ferguson are the exceptions to the rule in the Premiership. Most improvement comes from spending increases, not managers.

Ronaldo 80 mill..........
 
Fucking hell. Did they really pay 18M for Rafael and Fabio?

I thought they got them for next to nothing.
 
The Ronaldo thing completely distorts the net spend argument no? Take that out and UTD shoot up the table. How much did our squad cost last weekend? 50p?
 
Why does it distort it?

Does selling Torres distort ours? Does selling Carroll distort Newcastles?

Fact is they only spent 20m of that 80m, the rest did in fact pay off loans and interest. But Fergie just got on with the job.
 
Manchester Uniteds team at the weekend cost £169m
Manchester Citys team at the weekend cost 162m

Dont believe the hype.
De gea
Rooney
Rio
Nani
Young
Berbatov
Anderson
Carrick etc
All cost a fucking fortune.

That's copy and paste to Facebook page material.
 
The Ronaldo thing completely distorts the net spend argument no? Take that out and UTD shoot up the table. How much did our squad cost last weekend? 50p?

Reina - 7m?
Johnson-16m
Agger - 6m
Skrtel - 7m?
Enrique - 6m
Jay- Free
Hendo - 16m
Downing - 18m
Bellamy - Free
Gerrard - Free
Suarez - 22m

Subs -
Doni - ?
Carroll - 35m
maxi - 2m?
kelly free
jonjo 1.5m
kuyt 8m?

Dunno who else there was
So still a lot like
 
Reina - 7m?
Johnson-16m
Agger - 6m
Skrtel - 7m?
Enrique - 6m
Jay- Free
Hendo - 16m
Downing - 18m
Bellamy - Free
Gerrard - Free
Suarez - 22m

Subs -
Doni - ?
Carroll - 35m
maxi - 2m?
kelly free
jonjo 1.5m
kuyt 8m?
Dunno who else there was
So still a lot like

Based on the first team alone, Rio, Rooney, Carrick and De Gea on there own cost more than our entire first team.
 
Only a fool could argue that Ferguson isn't a great manager, it is rather stating the bleedin' obvious.
As Portly says, and has been debated before, he keeps it simple and gets bodies in the box, and knows how to deal with big egos.
 
Some people on this this forum are supporting the wrong team. Seriously, people.

I think it's very legitimate to discuss why United have been so much more successful than us in the last two decades. Unlike Rosco I think the manager has much more to do with it than the amount of money spent, although I wouldn't go so far as to deny that the transfer budget is a factor. In my opinion we have had a succession of poor managers while United have had one good one.

I still believe that they are a bunch of arseholes, nay, the sperm of the Devil.
 
Actually, I think that the players themselves account for a lot more of our results than the manager.
 
Read in some article on the Guardian that in the 4/5 years since the Glazers have taken over that United have spent less on transfers than us, Arsenal, Chelsea, City, Spurs, Aston Villa, Newcastle and Stoke.

That Fergsuon still has that team getting to Champions League Finals and collecting League titles and 89 (likely) points this season is a testament to managerial genius.

That folks is what a proper Manager looks like.

You intimating that Fergie's a good manager? Never knew that.
 
I don't want to get into the debate of Manc's net spend.

However I do admire and detest in equal measures, their absolute lack of complacency, competitive spirit, unquenchable thirst for trophies - year in year out continuously for two decades. There appears to be no end to it. I would say that is as important as a reason as their finances in their ability to remain at the top after Cantona, Keane, Ronaldo, Beckham, Kanchelkis, etc etc left.
 
So United and City Cost 169 and 162 to assemble? And ours cost what 89 Last week. I rest my case.
 
Why does it distort it?

Does selling Torres distort ours? Does selling Carroll distort Newcastles?

Fact is they only spent 20m of that 80m, the rest did in fact pay off loans and interest. But Fergie just got on with the job.

Ross, selling one of the best players in the world for a record amount of course distorts things, even if you count our lucky 50M for Torres, Still a 30M gap.

If only Rafa had the same amount to spend as Fergie, we'd be up high on a mountain now.
(cough)
 
Yup, really.

I should have Sunderland, not Newcastle in my original post. But anyway, here it is...

In total, United's net spend over the past five years amounts to £51.6m. Which is considerably below the £25m per season the Glazers once promised. City's total is £418.9m, Chelsea £155.9m, Liverpool's £83.3m and Tottenham's £66.7m. Perhaps most surprisingly, Sunderland have also spent more than United, with £69.2m, as have Aston Villa on £68.4m. And who would have thought that Stoke, on £59.7m, would be more prolific spenders than England's best-supported club?


selling Ronaldo for 80M might have helped the net spend considerably however.... a somewhat freakishly large sale.... but credit where it is due he has indeed doena very very good job.
 
selling Ronaldo for 80M might have helped the net spend considerably however.... a somewhat freakishly large sale.... but credit where it is due he has indeed doena very very good job.

Aye he has. I'm just saying he has also spent a lot. The winning mentality is just pathological in him, and the fact he has continued to keep united up there, without buying as many marquee players says it all. I don't like the man, as he's a bully but alas I have to respect some of his accomplishments
 
It's still subjective though. They invested in £20m - £30m players over numerous years and also have the benefit of players like Scholes and Giggs still providing experience and quality. When they were spending £30m on Rio, we were creaming ourselves at buying Heskey for £10m. They were already way ahead of the pack and they've reaped the rewards of that for years. Fair play to them and there's no denying we've spent poorly, but they've had a setup there for decades now, stability, finances and a group of players they managed to keep together and fit. Our problems against their success is decades of inconsistency and naivety on and off the pitch. Yes that's continued into this season but one season shouldn't be measured against something that's taken years (and plenty of initial indulgence) to achieve.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom