Fundamentally, Trent will have looked at the deal Madrid did for Mbappe, where they basically recycled the transfer fee they would have paid into huge signing-on fees he wouldn't have got. He'll have thought that he'd like some of that. He might even have hoped he'd get it from Liverpool, but that wasn't going to happen so off he goes.
He won't be the last. This is going to be a trend, and the odd one who ends up on the scrap heap because he does his ACL before he signs a pre-contract isn't going to change that. Frankly I'm amazed it's taken this long. Ballack made a good living out of it.
So what are we going to do? Sit on the moral high ground and accuse Madrid of being cunts and insist that we wouldn't do that sort of thing?
James Milner. Joel Matip. Markus Babbel. To name but three. Not on the same level as Trent, but we still shafted their old clubs (although who cares about shafting City and Bayen) and all of them will have been on inflated wages as a result. Free transfers end up costing the same, and they're harder to back out of when they go wrong as it's hard to shift guys on inflated wages (Joe Cole, for example).
And we've shafted lower league teams and newly relegated-ones by taking their best players on reduced fees, or we've exploited release clauses, and patted ourselves on the back for "seizing an opportunity". We only managed to sign Mo because Roma had to trigger a profit to avoid FFP penalties.
Sorry lads, capitalism rules football. Not saying it's right (it isn't) but that's the way it is. Full disclosure, I can't really blame Trent for having his head turned, but it's especially sad when it's a local kid who was a fan.
You need to be ruthless to win at transfers - sign players going out of contract, exploit release fees, prey on vulnerable clubs, pull out the stops to sell those on our own books who are running their deals down. More churn is the way to go.
I don't like it any more than you do.
I don't think anyone's blaming Real Madrid. Nobody has any expectations of REAL MADRID, of all clubs. The issue is whether it's decent of Trent to have followed the money to the exclusion of every finer consideration.