[quote author=Brendan link=topic=40212.msg1106424#msg1106424 date=1274256350]
Bren, if we tallied up the amount of times you've been wrong on this and other sites over the years, we'd be on an equal footing. And you know it.
The difference is that I don't feel the need to highlight this to you in the same rather pathetic, tryhard way that you're currently attempting. Probably because I don't have an inferiority complex.
'I don't care much for tactics, or such-like, I just like watching football...' You simple clown.
Can you name any obvious instances where I have made myself look like a gigantic, clueless, laughable cunt?
[/quote]
What will it achieve, more 'adjective adjective noun' STINGERS, like the "puddle-drinking" effort below?
I'm really not interested in dragging it out Bren, primarily because I don't have a complex over my fucking limited knowledge of what happens on a football pitch.
BUT... Since you asked:
Every. Single. Match. Thread. from the last 2 years. "Oh, but it's reverse negativiWAH WAH WAH". Seriously, they're fucking mortifying. "Look at this clueless cunt, he couldn't score in a brothel". As sure as night follows day, said "clueless cunt" scores the winner.
Players you continually championed that turned out to be fucking rubbish: Kewell, Baros, Ziege, Dudek, etc etc.
And conversely, those you ridiculed that then turned out to be fucking good regulars, and you backflipped like a fucking lamb on - Skrtel, Aurelio, Park, Kuyt, etc
Not to mention some memorably fucking awful comments:
"Danny Guthrie is 10 times the player Lucas will ever be."
"Robbie Savage is better than Momo Sissoko"
"I don't care much for tactics, just football on a pitch is enough" or some such bollocks.
And then there was your infamous "Benitez's tactics require 19 players" thread. Which I go back to occassionally when I'm need of a cheer.
I've had enough Bren. I could go on for days, but what's the point?