He'll do okay, but we will be wanting better. I predicted about 7 goals for him this season. He's obviously an upgrade on Borini, but that's not saying much. Encouraging signs against Norwich, but I'm not spunking my load after one half of footy.
He fit our play much better than Benteke but everyone know who will start. As long as Benteke and Sturridge is fit then they will start no matter how good Ings play. It must be frustrating knowing that.
If Lallana stays fit he and Ings would be the first 2 names on my team sheet every week. They are both talented footballers but, as important, they both "give a fuck".
Aldo:
The biggest plus was the performance of Danny Ings.
Liverpool’s goalscorer played like a 1980s throwback, running, chasing, harrying and closing down Norwich defenders throughout. He reminded me of Rushie and myself in the 1980s, refusing to give defenders a minute’s peace.
He showed a wonderful attitude which was both refreshing and infectious. He came on at half-time and brought the crowd to life and lifted the players around him, too. And he’s got quality too. His movement was excellent, he took his goal very well and did everything that could have been asked of him.
I think he's good for back up. What you don't want as 3rd/4th choice is someone who is sulking about not playing. He's got the perfect attitude.
Yep, he's a life wire off the bench.
Yeah that's fair enough.
It's just ideal that's all, you want someone who's hungry to succeed and who can provide that spark through sheer enthusiasm, not that he doesn't have quality, but you get the drift. If you look at players like Kuyt or Naysmith for Everton, he's got that same sort of attitude.
The issue I have/had with him was players of his standing and quality being brought in to try and improve the first team. And if they weren't brought in to improve the first team, rather to bulk out the squad, then why not concentrate on improving the first team first? Why spend so much time and money fleshing out the squad when the first team needs quality?
They were my issues, but it's a moot point really as I don't think we've done either of those things so I'm rambling here.
We have improved the first team (though you'd never know it with the way we're playing) and as long as players like Ings are kept out of the team by better players and we don't have to rely on them then I'll be content. If he's happy to be our Naismith/Kuyt kinda player then I'm all for it. But I'm also for genuine quality in the first team - something we don't have enough of.
Did we not try to do that though? We spent £60m on Benteke and Firmino, argue what you want about whether they've made an instant impact, but Ings looks a decent deal for back up. At the weekend Sturridge was just returning from injury while Benteke went off injured. If we hadn't bought Ings, what would we have had? It worked.
He'll do okay, but we will be wanting better. I predicted about 7 goals for him this season. He's obviously an upgrade on Borini, but that's not saying much. Encouraging signs against Norwich, but I'm not spunking my load after one half of footy.