• You may have to login or register before you can post and view our exclusive members only forums.
    To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Clyne

Status
Not open for further replies.
This injury is exactly what I have been referring to over the past few weeks.

We are taking a massive risk this season by not signing anyone in hoping our injury prone players stay fit - Clyne, Keita, Ox, Lallana etc.
 
I guess that resigns Gomez to being rotated at RB rather than at CB this season. We look to be without our emerging back up LB too after that horror tackle from Sevilla.
 
First off, it's sad news for all parties involved, but if this forces us to go and buy a left back, I'm all for it.
Hoever can cover RB.
 
Also, this is a case of when playing hardball backfires. I mean if Clyne was going to be sold.
 
Why do people even care.... a player that never plays for us get injured. Better him than Salah...
1. I have never ever seen you say that about Lallana.
2. This guy who supposedly never plays for us, used to play every game before his back injury.
 
1. I have never ever seen you say that about Lallana.
2. This guy who supposedly never plays for us, used to play every game before his back injury.

Well I never said anything about Lallana. I notice that Klopp fancy Lallana and that frustrate me a little as I don’t believe he will be able to play enough to get into the form he was a few years back.

But crying over Clyne, who Klopp tried to sell last year is waste of energy. He will not play 5 more Liverpool game in his career. So people start crying over lost money instead. That comes from fans who saw their club sign world record defender and goalie within 6 months. It is like saying "I have everything but it just isn't enough."
 
Klopp seemingly had no intention of relying on Clyne for anything this season. Was that going to change this season?

I guess it's a case of either using Gomez or giving Hoever (seems to have had a massive growth spurt since he got a first team shot last year).
 
Klopp seemingly had no intention of relying on Clyne for anything this season. Was that going to change this season?

I guess it's a case of either using Gomez or giving Hoever (seems to have had a massive growth spurt since he got a first team shot last year).
So why not sell him and let him break down at Crystal Palace or whatever. Fucking £10 mill looks great right about now.
It looks like we played hardball and it blew up in our face.
 
Well I never said anything about Lallana. I notice that Klopp fancy Lallana and that frustrate me a little as I don’t believe he will be able to play enough to get into the form he was a few years back.

But crying over Clyne, who Klopp tried to sell last year is waste of energy. He will not play 5 more Liverpool game in his career. So people start crying over lost money instead. That comes from fans who saw their club sign world record defender and goalie within 6 months. It is like saying "I have everything but it just isn't enough."
The money would have possibly helped us in signing someone else. Now, he's just another free transfer like Moreno, Can and Sturridge. Next year, Clyne and Lallana will leave for free as well. Let's say we sold Moreno, Sturridge, Clyne and Lallana last season. How much would we have gotten? At least £50 mill would be my estimate. Now we get zero and Klopp saying we cant afford any big money signing.
 
So why not sell him and let him break down at Crystal Palace or whatever. Fucking £10 mill looks great right about now.
It looks like we played hardball and it blew up in our face.

Were the balls made of trinitrotoluene? Who approved that kind of equipment?
 
The money would have possibly helped us in signing someone else. Now, he's just another free transfer like Moreno, Can and Sturridge. Next year, Clyne and Lallana will leave for free as well. Let's say we sold Moreno, Sturridge, Clyne and Lallana last season. How much would we have gotten? At least £50 mill would be my estimate. Now we get zero and Klopp saying we cant afford any big money signing.

Don’t let it keep you awake mate. We did the same with Matip, but forked out a zillion too much on Markovic. United fans would love to give away Sanchez for free but clubs cant afford the wages anyway. Klopp would never boast about what we can afford. We will save 200k a week when Clyne and Lallanas contract run out. The business part of footie is what it is. Robertson was not a big money signing like Moreno was he?
 
Don’t let it keep you awake mate. We did the same with Matip, but forked out a zillion too much on Markovic. United fans would love to give away Sanchez for free but clubs cant afford the wages anyway. Klopp would never boast about what we can afford. We will save 200k a week when Clyne and Lallanas contract run out. The business part of footie is what it is. Robertson was not a big money signing like Moreno was he?
Robbo and Shaq signings are very rare. Yeah I'm well aware of the fact that it will save us some money in wages later but still, selling them would have meant saving wages and getting a decent fee.
Oh well, nothing we can do about it now.
 
Robbo and Shaq signings are very rare. Yeah I'm well aware of the fact that it will save us some money in wages later but still, selling them would have meant saving wages and getting a decent fee.
Oh well, nothing we can do about it now.

They are rare. But even smerter then. But We have bought players for a fortune latent and even got decent return on others like Solanke. We are in a healthy finacial situation. And even better sport situation. Don't let Clyne spoil that moment....
 
So why not sell him and let him break down at Crystal Palace or whatever. Fucking £10 mill looks great right about now.
It looks like we played hardball and it blew up in our face.
Holding out for a higher price for Clyne is not what caused him to get injured. That was just misfortune. Of course £10m looks attractive in hindsight, but you don't have hindsight before the event, do you? Personally, I'd rather take the relatively insignificant hit on the Clyne trasfer and continue to build our reputation as a club that won't be taken for a ride, than move to a policy where we start valuing our utility players based on the small chance that they might get injured in the final year of their contracts.
 
Holding out for a higher price for Clyne is not what caused him to get injured. That was just misfortune. Of course £10m looks attractive in hindsight, but you don't have hindsight before the event, do you? Personally, I'd rather take the relatively insignificant hit on the Clyne trasfer and continue to build our reputation as a club that won't be taken for a ride, than move to a policy where we start valuing our utility players based on the small chance that they might get injured in the final year of their contracts.
Of course it wasn't but Clyne has had a few injuries the past two seasons, he was also in his last year. There must have been suitors before pre season started.
 
Look at it objectively. He’s had injuries in the last few years why would he have suitors? Bournemouth has a small amount of risk taking him for a few months.
 
67201422_10158115255727573_2905763452708454400_n.jpg
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom