• You may have to login or register before you can post and view our exclusive members only forums.
    To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Accommodating Gerrard – The conundrum facing Brendan Rogers

Status
Not open for further replies.

Jürgen4PM

Well-Known
Member
Accommodating Gerrard – The conundrum facing Brendan Rogers


He still has a lot to offer, but Steven

Gerrard is already widely regarded as one of the greatest Liverpool players of all time, the greatest, according to friend and team-mate Jamie Carragher. Supporters of Liverpool’s rivals will disagree I’m sure, but it’s arguably a sporting travesty that a player of Gerrard’s ability is yet to win the Premier League title.

At the age of 32, time is not on his side to put that right either, unless of course Anfield’s ‘Rodgers’ Revolution’ bares fruit far ahead of schedule. What intrigues me most about the new-look Liverpool is how the club captain will fit in – because being Steven Gerrard he surely HAS to fit in, right?
On the face of it, that’s a fair assumption, and not just because of his outstanding record of 149 goals in 585 club appearances – the current England captain was probably the nation’s best performer at UEFA Euro 2012.

Inspired rather than restricted by the responsibility of leading his country, Gerrard again showed a strength of character that he’s stamped on umpteen Liverpool matches over the last fourteen years.
Although slightly reined in this summer, it’s historically been an all-action style that’s won many fans and endless plaudits, but I just wonder whether it will need to be tempered, altered or even watered-down at a club that appears to be in the embryonic stages of a significant change in playing style?
Liverpool under Brendan Rodgers will be all about patience, passing and possession, most probably in a 4-3-3 formation – expect the emphasis to be less on setting a high tempo and more on ball retention, with ‘Hollywood’ passes discouraged.

So while the likes of Houllier and Benitez encouraged Gerrard’s dominating and marauding style, Rodgers is likely to prefer a calmer influence in the heart of his midfield, whose major responsibility will be to keep things ticking over.

That cries out the name Lucas to me and Rodgers has already been very complimentary about the fit-again Brazilian who has improved immeasurably in recent years and could prove fundamental to the way the new-look Liverpool will set-up and play.

One of many reasons I say that is the calm and efficient way the Brazilian goes about his business – he’s happy to be a cog in the wheel, relying more on brains than brawn to win the ball and then distribute it, usually passing no more than 10 yards.

While central-midfielders like Gerrard, and even Souness before him, excelled in the heat of an ‘engine room’, the midfield environment seemingly preferred by Brendan Rogers is a much calmer place with discipline and technique appreciated more than power and pace.
It’s all about the ball working harder than the players and less can indeed be more in those circumstances. Those in any doubt might want to ask themselves who looked more tired after 120 minutes in the Euro 2012 quarter-final between England and Italy…Pirlo or Gerrard?

In fairness to the England captain he’d exhumed much energy in previous games at the tournament attempting to lead and drive on a team that was often up against it, just as he’s done for much of his Liverpool career.

Gerrard is almost synonymous with the phrase ‘grabbing a game by the scruff of the neck’, but this presumed quality only leads to further question marks about how he’ll fit into a new-look Liverpool where the emphasis will be on the collective unit.

As brilliant and talismanic as Gerrard has been during much of his Liverpool career, there’s a controversial school of thought that, through no fault of his own, the captain’s dominant presence has not always helped the club’s attempts to build a league title winning squad – his performances often masking or excusing the deficiencies of some of those around him.

Dropping someone for being too good would of course be perceived by the Liverpool supporting public as ridiculous, and being a modern, media savvy manager, the whole PR aspect to this will not have been lost on Rodgers. Failing to accommodate a club legend, who’s still viewed as a prized asset by the club’s fans, would constitute a nightmarish start for someone trying to wins hearts and minds on Merseyside in their first truly ‘big’ job.

The challenge for Brendan Rodgers and indeed Gerrard himself is to find a way of adapting his game to a style and formation that he’s simply not used to at club level, whilst also acknowledging the limitations brought about by advancing years.

A huge plus in this respect is Gerrard’s versatility, as demonstrated by some of the best form of his career playing wide on the right under Rafael Benitez, who also used him at right–back during extra-time in the 2005 Champions League Final. In fact, when asked recently in a short video on the club’s official website to state where he played, Gerrard replied; “about ten different positions”, finding the right one is likely to be among the toughest initial challenges Brendan Rogers will face as Liverpool manager.
 
Right, gonna come across as even more of a moaning bastard than usual, but can people start giving the source when posting articles? It's always useful to know but it's hardly ever done on here now, so to save having to ask each time.....
 
Right, gonna come across as even more of a moaning bastard than usual, but can people start giving the source when posting articles? It's always useful to know but it's hardly ever done on here now, so to save having to ask each time.....

THIS^^^^^
 
Right, gonna come across as even more of a moaning bastard than usual, but can people start giving the source when posting articles? It's always useful to know but it's hardly ever done on here now, so to save having to ask each time.....
Moaning bugger!

Source: Me
 
I think the answer is to put SG at the right of the front 3 in a 4-3-3.

SG can be kryptonite in the middle for his playing partners.
 
Those articles make me cringe and have done for years.

They always pay lip service to his 'talent' but basically waffle on as though he's some kind of shit for brains battering ram who is lost when he's not running around or kicking things. He's been playing quite a reserved and measured role for England over the last few years and still looks like the best player on the pitch most of the time.

I wouldn't mind so much if we were bursting at the seams with talent (as Real were when Raul was on the decline) but when the alternatives aren't fit to lace his boots it all becomes a bit embarrassing. "Accomodating Gerrard"... fucking hell.
 
There's two aspects that make the majority of these articles nothing more than an exercise of one dimensional footballing philosophy.

The first point has already been touched on by Keni - making out that Gerrard or players of his ilk (of which there have been precious few) have no idea how to really play the game; they just run around a lot and things somehow come off for them which makes them look better than they really are. Nonsense. They see what has to be done and, importantly, they're the only ones who can actually get it done. Imagine someone coming out and saying it's going to be hard to see how Arsenal can accomodate Viera; it's going to be hard to see how the mancs can accomodate Giggs. Rubbish. Gerrard will be in the team cause his ability on the ball, his vision, skill and power make him irresistable.

The second point is this concept that Rodgers team demands that our captain become "a cog in the wheel". How much would Barca have won over the past 6 years if they hadn't had Messi tearing up the opposition? A slightly different style but the concept is the same - the mancs relied on Ronaldo and then Rooney to rip things up. They don't play the same style as Barca but they do have a system right through the club; it's something most of us have recognized for over a decade. They can bring anyone of their players into the first team and they slot straight in - cause they play to a system. Each player takes his place and fills the role in the system.

In the Barca system they play to allow someone like Messi to hit 1,000 goals a season; the mancs played to allow Ronaldo and then Rooney to hit however many goals a season. If Barca didn't have Messi they'd be a strong European team who keep the ball a lot. With Messi they're seen as one of the top European teams of all times who keep the ball a lot.

If Liverpool play according to Rodgers intended system and his intended system is designed correctly then we'll see a style of play tailor made for someone like Gerrard; a style that doesn't require him to defend endless lost balls, bad first touches and missed passes. It'll be a style of play that provides opportunities for him to destroy the opposition. In the past he's often had to create and exploit the opportunity - in a team that constantly generates these opportunities he could well be rediscovered as one of our greatest ever players.


And Rodgers will never need to feel guilty about forcing the team to accomodate their captain.
 
I think the problem with Stevie Gerrard is his own perception of his role in the team. He sees himself winning the ball deep in front of the defence and bringing it forward to work his magic. When managers try to use him further forward, which is where he is actually most effective, he tends to ignore the plan and drop back. That's what happened in the Cup Final - Kenny's plan was clearly to have Gerrard playing behind Suarez, but that never happened - Gerrard played further back where he was really surplus to requirements, and Suarez was isolated up front.
 
He didn't really play on the right though. He drifted infield and we often had an empty space playing RM.

He is good on the RW (he's good anywhere) but it's better for him and the team if he can play in the middle.
 
Three man midfield is probably the way.
I dont mind the idea of him right in a three either to be honest. In particular given the options.

Lucas
Gerrard
Henderson/Allen/Adam

or

Gerrard-Suarez-Borini

This will change again if we sign some better players though.
 
Three man midfield is probably the way.
I dont mind the idea of him right in a three either to be honest. In particular given the options.

Lucas
Gerrard
Henderson/Allen/Adam

or

Gerrard-Suarez-Borini

This will change again if we sign some better players though.
dont think he has the skills (for lack of a better term) to play that high up to be honest, although i thought he looked his best last season on the right wing, it was only for half a game mind, eventually henderson came on and went there instead for some reason
 
dont think he has the skills (for lack of a better term) to play that high up to be honest, although i thought he looked his best last season on the right wing, it was only for half a game mind, eventually henderson came on and went there instead for some reason
Have you a point in there somewhere Lewy?
 
As many have said - I prefer it when he plays further forward. He won't like it but I'd have him to the right of an attacking three. Then again where the hell does that leave either Borini or Carroll?
 
I'm very confused with the way people are talking about our midfield. Apparantly we have three up front and four in midfield and four at the back. How the fuck?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom