As if. He won't agree and why should he? He won't move there until the Summer.Sell in January if he's not going to sign.
maybe henry’s two mates, smith and wesson, can convince himAs if. He won't agree and why should he? He won't move there until the Summer.
what was the spelling mistake? google didn’t help meJust to say, because it may not be obvious, that the delays in the process are all around the haggling with the agents. Once there's a breakthrough in those negotiations, the paperwork is typically done in a day or two. So the delay here is basically Hughes/Edwards and the agents, both negotiating hard. But if they agree a deal on New Year's Eve it can all be drafted and signed in a matter of hours if absolutely necessary (and this is typically how it happens, which is why there was a typo in the Suarez transfer agreement with Barca which leaked).
I don't see it like that at all.If a player like TAA - a ~100M asset - refuses to entertain contract negotiations at the 2 year / 18 month mark, the club should probably look to sell to ensure a fee is received.
It does feel a little on the incompetent side, yeah, that we've basically gone "oh, well, we've had other stuff to worry about and we have tried..".
Really? You can't remember that?what was the spelling mistake? google didn’t help me
same, 0/3 at this stage is very surprisingMore than anything, I don't really understand with why the VVD deal hasn't been done yet. As far as I'm concerned, we ask him what he wants and then we give it to him with a firm handshake.
I think him and Salah are boxed off.More than anything, I don't really understand with why the VVD deal hasn't been done yet. As far as I'm concerned, we ask him what he wants and then we give it to him with a firm handshake.
why not announce though?I think him and Salah are boxed off.
or sign and announcewhy not announce though?
They’re still sorting Trent out and hope for a triple announcement.why not announce though?
Also, Ian Graham, said the data nerds at Liverpool saw the return on investment in wages (for LFC proven players) is much higher than the return on investment in transfers. So paying Trent 2 years wages rather than sell him & raise £50-100M to reinvest in transfers may well make financial senseI don't see it like that at all.
If he has said that then more than likely the club have just continued their efforts to get him to re-sign, we've seen this before (Stevie for example) where the club hasn't given up.
Personally though I really don't give a shit. He was ace when he played as an attacking full back and put cross after cross on a plate but he hasn't been that for a couple of seasons and I don't see him ever being that again. This season? 11 PL starts, one assist and zero goals. Last season was his worst since 2017/18 (with fewer games played but even then he may not have reached the previous low even with the same games played) with 3 goals and 4 assists (and in the CL since 2017-18 to date, 58 games, he's got a grand total of 4 goals and 1 assist).
So has this new style/midfield venture proved successful in other ways? Well we'd need @King Binny to tell us if other contributions have made up for the loss in GA but his passing hasn't been all that and I doubt our new found defensive strength is down to him. Additionally Slot's style certainly isn't all in on permitting TAA to attempt long passes all over the field.
In other words will he be difficult to replace? I don't think so. If we are going to lose any senior player I'd choose TAA over any other. We may have to pay £40-50m for a high quality RB, who may actually strengthen our defence and enable Konate and the midfield a respite from covering for him, but that's easily within reach if we re-sign VvD and Mo.
See. He was waiting for Salah to sign a deal then bag more for himself. Like Salah did last time.
Since Torres, I see players as often long transactions. Never really been moved anyone who’s left since. Also in most cases wouldn’t begrudge a player wanting a change but Trent would be extremely annoying more than anyone else being a scouser and length of time he’s been there though.Am I the only one who is completely unmoved by this? Trent has won everything with Liverpool and if he wants to move on I wish him luck. I don't necessarily see it as incompetence from the club "allowing" him to run down his contract either. If Trent doesn't want to sign a reasonable offer then he doesn't want to sign.
It would be a sign of incompetence if the club was lowballing or somehow forgot to make an offer, but that feels unlikely.
Nonsense.I hope it's not true - no team in the world should have their RB be the highest earner at the club. It's just plain and simple wrong.
It’s more secure 20-25m a season to also secure value of current market value of 80-100m talent. We can always still sell him next season.Lose a 80-100m asset or pay him 100-120m to stay for the next 5 years.
Is he worth the package though?
Sell to who though? It will have to be to someone Trent wants to join and can afford him. There is little chance of Madrid paying 80-100m for a player who had rejected them a year or two prior.It’s more secure 20-25m a season to also secure value of current market value of 80-100m talent. We can always still sell him next season.