Right now in their career's you would...obviously overall Firmino the better player/had the better career but right now you'd have Ings over him.This forum just gets more ridiculous by the day.
I'm going to nip this in the bud here.Why is it ridiculous? Ings is a better striker, the stats back that up.
Isn't Jota?Woah. What?
Playing football the way we set up, you’re saying Ings is definitively a better option than Firmino?
Did you completely miss Dmishra's post (& stats) or you just want to ignore it since it doesn't suit your rhetoric?Ings over the last 2 seasons has hands down been the better striker, in just about every way.
Firmino is mostly a passenger these days and it's a sad sight seeing what's he's become, a shadow of the player we saw 2016-2019 looks lost...sharpness gone, pressing gone, lazy passing, weak as piss.
I'm going to nip this in the bud here.
It's almost become fashionable to shit on the likes of Firmino and Wijnaldum here of late. There's no denying that their ability has declined, but have a bit of perspective please.
You want to compare Firmino's stats with Ings? Last year, which btw was Firmino's worst season, he had 9 goals and 7 assists - 16 goal involvements. Ings? Exactly the same - 12 goals, 4 assists.
Over their career? Firmino blows Ings out of the water. 144 goals and 105 assists. 249 goal involvements. Ings has 106 goals and 29 assists - 135 goal involvements.
That's almost double his production. Oh and btw, Firmino isn't even a true striker. He's a false 9 playing behind the main goalscorers in Salah and Mane.
While we're at it, Salah, Firmino and Mane have a staggering 309 goals between them in the last 5 years. Firmino has 87 of them. Not just one of the greatest attacking trios in the last decade, but will also go down as one of Liverpool's most storied forward lines. To be counted in the same breath as Rush-Dalglish or Barnes-Beardsley-Aldo.
And we're comparing Firmino with Ings? Ings is the classic good mid-table striker. Like Kevin Phillips, Darren Bent, Yakubu etc. Good goalscorer, but doesn't have the technique, touch or spatial awareness to be a genuine world class player.
Firmino has certainly declined, but at his prime he was a solid tier above a player like Ings. Even today, I'd take Firmino in our system over Ings anyday. His touch, technique, spatial awareness is still significantly superior.
There's a reason Ings has played the best football in his career with Burnley, Southampton and Aston Villa while Firmino is a PL, CL and a World Club Cup winner.
I'm talking about the here and now not over their career/in their prime, I acknowledge Firmino has done more in his career..what part of that of you not understand?Did you completely miss Dmishra's post (& stats) or you just want to ignore it since it doesn't suit your rhetoric?
Ings over the last 2 seasons has hands down been the better striker, in just about every way.
Firmino is mostly a passenger these days and it's a sad sight seeing what's he's become, a shadow of the player we saw 2016-2019 looks lost...sharpness gone, pressing gone, lazy passing, weak as piss.
You can't really compare the two, as Bobby plays more as supporting/second striker/false number 9. And besides Klopp disagrees with you too on this, as does market value
Gravenberch...
Gerrard-esque
Err yes, here and now. So you are ignoring the stats then. From Dmishra's post : last season being Firmino's worst season (so it's eminently likely he won't repeat that), 9 goals and 7 assists - 16 goal involvements. Ings : exactly the same - 12 goals, 4 assists -16 goal involvements.I'm talking about the here and now not over their career/in their prime, I acknowledge Firmino has done more in his career..what part of that of you not understand?
I watch every Liverpool game, this guy has offered us next to nothing since we came back from Doha in later December 2019...his overall play is finished to the Firmino we saw on fire the 2 seasons before.
Lol at people not thinking Grealish won’t make a huge difference to City or thinking he needs to make a difference to their first 11. The point is they can to win everything because whether you have Grealish, Sterling or Mahrez in the team it’ll be enough for that position in any comp. He’s another amazing player to unlock teams for them.
Err yes, here and now. So you are ignoring the stats then. From Dmishra's post : last season being Firmino's worst season (so it's eminently likely he won't repeat that), 9 goals and 7 assists - 16 goal involvements. Ings : exactly the same - 12 goals, 4 assists -16 goal involvements.
Give yourself a biscuit for watching every game ... like 90% on here (myself included).
Grealish massively improves City. The amount is irrelevant as it doesn’t matter to them.If anyone wants to decipher this I’d be greatful?
Grealish massively improves City. The amount is irrelevant as it doesn’t matter to them.
PS - go Fuck yourself with the snide shite, you understood well enough.
Where are the rumours ?
Where are the rumours ?
You want to compare Firmino's stats with Ings? Last year, which btw was Firmino's worst season, he had 9 goals and 7 assists - 16 goal involvements. Ings? Exactly the same - 12 goals, 4 assists.
Over their career? Firmino blows Ings out of the water. 144 goals and 105 assists. 249 goal involvements. Ings has 106 goals and 29 assists - 135 goal involvements.
They both debuted the same year and they are both the same age, but Bobby is slightly younger.I haven't checked the facts or numbers, but I'm presuming Bobby has done this over a longer career?
I'm wondering what their respective per game or per minute stats look like?
I’m taking this to mean I should be refreshing tall Paul’s Twitter feed and expect to see who we are buying.We're making 2 big signings. Just you wait.
Improve? For sure. He'll get so many soft FKs for KDB to score.Grealish massively improves City. The amount is irrelevant as it doesn’t matter to them.