• You may have to login or register before you can post and view our exclusive members only forums.
    To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Transfer Rumours 21/22

Status
Not open for further replies.
Doesn't he want like half a million a week? Not happening. In the same bracket as Mbappe.

Not sure about that, but he's on something like 140k per week now. So it will have to be at least double that and maybe more.
Raiola will be looking at 10-20 mill agent fee as well.
 
So this link to Danjuma. Is that some new Edwards incoming masterclass for a highly rated player that is currently in the Championship?
24 years old, 17 goals and 7 assists last season, can play on both wings and has some great pressing stats.

Cant say I've seen him once in all honesty. Anyone?

 
This Grealish transfer business is absolutely insane. I mean, he's a good player, but £100 million? Is that figure entirely based on the English media's depiction of him as England's saviour during the Euros? Because it's certainly not based on anything he's done on a football pitch. As things stand, he's no better than what they've got already.

Grealish
[xtable=skin1|261x@]
{tbody}
{tr}
{th}
Year{/th}
{th}
Matches{/th}
{th=34x@}
Goals{/th}
{th=43x@}
Assists{/th}
{th=62x@}
Total{/th}
{/tr}
{tr}
{td}
2020-21{/td}
{td}
26{/td}
{td=34x@}
6{/td}
{td=43x@}
10{/td}
{td=62x@}
16{/td}
{/tr}
{tr}
{td}
2019-20{/td}
{td}
36{/td}
{td=34x@}
8{/td}
{td=43x@}
6{/td}
{td=62x@}
14{/td}
{/tr}
{/tbody}
[/xtable]
Mahrez
[xtable=skin1|260x@]
{tbody}
{tr}
{th}
Year{/th}
{th}
Matches{/th}
{th=34x@}
Goals{/th}
{th=43x@}
Assists{/th}
{th=61x@}
Total{/th}
{/tr}
{tr}
{td}
2020-21{/td}
{td}
27{/td}
{td=34x@}
9{/td}
{td=43x@}
6{/td}
{td=61x@}
15{/td}
{/tr}
{tr}
{td}
2019-20{/td}
{td}
33{/td}
{td=34x@}
11{/td}
{td=43x@}
9{/td}
{td=61x@}
20{/td}
{/tr}
{/tbody}
[/xtable]
Gundogan
[xtable=skin1]
{tbody}
{tr}
{th=56x@}
Year{/th}
{th=39x@}
Matches{/th}
{th=34x@}
Goals{/th}
{th=43x@}
Assists{/th}
{th}
Total{/th}
{/tr}
{tr}
{td=56x@}
2020-21{/td}
{td=39x@}
28{/td}
{td=34x@}
13{/td}
{td=43x@}
2{/td}
{td}
15{/td}
{/tr}
{tr}
{td=56x@}
2019-20{/td}
{td=39x@}
31{/td}
{td=34x@}
2{/td}
{td=43x@}
1{/td}
{td}
3{/td}
{/tr}
{/tbody}
[/xtable]
Foden
[xtable=skin1|262x@]
{tbody}
{tr}
{th}
Year{/th}
{th}
Matches{/th}
{th=34x@}
Goals{/th}
{th=43x@}
Assists{/th}
{th=63x@}
Total{/th}
{/tr}
{tr}
{td}
2020-21{/td}
{td}
28{/td}
{td=34x@}
9{/td}
{td=43x@}
5{/td}
{td=63x@}
14{/td}
{/tr}
{tr}
{td}
2019-20{/td}
{td}
23{/td}
{td=34x@}
5{/td}
{td=43x@}
2{/td}
{td=63x@}
7{/td}
{/tr}
{/tbody}
[/xtable]

This was exactly my point. He strengthens their squad. He doesn't strengthen their first 11. Seems like a weird way to spend 100m.
 
He is worth more than 100M, he has everything that the other creatives lack, he is that good. I would go as far as saying he is in the top 5 best players in the world.
 
He is worth more than 100M, he has everything that the other creatives lack, he is that good. I would go as far as saying he is in the top 5 best players in the world.
Almost sparked a fire spitting my tea out at the Tele.

You don't honestly believe that?
 
I don't know why we're not after aouar. 25m is the fee he's meant to be available for
 
Almost sparked a fire spitting my tea out at the Tele.

You don't honestly believe that?
I do, absolutely think he is that good and the main reason we lost 7-2 to Villa away. He is a generational talent. City have more than upgraded their team, they will have taken it to another fucking dimension.
 
There are two very good and highly compelling reasons for not rating Grealish:

  1. He has stupid hair
  2. DB rates him

Quod Erat Demonstrandum
 
Last edited:
I do, absolutely think he is that good and the main reason we lost 7-2 to Villa away. He is a generational talent. City have more than upgraded their team, they will have taken it to another fucking dimension.
But top 5 in the WORLD?

I'd have understood if you said the league.

Messi Ronaldo KDB Salah Neymar Mbappe Haaland Lewa Kane Virgil are the top 10 in the world.
 
Certain people on twitter are saying we are not after anybody until we sell Div and Shaq. a) There is no room for another non-homegrown player b) with new improved contracts given to players, there is very little in the kitty
 
Certain people on twitter are saying we are not after anybody until we sell Div and Shaq. a) There is no room for another non-homegrown player b) with new improved contracts given to players, there is very little in the kitty
It also makes sense. We do have a large squad as far as non-homegrown players are concerned after ally.
 
Certain people on twitter are saying we are not after anybody until we sell Div and Shaq. a) There is no room for another non-homegrown player b) with new improved contracts given to players, there is very little in the kitty

If there is no room for nonhomegrown players, why did we waste one spot by extending Adrian's contract. Surely, we could have found a third choice locally trained goalkeeper for free.
 
Danny Ings moving to villa


Villa are buying in every position we need to

Winger - bailey
Striker- Ings
Mid - buendia

If they buy a CB then fuck it, they're the dickheads I'd like to accuse us of being
 
If there is no room for nonhomegrown players, why did we waste one spot by extending Adrian's contract. Surely, we could have found a third choice locally trained goalkeeper for free.
I don't know, brain fart moment from Klopp and club is all I can say
 
Danny Ings moving to villa


Villa are buying in every position we need to

Winger - bailey
Striker- Ings
Mid - buendia

If they buy a CB then fuck it, they're the dickheads I'd like to accuse us of being

And sold our best player? 😉
 
20%, so 6 mill if the 30 mill fee is correct. He had 1 year left on his contract I think.
Sell-ons *usually* only apply to the profit over the original fee paid. I’d be surprised if that isn’t the case here, in which case we won’t get that much. Not impossible we’d have negotiated a sell-on on the total fee (it’s not a standardised mechanism, clubs can write it however they want), but I think we’d have heard more about it being a problem over the last week or so if we were going to get 20% of the total fee.
 
Sell-ons *usually* only apply to the profit over the original fee paid. I’d be surprised if that isn’t the case here, in which case we won’t get that much. Not impossible we’d have negotiated a sell-on on the total fee (it’s not a standardised mechanism, clubs can write it however they want), but I think we’d have heard more about it being a problem over the last week or so if we were going to get 20% of the total fee.
Why do you have to put a downer on things?
 
Sell-ons *usually* only apply to the profit over the original fee paid. I’d be surprised if that isn’t the case here, in which case we won’t get that much. Not impossible we’d have negotiated a sell-on on the total fee (it’s not a standardised mechanism, clubs can write it however they want), but I think we’d have heard more about it being a problem over the last week or so if we were going to get 20% of the total fee.

Yeah, posted the tweet from Pearce confirming 2 mill £ 🙂
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom