We only 4 with him being here the perma crock.I wouldn’t be selling him, it feels like we’re going to be needing about 4 new midfielders soon
We only 4 with him being here the perma crock.I wouldn’t be selling him, it feels like we’re going to be needing about 4 new midfielders soon
We only 4 with him being here the perma crock.
Hahahahahahahawe have a strong midfield on paper, which coincidentally is what many of them are made out of
we have a strong midfield on paper, which coincidentally is what many of them are made out of
Did you fold over laughing?That creased me up.
But they’re still a mache for anyone…we have a strong midfield on paper, which coincidentally is what many of them are made out of
Would that 20 million be added to the 42 million they owe us for Coutinho?
"Jesus Christ. How many times have we had this conversation on the forum? Barca do NOT. Repeat DO NOT owe us any more money for Philippe Fucking Coutinho. Educate yourself a bit and people won't think you're a reprobate. There are a number of sources on this forum which have gone to the trouble to explain all this.
But while the accounts show that the debt to Liverpool remains, the Reds have actually received the cash after selling the debt to a third party financial institution.
Both 737Max and Momo are correct.
Both 737Max and Momo are correct.
Liverpool accounts shows nothing remaining.
Barca accounts show liability
Liverpool sold the debt to a third party, received cash up front.
Barca pay the 3rd party instead.
You're welcome.Cheers for your input mate
Oh, I never realised thatBoth 737Max and Momo are correct.
Liverpool accounts shows nothing remaining.
Barca accounts show liability
Liverpool sold the debt to a third party, received cash up front.
Barca pay the 3rd party instead.
The fucking papers don't seem to have grasped it.. after 5 years or so.Oh, I never realised that
I don't read every single tread here nor do I read every comment on every tread hence why, at the time I did not now that the subject had been discussed before Re- Barca and the debtOh, I never realised that
I don't read every single tread here nor do I read every comment on every tread hence why, at the time I did not now that the subject had been discussed before Re- Barca and the debt
I was when I mentioned @737MaxI thought you were trying to be funny…and it was a little bit. Not much.
Go to page 157 and read how wound up he got even when I intimated that Barca was trying to stiff us by not playing Coutinho so they did not have to pay overall fee potentially reaching £142 million if add-ons and bonuses are achieved. He wemt into melt down.almost still ignoring the main point I was making about taking Coutinho back on loan and instead concentrating on the debt side of post hence why I posted what I did. That and not wanting @peekay to fall fowl of a @737Max tirade on the matter
Question for anyone out there... Barca have not been playing Coutinho to save pay the add-ons and bonuses.
So question number
1)How much should we have recieved for Coutinho if the freshhold had been reached for add on's and Bonuses
2) How much snow did we actually get ?
Because surely the finance company would not have paid us any of the add on's or bonuses until we earned that i..e. Barca was liable for it
Wasn’t your point about barca trying to “stiff us” despite them not being able to do so?Go to page 157 and read how wound up he got even when I intimated that Barca was trying to stiff us by not playing Coutinho so they did not have to pay overall fee potentially reaching £142 million if add-ons and bonuses are achieved. He wemt into melt down.almost still ignoring the main point I was making about taking Coutinho back on loan and instead concentrating on the debt side of post hence why I posted what I did. That and not wanting @peekay to fall fowl of a @737Max tirade on the matter
Your Post.... You just explain it with no fuss 😀
Not enough “snow” to build a midfielder from... by the looks of it, we haven’t got a “freshhold” on anything.