• You may have to login or register before you can post and view our exclusive members only forums.
    To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Transfer Rumours 21/22

Status
Not open for further replies.
Would that 20 million be added to the 42 million they owe us for Coutinho?

Take It up with @737Max as he is saying ...

"
Jesus Christ. How many times have we had this conversation on the forum? Barca do NOT. Repeat DO NOT owe us any more money for Philippe Fucking Coutinho. Educate yourself a bit and people won't think you're a reprobate. There are a number of sources on this forum which have gone to the trouble to explain all this.
"

@momeWASboss added...

But while the accounts show that the debt to Liverpool remains, the Reds have actually received the cash after selling the debt to a third party financial institution.
 
I don't read every single tread here nor do I read every comment on every tread hence why, at the time I did not now that the subject had been discussed before Re- Barca and the debt

I thought you were trying to be funny…and it was a little bit. Not much.
 
Go to page 157 and read how wound up he got even when I intimated that Barca was trying to stiff us by not playing Coutinho so they did not have to pay overall fee potentially reaching £142 million if add-ons and bonuses are achieved. He wemt into melt down.almost still ignoring the main point I was making about taking Coutinho back on loan and instead concentrating on the debt side of post hence why I posted what I did. That and not wanting @peekay to fall fowl of a @737Max tirade on the matter

Your Post.... You just explain it with no fuss 😀
 
Question for anyone out there... Barca have not been playing Coutinho to save pay the add-ons and bonuses.

So question number
1)How much should we have recieved for Coutinho if the freshold
threshold had been reached for add on's and Bonuses

2) How much snow did we actually get ?

Because surely the finance company would not have paid us any of the add on's or bonuses until we earned that i..e. Barca was liable for it
 
Last edited:
Question for anyone out there... Barca have not been playing Coutinho to save pay the add-ons and bonuses.

So question number
1)How much should we have recieved for Coutinho if the freshhold had been reached for add on's and Bonuses

2) How much snow did we actually get ?

Because surely the finance company would not have paid us any of the add on's or bonuses until we earned that i..e. Barca was liable for it


Not enough “snow” to build a midfielder from... by the looks of it, we haven’t got a “freshhold” on anything.
 
Anyway... since we’re on a trip down discussion memory lane... is Simao still stuck on that runway, should we out an offer in for Owen and is anyone living in Zidane’s house yet?
 
Go to page 157 and read how wound up he got even when I intimated that Barca was trying to stiff us by not playing Coutinho so they did not have to pay overall fee potentially reaching £142 million if add-ons and bonuses are achieved. He wemt into melt down.almost still ignoring the main point I was making about taking Coutinho back on loan and instead concentrating on the debt side of post hence why I posted what I did. That and not wanting @peekay to fall fowl of a @737Max tirade on the matter

Your Post.... You just explain it with no fuss 😀
Wasn’t your point about barca trying to “stiff us” despite them not being able to do so?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom