What about the +£2? (I was going to say £1 but that didn't work)If he's refusing to sign another contract now, & his release clause is due up next summer, then we should offer 40m now.
The prices are insane this summer, if that clause wasn't there then we'd have to pay way way over that amount.
Who says we haven't.Why don't we just bid for him? what is there to lose by offering the 35/40m and seeing what they say?
We tried with Sanchez so that proves we at least had some interest in an elite attacking player.
Who says we haven't.
Everyone's a know all in transfer Windows....
We should offer £45million and a free go on Cilla Black
Total speculation by The Metro about this article in Bild.
http://sportbild.bild.de/bundesliga...-wird-er-zum-schnaeppchen-37128686.sport.html
Bild does not mention us at all.
You have just to love these release clauses, eh? So who let on that it actually does exists at the moment and not next season (never mind its value)?
IMO that underrates the attraction of coming to a team which plays as we're playing under Brendan, has just got back in the CL and is looking to re-establish one of the most illustrious dynasties in the history of football. It isn't so hard to imagine that top players could be attracted by such a prospect. Suarez was.
Quite. Money, reputation and where the Mrs wants to live, appaz, if Suarez and Sanchez are anything to go off.
To be honest, the exciting project line is probably doesn't convince you much when you're playing for Dortmund under Klopp anyway.
Maybe, maybe not. He's an excellent manager and they're doing well, but I wonder if even he thinks they have the potential we've got.
We don't do silly wages anymore
Dortmund have recently won the league and appeared in a CL final.
They look unlikely to enjoy similar levels of success in the near future but I think it's fair to say that someone like Reus wouldn't look at Liverpool and be wowed by the possibilities. We're a risk when you consider where we've been for the last few years.