I don't get what's so bad about us saying we won't sell a player and then selling him.
Isn't that what pretty much every transfer starts with?
Isn't that what pretty much every transfer starts with?
Chelsea ready to show their cards apparently. Won't bid more than 40m. According to the knobs at Sky
If they won't pay more than 40m than they can fuck off.Chelsea ready to show their cards apparently. Won't bid more than 40m. According to the knobs at Sky
Who gives a shit? The club still have to accept an offer, so if they don't bid more than city they can fuck right off.Yeah I can see him opting for Chelsea (if they do get involved) even if City bid more.
So people would rather we didn't sell him because they think we'd look strong? This is playground shit - this is exactly the attitude we should be looking to exploit in others.
We'd be absolutely fucking insane to turn down 50m in these circumstances. We would be stupid to turn it down. And then next season every time he has a poor game (and they're will be plenty) we'll be reminded that we could have gotten 50m for him.
Did you see Madrid selling Di Maria for 60m? How do they look after that deal?
We're selling him on our terms, the last thing we look is weak. We look like we've accepted the situation is as it is and we need to do the best we can out of it.
You cannot force a player to sign a contract, we were negotiatng for ages. So this nonsense about us not acting doesn't stand up.
If they won't pay more than 40m than they can fuck off.
I hope they send this return fax:
"Fuck. Off. Chelsea. FC..."
This:
"I think if you go down and ask 10 people what they think about him, I think nine would give you a positive answer," Vieira added. "I would be part of the nine people because he's shown how good he is, how well he's been doing at Liverpool.
"If he is in the market, not just City would be interested in him. But that's the first team and I'm not part of the first team, I work with the Academy. So I'm just giving you my opinion."
But Madrid could afford to lose Di Maria. They have half a dozen other better players.
We don't. We have no better players than Sterling.
The market is clearly inflated - 42M for David Luiz tells you that - so there will be 50M bids for this guy. 40M for Suarez the year before we sold him for 75M was insane at the time, but we held on.
We know this guys is quality, and we know he fits into our side. Two 25M replacements - cos that's what we'll buy, don't think for a fucking second we'll go and spend 50M on a replacement for him - will be just gambles, and who fucking knows what we'll get in return - especially with this manager/committee's track record.
If you've got a wonderful talent, and you don't have many others, and you don't have to sell, and you have fucking aspirations of winning things then we don't sell him.
We finished 6th, and we're about to sell our best player. 50M in return will not get us higher up the ladder.
We kinda do have to sell him though. Keeping him another season costs us about £25m. That's a disaster for us.
I don't know why some people seem to think we're in a strong position on this one. We're not at all.
Not that it changes the situation much, but Coutinho and Sturridge are both better players than Sterling, can people stop calling him our best player, he isn't.
No we wouldn't, but that's because as you say, Sterling has a higher ceiling, oh and he's also English.Well Sturridge doesn't play so I don't count him, and IMO Sterling's a better player and long term prospect than Coutinho.
It's line-ball really, but just my opinion I guess. If Coutinho was for sale today, we wouldn't be getting 50M for him.
He's not going to sign though. Whatever the offer. He wants out so it's a pointless argument. And he's really not that brilliant.Didn't we have the same situation with Suarez? And didn't we get him to sign a new contract?
Decent operators would be able to make this work. Give the cunt the 150K a week he wants, let him have the season of his life, then fuck him off for 80M the year after.
Coutinho is a better player than Sterling for me.
Better passer, better finisher, better with the ball at his feet.
Sterling is more adaptable and probably more explosive but id take Coutinho all day long.