I'm guessing Rodgers wants to add to the squad aswell. So if we sell 4 players he'll bring in more than 4 to get the depth he needs.
With 20ish mill + sales we need to be creative and clever. We need quality.
Yeah, I think McLaughlin will be promoted.
Hopefully, it will negate the need for us to buy and he can be a longterm successor to Johnson, I don't think I've personally been more excited about a young player in a long, long time, and that's mostly because he looks like Vegard Heggem!
Let's hope those 'add-ons' weren't that we win the League Cup in their first season 😉
??? Torres for 50m is way worseNothing will ever stop me being pissed off about spending £35m on Carroll. It's probably the single worst and most avoidable transfer mistake by any team in the whole PL era. Rafa got a good fee for Alonso but that doesn't mean he shouldn't get slated for spending £17m on Aquilani.
No,that price made sense,only hindsight made it worse.??? Torres for 50m is way worse
??? Torres for 50m is way worse
He does, and looks so experienced and calm for his age. I'm thinking a combo of Rob Jones and Heggem 🙂
Shame Robinson is struggeling, that would have saved us buying a left back. Hopefully Wisdom/Kelly can step up and replace Coates as the 4th CB.
Combo of Rob Jones and Heggem.... he'd be some fucking player no doubt.... during his month long playing career.
No,that price made sense,only hindsight made it worse.
Carroll had 6 months if good performances in the top flight.
We got bummed
But it was understandable. He was widely regarded as one of the best strikers in the world at the time. Carroll had looked good for half a season.
At his best he was ripping teams apart. Sadly we only saw him truly like that in a handful of games notably the FA Cup final. But you can't have it both ways you either judge the bumming size of a transfer at time of sale or after you've seen how it pans out. In the former I think it was a close call as Rooneys transfer showed you have to pay big for British talent and the latter isn't even a debate, at least Carroll showed signs of improvement when backed, Torres gets worse and worse even with Rafa thereRooney was 16 and scoring. Big difference. Carroll was 21 and scoring.
If Carroll scored 25 a season for us then of course it wouldn't have been an awful transfer. Same if torres scored 25 a season for chelsea.
And torres showed a lot more in 2 years with us (as well as at his time with athletico) than Carroll ever showed. His poor 6 months with us could be down to attitude, like it arguably is now.
Pat, out the 2 Carroll was the worse because at his best he was a 15m player, torres at his best was a 50m player.
So we should pay 50m to get Torres back then as at his best he is worth that?Also, if rooney was shit for united then yes, United would have been suckers. But he hasn't. He's excelled for them and repaid that figure.
Carroll and torres haven't come close to justifying their figures, but at least torres was worth 50m at his best.
Torres was never the same player after the WC and has been nothing short of shite for Chelsea.14m for an average winger from juventus. Awful deal? At the time questions would have been raised sure, but he went on to be one of the most prolific cunty chops ever did Henry.
Transfers can only be judged when their career is finished with that club combined with the knowledge of how they performed at the previous club.
Torres= great form for liverpool, Spain & athletico for 6 years. Awful for chelsea now (but still scored in a champions league semi away to barca)= awful
Carroll= great form for Newcastle for 6 months. Pretty awful for us. Awful for west ham on loan= awful