Imagine if your friend just got a new job, had a big presentation coming up, and bought a new suit. It looks pretty smart, nothing special, and it's tailored, but you think, hey, that was smart. Everyone should have at least one tailored suit, it's an expense, but he's investing in himself.
Then he tells you it cost 20,000.
GO FOR IT! You exclaim. I respect your intent and desire!
Meanwhile, elsewhere in this thread, Nunez, with 42 appearances (more than I think Klopp wanted to use him his first year) is listed summarily in the context of failure as "dropped."
But we went for it with him? Did we not go for it enough? Should we have spent 20 million more so that he would be better?
I am not a fan of paying 100 million plus for Rice or 65 million for Havertz. But they seem to have a plan and are backing their manager and showing the intent to compete.
I am betting if they have a central defensive crisis through this season, they wont wait till Jan 31 to bring in two players on loan.
Ever since we won the league, nothing about FSG suggests an intent to compete. I have not advocated for spending large sums of money. I questioned whether it was worth spending all this time and money chasing after Bellingham. I have questioned the Thiago transfer as it was a departure from the profile of players we used to sign.
I want us to get back to the street smart Liverpool at the beginning of Klopp's tenure where we had a fairly decent success rate of signing players whose value literally doubled or tripled within a season of arriving at LFC. There seemed to be a plan, a strategy behind every signing.