I don't see why it should. Everyone knows it's the English premium.
Arsenal now out of the race for any other midfielders. City are City nothing changing there. West Ham aren't shopping in the same market.
Non LFC summer transfer thread
- Thread starter LeTallecWiz
- Start date
- Latest activity Latest activity:
- Status
Arsenal now out of the race for any other midfielders. City are City nothing changing there. West Ham aren't shopping in the same market.
He’s about the same as Partey for me. Very good player but with an insane English tax.
If we were paying that for him the forum would go into a meltdown. But since its an other club thats doing the business its obviously excellent.
Partey is staying as well, so they have indeed improved their midfield. They’re still Arsenal though.
Would I be happy if we paid 105 on Rice? no, fuck no ... but if winning the league meant breaking the CB & GK transfer records, then fuck yeah - do it.
As I said, the transfer will depend on Arsenal's success as they're trying to make their move ... and that I respect, as you want your team to go for it ...
Imagine if your friend just got a new job, had a big presentation coming up, and bought a new suit. It looks pretty smart, nothing special, and it's tailored, but you think, hey, that was smart. Everyone should have at least one tailored suit, it's an expense, but he's investing in himself.
Then he tells you it cost 20,000.
GO FOR IT! You exclaim. I respect your intent and desire!
Meanwhile, elsewhere in this thread, Nunez, with 42 appearances (more than I think Klopp wanted to use him his first year) is listed summarily in the context of failure as "dropped."
But we went for it with him? Did we not go for it enough? Should we have spent 20 million more so that he would be better?
Then he tells you it cost 20,000.
GO FOR IT! You exclaim. I respect your intent and desire!
Meanwhile, elsewhere in this thread, Nunez, with 42 appearances (more than I think Klopp wanted to use him his first year) is listed summarily in the context of failure as "dropped."
But we went for it with him? Did we not go for it enough? Should we have spent 20 million more so that he would be better?
I think people think buying Nunez was more buying a purple zoot suit for a job interview, rather than the standard
Clearly 100M for Rice is madness. But, he'll be a great player at a top club, he's miles better than Partey for a kick-off.
Timber, Havertz and Rice are good additions to their team, and they may not be finished. I was dubious they'd be top 4 again next season but might have to revise that thinking.
Timber, Havertz and Rice are good additions to their team, and they may not be finished. I was dubious they'd be top 4 again next season but might have to revise that thinking.
Havertz i've not been sold by in England, so it'll be interesting to see if they can coax the talent back out, and where he even fits in their team. Rice and Timber would be great signings for them annoyingly. Still fell they need another winger as backup for martinellis inevitable injury, or a striker for Jesus' inconsistent finishing ability. I think they've done enough thought to be a strong candidate for top 4
Don't know if it's been mentioned, but the De Gea situation is fucking comical.
"David de Gea signed a contract extension with Manchester United, only for the club to back out of the agreed proposal.
De Gea, 32, agreed to a drastic reduction on his current £375,000 per week wages, but the club did not sign the contract and have now submitted a new proposal to De Gea, whose contract expires on June 30, with an even lower salary."
"David de Gea signed a contract extension with Manchester United, only for the club to back out of the agreed proposal.
De Gea, 32, agreed to a drastic reduction on his current £375,000 per week wages, but the club did not sign the contract and have now submitted a new proposal to De Gea, whose contract expires on June 30, with an even lower salary."
Surprised Man U are treating a player like that so badly.
Havertz is shit and were are they gonna play him? Pretty expensive back up for a player that doesnt score goals.
Its Danny Welbeck mk II when they signed him from Utd.
Rice is a very good player and will improve their team. But 100 mill is insane and I dont think he's that much better than Partey either.
But Partey is 30, 2 years left on his deal and injury prone.
Its Danny Welbeck mk II when they signed him from Utd.
Rice is a very good player and will improve their team. But 100 mill is insane and I dont think he's that much better than Partey either.
But Partey is 30, 2 years left on his deal and injury prone.
He's not someone i'd rely on in a run in. Mentality doesn't seem right either
Yeah, thats a good point. He’s pretty injury prone. I wouldnt have wanted us to sign him.
I have an irrational dislike of Maddison. He has a face which screams "Will play for United" someday. Dont ask me to explain it.
Perfect for Spurs then - they don’t do run ins.
Your lack of respect for the glorious Juande Ramos era where they shat trophies is disturbing !!!!!
He's a purple trackie, and this is Liverpool.
Apperently he used to walk around Norwich telling students his shoes cost more than their house. It's perfectly rational to hate the prick.
you know what it might be, he looks like a softer featured, less inbred Rooney
Wtf. So easy for people to hate on others because of something they did once upon a time half a century ago when they were a teenager.
Imagine if I judged you now based on how you lived life as a kid. Heck imagine if we all did that, society would be more fucked than it is today.
Imagine if I judged you now based on how you lived life as a kid. Heck imagine if we all did that, society would be more fucked than it is today.
Smokescreen
weird uncle Maddison it is
- Status
