LVG's Man Utd

[Arn]

That's assuming they are official scarves

You are not allowed to sell scarves with a trademarked picture on it.

A release of any kind is only required if the photo makes it appear that the subject of the photo advocates a particular point of view (supporting a product, idea, ideology, relgious or political position). Simply put, you can't publish an image in a way that makes a person appear that they support something without their permission. If the photo would imply that association, then the entity that publishes the photo—which usually isn't the photographer—is responsible for getting permission from that person.

 

[Woland]

If you fancy a good laugh now, go on redcafe. They're all shitting themselves that he's staying.

 

[gene hughes]

 

[gene hughes]

 

[Frogfish]

He has won a title at every single managerial stint he's had though. And they can happily go and spend another 200 million in the next transfer window they want. Their squad isn't great, but it isn't terrible either - De Gea, Smalling and Scheiderlin have the makings of a decent spine, and they have some promising talent in Depay and Martial.

I think he'd challenge for the title within 18 months.

Hopefully De Gea has his reasonable buy-out clause (why else would he have re-signed when all he had to do was wait another season before moving to Real on a free) and will be gone in the Summer.
But they have some excellent players and a good manager and the money United can throw around will have them challenging for the title sooner rather than later. I've been predicting United's downfall since Ferguson left but they'll bounce back.

 

[Frogfish]

I mean I don't think that we're that classy ourselves anymore, but these guys and Chelsea make us look like Cary fucking Grant.

Eh ? Gay ?

 

[Frogfish]

You are not allowed to sell scarves with a trademarked picture on it.

A release of any kind is only required if the photo makes it appear that the subject of the photo advocates a particular point of view (supporting a product, idea, ideology, relgious or political position). Simply put, you can't publish an image in a way that makes a person appear that they support something without their permission. If the photo would imply that association, then the entity that publishes the photo—which usually isn't the photographer—is responsible for getting permission from that person.

HA HA HA - do you know nothing of back street knock-offs then ? Led a sheltered life perchance ?

 

[manwithnoname]

If they are selling Man U Mourinho scarves then the deal is done and dusted IMO. Image rights and all that.

Hahahaha! Fucking hell.

 

[Gerry_A_Trick]

Louis van Gaal says Manchester United fans left Old Trafford early to beat traffic

Under-fire manager refuses to accept turgid football was to blame for fans' early exits...