• You may have to login or register before you can post and view our exclusive members only forums.
    To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Konchesky

Status
Not open for further replies.

dee

Part of the Furniture
Administrator
Musing over the fact we can't sell him until Summer due to having played for two clubs this season already.

I wondered if we'd be allowed to return him to Fulham and claim a refund due to him being 'unfit for purpose'?
 
Apparently there's interest in him (apart from filling Budgie's seed tray with Trill) but we'll need a UEFA/FIFA directive an' shit.
 
Can we not just hack off one of his legs in an unfortunate "training" incident and claim the insurance.
 
If he is on ~£35k/week then we have a liability of £7.25m less what he's already been paid (~£800k).

I wish I'd been good at footy
 
[quote author=SaintGeorge67 link=topic=43735.msg1257937#msg1257937 date=1295536656]
Uefa won't agree it.

Our only arguments are that he's shit and his mum's a cock. I doubt that'll be enough.
[/quote]

....but, but she's a real bad cock!
 
We can't take him back because it doesn't state his purpose on the receipt. If it would have said he was meant to be a left back, statutory rights would have been invoked. As is he can make a nice cup of tea and they could argue that's why we wanted him.
 
[quote author=Dee link=topic=43735.msg1257908#msg1257908 date=1295534498]
If he is on ~£35k/week then we have a liability of £7.25m less what he's already been paid (~£800k).
[/quote]

Fuck me...here in SA i'd have been a millionare more than 8 times over if I had that amount of money.

[/quote]
I wish I'd been good at footy
[/quote]

Me too 🙁
 
Plenty of posters on this site were full of praise for him after some of his early performances for us.

S'true.
 
Is it? I remember posters saying "give him time" after his initial few poor games for us
 
He was never good for us and I can guarantee that I wasn't one of them.

He makes Insua look world class :-(
 
There were one or two games in which he didn't look as lost as he had in others. That's about the best one can say for the poor guy IMO.
 
PAUL KONCHESKY will be rescued from his Liverpool nightmare by ­returning to Fulham for a cut-price £1.5m in the summer.

Craven Cottage boss Mark Hughes wanted the full-back on loan now, but has struggled to tie up the switch.

Konchesky, 29, has been told to focus on getting through the season at Anfield, where he has failed to win over fans since Roy Hodgson signed him for £4m on a four-year deal in August.

Sparky expects defender Carlos Salcido to return to Mexico in June, then will go back in for Konchesky.
 
[quote author=Vanbasten84 link=topic=43735.msg1270323#msg1270323 date=1296468254]
3 Teams in a season?? is it ok cause its a loan deal?
[/quote]

I presume so.



London to Nottingham is much easier for dear Carol to arrange transportation to..
 
[quote author=Avvy link=topic=43735.msg1270326#msg1270326 date=1296468366]
3.5 million waste of space.
[/quote]

Of which we will probaby only see 1.5m back...
 
[quote author=RolandG link=topic=43735.msg1269075#msg1269075 date=1296374611]
Send him back to London. I'd take whatever they offer.

Swap with Dempsey?
[/quote]

I'd swap the useless twat for syphilis. Anything to never see him in Liverpool red again.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom