[quote author=Judge Jules link=topic=47437.msg1423975#msg1423975 date=1320868357]
I wouldn't. His defensive problems are often exaggerated, on here as well as in the media; he'd have to have spent a lot more time out with injury in his career to deserve being called "injury-prone"; 27 is no age whatsoever for a defender; and £8-10 mill.would be daylight robbery.
Apart from that, spot on.
[/quote]
Likewise, i reckon his attacking capabilities are often exaggerated. Yes, injury prone, he's missed a lot of games, then when he returns he usually takes weeks to return to any sort of form.
Not saying 27 is old for a footballer whatsoever, and i hate when people seem to think a player's career is over if they're not 25 or under, it's madness. However at 27, you'd usually have a clear idea of a player's abilities, it's not like he's a youngster and can iron out any defensive deficiencies in his game, he's an established International with 10 years experience of Premier League football under his belt.
£8-10 million would be a good deal for us, and would allow us to bring in a right back who can defend. There's a big question mark over Kelly's injury record and fitness as well which is obviously a worry.