I'm not entirely against him, but I can see the cons:
He's nearly 30.
His value is at it's absolute highest right now and regardless of whether he's good or bad, we'll never ever recoup that so it's dead money.
Why are none of Man City, Man Utd, Chelsea, etc in for him?
Couldn't we spend 10M on a 20 year old?
Who's he ever done well for, Fulham? Big fish, small pond.
I agree his value is at it's highest, but unfortunately that's the story of our incoming transfers for the past couple of years. He's only got a year left on his contract though, and his value is decreasing by the day, i'd hope 6-8m would be reasonable enough for both clubs. Fulham won't want him to walk away for free next summer when they could easily receive a decent fee now to reinvest, so it's up to Clint whether he really wants the move.
It is strange that other top Premier League clubs haven't been rumoured to be interested in him but they may have made enquires that we just don't know about, plus they have an abundance of midfield options we could only wish to have. Yeah, he's 29, though if we can get 2 or 3 quality seasons out of him like the way he's been performing at Fulham then i'll be happy enough, then hopefully by that stage Shelvey, Suso or whoever will be ready to claim a regular spot.
I think the last comment is a bit unfair as he can only give his best for the team he's playing for. He's done pretty well at his former club New England Revolution, helping them to two MLS Cup Finals in three years. With his national team also, scoring in successive World Cup finals, netting against Spain in the Confederations Cup to get to the Final whilst receiving the bronze ball in a tournament littered with star names, then retaining the Player of the Year trophy at Fulham this year. He can only do what's asked of him.
....and he's also broke the cheekbone of John Terry and Phil Jones what's not to like.