I'm sure they'll get over it.
Can we find the Lavia?
- Thread starter Squiggles
- Start date
- Latest activity Latest activity:
- Status
I'm sure they'll get over it.
They can have him honor his existing contract.
"Doak commits his future to LFC by signing a 5 year contract".
Great thanks.
With them, yes. But not force him to go to Liverpool.
He isn't 28, he is 17. So not sure why they would use the wordd "commits his future"?
Last edited:
Mhm...
We never officially walked away from the deal, did we, despite multiple reports claiming that our eleventeenth bid had been rejected.
Yeah so does he want to double his salary and play for Klopp, or stay at Brighton for one more year??
What a weird post.
This player has big potential and wants to come play for us , counts as home grown just pay the difference yesterday and get it done and get a defender also . Forget caicedo any player who fancies Chelsea especially this Chelsea who aren't in any European competition isn't worth the bother.
I’m guessing that with the need to cover Nkunku etc that they’re going for Lavia after all at these rates…or Boehly is even more of a raging narcissist than even I imagined.,.
At 17 a player who signs a 5 year contract isn't committing his future, that's all I am saying. He has made a long term commitment, but that's it.. That was my point
Do 17 year olds not have a future?
"Excellent news. Great window by LFC. Everything all good."
- Mystic when Chelsea unveil Caicedo and Lavia before the game on Sunday.
When it said "a player has committed his future to a club", it means his playing future. It was clearly a click bait from the author.
50m? Fuck if only some one had told our data scientists boffins, this has come completely from left field then.
We spent whole summer playing number wang, if this goes through then can’t wait for the recent FSG apologists on here to explain this one to me unless we never wanted him in the first place and we end up getting Caicedo.
We spent whole summer playing number wang, if this goes through then can’t wait for the recent FSG apologists on here to explain this one to me unless we never wanted him in the first place and we end up getting Caicedo.
Last edited:
We walked away. Awesome.
Looks like they purposely drop the Adams deal to make sure they get this Lavia one over the line. Acting like a bully - though that's kinda expected. I wouldn't want us to suffer further humiliation by matching their bid for Lavia only to get rejected by the player. 😳
I think Lavia would still choose LFC, he's sold on our project just like Caicedo apparently is sold on Chelsea's. So in the end they may get offers accepted for both, but so will we and it will be up to player preference. They will get Caicedo and we will get Lavia.
If this is true, they can't match our bid for Caicedo, so want to use this Lavia bid to force our hands
£55m
Last edited:
- Status
