Big D vs Twitter

[StevieM]

I think you're mistaking evidence for proof again.

There wasn't enough evidence to bring charges against Trump.

I'm quite happy to say I know Trump is corrupt for other reasons. I never bought into the line that he was Putin's puppet which was the line pushed by the media - that you and all the other people who think they're clever fell for.

You won't even consider the evidence against Biden , because you're simply afraid it will lead you to the conclusion that your support for Biden was hilariously dumb. That both Hansern and our resident virus expert are liking your posts should tell you all you need to know - you're talking shit.

Get over yourself Ross - all you do is rack up assumption after assumption and try to present it as insight.

There isn’t evidence to suggest Biden did anything wrong - there’s evidence to suggest he has questions to answer - which may or may not lead to actual evidence.

I could not give two hoots if Biden’s found guilty of wrong doing and gets impeached - that’s democracy in action.

If he wants to deny it, avoid it, wilfully obstruct the truth, lie... whatever - then, that’s up to him and I’ll condemn it as wrong.

What I won’t do is happily pretend I’m interested in the truth when one of the biggest con men, bully, liar, thief, call it what you want, gets a pass to say and do what ever he wants and manipulates everything to suit his own needs with no interest in truth or fairness.

I’ll try to spell it out for you again, maybe I’m not being clear enough for you - all that shit dragged up about Biden was rolled out at a very specific time to cause maximum damage to Biden’s campaign and get Trump re-elected regardless of how truthful or not it was.

So no... I’m not a fan of Biden - I think he’s terrible, to be honest, but neither am I a fan of listening to your half baked, half arsed conspiracy theories in order to have Trump hurt my eardrums for another 4 years.

And if we’re doing the thing where you call out who’s liking who’s posts - apart from the amusing ones, which I’m happy to like because they’re amusing - pretty much the entire site reckons you’re an utter tit.

Not that I’m sure you care.

At least Dantes is entertaining.

 

[StevieM]

Well if it wasn't controversial she wouldn't need to attempt to hide her ownership via other companies.

But let's ignore that.

Well she clearly didn’t hide it very well if you figured it out from your laptop in Dublin.

 

[LeTallecWiz]

I'm gonna need a list of the globalists.
You mentioned Kier is one, cos he's been to the Bilderberg meetings.
Murdoch?
Owners of CNN etc?
Johnson isn't cos Brexit goes against the globalist agenda.. and for clarity what is the agenda?

Are there any African globalists?

 

[tomasjj]

So, if this is rigged, how come they didn't take the Senate?

 

[Woland]

These Reddit incels seem to believe they live in America. Really interesting to watch them fall apart.

 

[dantes]

So, if this is rigged, how come they didn't take the Senate?

Probably because it wasn't rigged by the senators. This will come as a shock to you, but Biden doesn't need the senate if he has no intention of doing any of the stuff he claimed was in the interests of the people. He only needs the White House and then the monies will start flowing. Indeed whilst he is busy getting rich he can blame the senate for why he hasn't done any work.

Also if he rigged the senate, it would piss off the incumbents in those states who would then support the fraud narrative instead of asking Big D to pack his bags like the disloyal lizards they are.

 

[Atlas]

Are there any African globalists?

No. Only white people from Europe and America and globalists.
And probably some Jews or something.

I should also prob add that 95% of em are white blokes.
They are the patriarchy.

 

[LeTallecWiz]

No. Only white people from Europe and America and globalists.
And probably some Jews or something.

I should also prob add that 95% of em are white blokes.
They are the patriarchy.

Soros for sure has to be one.
Adelson.
Those bankers.
Can we include the Glazers because they own evil stuff in England (not so much in Amerika)

 

[StevieM]

Democrats: drops egg from window
Fake news: looks away
Trump: the egg is smashed you fools, we need a new egg
Fake news: Trump is claiming without evidence that the egg is smashed, there is no evidence of a smashed egg
Trump: asks court to look at the ground
Socialists: disgraceful president, sore loser, look at how McCain conceded, racist racist racist
Dantes: but gravity, 10m/s2, g, do the math, it smashed...
StevieM: you just made gravity up
Dantes:

You see this is where you going wrong.

The democrats didn’t drop an egg.... it was something else that looked like a egg, but wasn’t actually an egg.

Trump needs it to be an egg - so he’s wrongly telling everyone he knows it’s definitely an egg - but people are generally sick of him chatting shit, no one cares what he says anymore.

Even the courts keep telling Trump to fuck off with his eggsaggerations (see what I did there).

Then Dantes comes along to talk about gravity while everyone wonders what drugs he’s on and I make a reference to Star Wars in some way.

Meanwhile, Ross has a photo of Nancy Pelosi eating scrambled eggs and believes this is evidence that there was an egg and she’s behind it all.

Make sense.... oh yeah...

These aren’t the eggs you’re looking for...

 

[Woland]

 

[Mamma Mia]

Seeing Woland justify why Joe Biden is the best choice for leader of the free world makes me think the Revolution of Lowered Expectations has reached it's zenith.

 

[Rosco]

Assuming that's true... what about in the here and now. Trump vs Biden.

Who should get the win?

I wouldn't have voted for either as I pointed out earlier in the thread.

 

[Gerry_A_Trick]

The vast majority of votes that gave creepy joe the win came by post. There will be some real number of those that are fraudulent or illegal due to a technical error, and should not count. If you think the number is 0% you're an idiot. If you think it's 100%, you're probably a bigger idiot. Let's say it's 1%.

In an ideal world, you'd pick that 1% out and reject it. This is impossible to do. The best you can do is use your eye/algorithm to get as many as possible. The infuckingevitable consequence of that is you will 1. reject valid votes, 2. accept valid votes, 3. reject illegal votes, 4. accept illegal votes. It's just how statistical solutions work. So when you write up the code / pelosi machine to do this work, in an ideal world you will hit 1% by rejecting and accepting votes as per 1-4 above such that the total comes to 1%.

Now, if you change one parameter in that code on a whim, you'll reject 5%, change another and you reject 0.1% net. It's fucking arbitrary. So your election result is going to be arbitrary. That is a fraud against the people. If you don't like the word fraud, then call it statistically unrepresentative. It doesn't matter. The only way to prevent that fraud is not use mail in ballots in the first place, or if you did, then you need to go to court, analyse all the data, and check whether the arbitrary parameter they used in the voting machine corresponds to an actual 1% rate you measure in a sample of ballots. Not one of the stupid sources and fact check websites has the intelligence to understand this, because it involves some maths I guess, I don't know.

This is my issue with mail in voting. Not some 4chan conspiracy moron that you take me for. Y'all must have forgot who I am.

In person voting had an element of debate on a number of votes cast, so you can use that argument to claim all elections are arbitrary.

 

[Woland]

Seeing Woland justify why Joe Biden is the best choice for leader of the free world makes me think the Revolution of Lowered Expectations has reached it's zenith.

Imagine it was Uncle Woy

 

[Rosco]

What do you mean by 'globalists'?
Bernie would never have been president - a Jew as a president? Come on ... better chance of Jews controlling the media ... fuck, wait a second!

The people who push the neo liberal agenda of free trade across the world at all costs.

If you look at it through the prism of Labour / Business / Government - you see the balance of power shifts dramatically when the neo liberal policies are pursued. Because Labour can move freely workers lose bargaining power, and business has infiltrated government to the extent that they now to business too.

Those began to take hold in the 1980's and they have increased inequality dramatically.

Some re-balance of the power is required and that's never going to happen while neo-liberal economic policies are pushed.

So anyone whose not going to do that is better than a neo-liberal. Crazily the Billionaire Trump , possibly accidentally, is more likely to halt the neo liberal agenda.

As for who the globalists are - have a look at the Bilderberg Attendees. That's where it starts.

 

[Rosco]

Are there any African globalists?

Yes.

Hence the African Union.

 

[LeTallecWiz]

The people who push the neo liberal agenda of free trade across the world at all costs.

If you look at it through the prism of Labour / Business / Government - you see the balance of power shifts dramatically when the neo liberal policies are pursued. Because Labour can move freely workers lose bargaining power, and business has infiltrated government to the extent that they now to business too.

Those began to take hold in the 1980's and they have increased inequality dramatically.

Some re-balance of the power is required and that's never going to happen while neo-liberal economic policies are pushed.

So anyone whose not going to do that is better than a neo-liberal. Crazily the Billionaire Trump , possibly accidentally, is more likely to halt the neo liberal agenda.

As for who the globalists are - have a look at the Bilderberg Attendees. That's where it starts.

So basically .. you want a world where we 'stick to ourselves' more and demand that relationships are more balanced, and that we create our own goods etc instead of moving them off (or buy them) at cheaper costs?

So a form of socialist capitalism?

 

[LeTallecWiz]

Yes.

Hence the African Union.

I don't see any African nations here:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Bilderberg_participants

 

[Athens]

I thought American woke liberals didn't use the C word.

 

[Rosco]

So basically .. you want a world where we 'stick to ourselves' more and demand that relationships are more balanced, and that we create our own goods etc instead of moving them off (or buy them) at cheaper costs?

So a form of socialist capitalism?

I don't know what the correct term to describe what my preference is. A balance of both sides.

A world where it's not possible for someone like Bezos to become insanely wealthy when at the same time he pays his staff so little they qualify for social supports.

 

[keniget]

I wouldn't have voted for either as I pointed out earlier in the thread.

Not asking who you'd vote for in an ideal world... but who, out of Biden vs Trump, would you rather see get the win given all the alleged shenanigans on either side.

 

[LeTallecWiz]

I don't know what the correct term to describe what my preference is. A balance of both sides.

A world where it's not possible for someone like Bezos to become insanely wealthy when at the same time he pays his staff so little they qualify for social supports.

I would hope most of us can work with that ... I know I do ... People should be able to get wealthy but we should also, as a society, take better care of our less privileged.

 

[Woland]

 

[Woland]

I would hope most of us can work with that ... I know I do ... People should be able to get wealthy but we should also, as a society, take better care of our less privileged.

He's hard for Trump, he just won't admit it

 

[Atlas]

Andrew Yang talks the clear sense here.

And is my concern with Biden/Harris. It'll be just an extension of the shit they been pulling before.
Those cities that might well pull Biden over the line are the cities he needs to turn back to if he wins and do some serious work to say thanks and build up the trust of those who didn't vote them.

Otherwise it's the same shit again and again. And I hope it's not akin to Boris standing outside his house clapping the nhs, offering them badges and Pride of Brit awards.. actual real tangible make their day to day life better

 

[rubans]

 

[Rosco]

Not asking who you'd vote for in an ideal world... but who, out of Biden vs Trump, would you rather see get the win given all the alleged shenanigans on either side.

Trump is less dangerous, but more nauseating.

 

[dantes]

I would hope most of us can work with that ... I know I do ... People should be able to get wealthy but we should also, as a society, take better care of our less privileged.

Unfortunately, the free world is celebrating the ousting of the one politician who could bring about something close to that world, because their poor feelings wah wah there there poor babies, their feeling were hurt by the mean orange man bully wah wah.

 

[dantes]

Trump is less dangerous, but more nauseating.

So your nausea is more important that people being able to feed their kids, I sometimes wonder if I'm actually the one who lacks empathy.

 

[dantes]

Andrew Yang talks the clear sense here.

And is my concern with Biden/Harris. It'll be just an extension of the shit they been pulling before.
Those cities that might well pull Biden over the line are the cities he needs to turn back to if he wins and do some serious work to say thanks and build up the trust of those who didn't vote them.

Otherwise it's the same shit again and again. And I hope it's not akin to Boris standing outside his house clapping the nhs, offering them badges and Pride of Brit awards.. actual real tangible make their day to day life better

Ahhahahahaaaahahaha unfortunately Mr Yang, it's too fucking late, all that's left to do now is to enjoy your bed you stupid retarded son of a bitch.