• You may have to login or register before you can post and view our exclusive members only forums.
    To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Big D vs Twitter

Only 463 votes separates them in Georgia now
Yeah I'm watching that tick over - delightful. It's going to give Trump an aneurysm.

Penn almost certain to go Dem too with the huge amount of ballots uncounted and when N.Carol starts up again that one will be another nail-biter.

Nevada is done (I took a look at which counties haven't yet reached a 100% count, and the party voting split so far, and my maths suggest a 20k+ win for the Dems there, although of course my methodology could be totally wrong)!

Arizona isn't done but Biden is stretching out his lead there (46k now).
 
Yeah I'm watching that tick over - delightful. It's going to give Trump an aneurysm.

Penn almost certain to go Dem too with the huge amount of ballots uncounted and when N.Carol starts up again that one will be another nail-biter.

Nevada is done (I took a look at which counties haven't yet reached a 100% count, and the party voting split so far, and my maths suggest a 20k+ win for the Dems there, although of course my methodology could be totally wrong)!

Arizona isn't done but Biden is stretching out his lead there (46k now).

Georgia seems to be key for any chance of change in the senate aswell.
 
Woah Putin says he's going to retire early next year!? After some health issues...

I'm sure completely unrelated to Trump losing this American election
 
Woah Putin says he's going to retire early next year!? After some health issues...

I'm sure completely unrelated to Trump losing this American election
They're going to retire and share a villa together on one of the Costas.

There's some reality TV show deal on the cards.
 
No verifiable proof was good enough when you were wanging on about Biden and China the other week.

What did Trumps team and the Russians discuss in their meetings - I’m sure the recording will clear it up.

Or are you back to arguing that only Democrats do naughty shit that they should be pulled up on.

And before your head disappears completely up your own arse - I would apply the same standards to both Trump, Biden, Pelosi, etc if they were applied equally , which they aren’t.

You know as well as I do - that not all ballots cast in absentia are fraudulent - the vast majority will be cast in good faith, Pelosi’s ownership of a company that develops software for vote counting machine, in itself, means nothing - it’s circumstantial, Trump has been building a narrative for ages to sow seeds of doubt, if he needed to, he’s not in it to Make America Great Again - he’s in it for whatever benefits him, personally, the most - like they probably all are.

Seriously - what happened to you?

I think you're mistaking evidence for proof again.

There wasn't enough evidence to bring charges against Trump.

I'm quite happy to say I know Trump is corrupt for other reasons. I never bought into the line that he was Putin's puppet which was the line pushed by the media - that you and all the other people who think they're clever fell for.

You won't even consider the evidence against Biden , because you're simply afraid it will lead you to the conclusion that your support for Biden was hilariously dumb. That both Hansern and our resident virus expert are liking your posts should tell you all you need to know - you're talking shit.
 
How about we start checking Florida properly?

Or we wait for the court case to proceed, and hope Big D's lawyers have enough sense to request disclosure of the statistical records, then you can check who voted, how old they were, what percentage were rejected in each county, and so forth. The way you'd expect an accountant to go through the bank statements in a financial fraud case. These are the facts that will emerge.

The irregularities with in person voting will be non-existent: which is the early data where Big D was way ahead.
The irregularities with mail in voting will not be non-existent: which is the laughable assertion by the fake news that they wish is so since that's where biden is ahead
The irregularities with mail in voting will not be bigly tremendous: which is the false but entertaining narrative Big D is going with

The only fact up for debate is are the irregularities enough to swing the election result? I would bet yes, almost certainly yes because of how skewed the mail in vote is for creepy joe and how tight the margin of his win is. I also don't think the lawyers will even consider analysing the data and checking them by taking randomized samples of ballots, because they're fucking morons who don't understand these things. So Big D will likely lose the cases and be gone in a month or two.
 
What is the correct outcome in all of this for you Ross?

If the DNC hadn't rigged the primaries , Bernie would be President now.

He's as dangerous to the globalists as Trump is so be couldn't be allowed to stand.

Much like Corbyn and Johnson are dangerous for them in the UK. Hence the press they receive.
 
If the DNC hadn't rigged the primaries , Bernie would be President now.

He's as dangerous to the globalists as Trump is so be couldn't be allowed to stand.

Much like Corbyn and Johnson are dangerous for them in the UK. Hence the press they receive.

What do you mean by 'globalists'?
Bernie would never have been president - a Jew as a president? Come on ... better chance of Jews controlling the media ... fuck, wait a second!
 
It's just not sexy.

And people claim that requiring people to have an ID is voter suppression so it's a very wide spectrum
The wide spectrum makes it easier to abuse, there are so many subtle ways it can be done.
 
The vast majority of votes that gave creepy joe the win came by post. There will be some real number of those that are fraudulent or illegal due to a technical error, and should not count. If you think the number is 0% you're an idiot. If you think it's 100%, you're probably a bigger idiot. Let's say it's 1%.

In an ideal world, you'd pick that 1% out and reject it. This is impossible to do. The best you can do is use your eye/algorithm to get as many as possible. The infuckingevitable consequence of that is you will 1. reject valid votes, 2. accept valid votes, 3. reject illegal votes, 4. accept illegal votes. It's just how statistical solutions work. So when you write up the code / pelosi machine to do this work, in an ideal world you will hit 1% by rejecting and accepting votes as per 1-4 above such that the total comes to 1%.

Now, if you change one parameter in that code on a whim, you'll reject 5%, change another and you reject 0.1% net. It's fucking arbitrary. So your election result is going to be arbitrary. That is a fraud against the people. If you don't like the word fraud, then call it statistically unrepresentative. It doesn't matter. The only way to prevent that fraud is not use mail in ballots in the first place, or if you did, then you need to go to court, analyse all the data, and check whether the arbitrary parameter they used in the voting machine corresponds to an actual 1% rate you measure in a sample of ballots. Not one of the stupid sources and fact check websites has the intelligence to understand this, because it involves some maths I guess, I don't know.

This is my issue with mail in voting. Not some 4chan conspiracy moron that you take me for. Y'all must have forgot who I am.
 
What do you mean by 'globalists'?
Bernie would never have been president - a Jew as a president? Come on ... better chance of Jews controlling the media ... fuck, wait a second!
An old white dude who can carry this handshake off can do anything.

p>
raw
 
Democrats: drops egg from window
Fake news: looks away
Trump: the egg is smashed you fools, we need a new egg
Fake news: Trump is claiming without evidence that the egg is smashed, there is no evidence of a smashed egg
Trump: asks court to look at the ground
Socialists: disgraceful president, sore loser, look at how McCain conceded, racist racist racist
Dantes: but gravity, 10m/s2, g, do the math, it smashed...
StevieM: you just made gravity up
Dantes:
 
If the DNC hadn't rigged the primaries , Bernie would be President now.

He's as dangerous to the globalists as Trump is so be couldn't be allowed to stand.

Much like Corbyn and Johnson are dangerous for them in the UK. Hence the press they receive.

Assuming that's true... what about in the here and now. Trump vs Biden.

Who should get the win?
 
Democrats: drops egg from window
Fake news: looks away
Trump: the egg is smashed you fools, we need a new egg
Fake news: Trump is claiming without evidence that the egg is smashed, there is no evidence of a smashed egg
Trump: asks court to look at the ground
Socialists: disgraceful president, sore loser, look at how McCain conceded, racist racist racist
Dantes: but gravity, 10m/s2, g, do the math, it smashed...
StevieM: you just made gravity up
Dantes:

The story is right. The names are wrong.

Swap Fake news for Trump.
Swap Trump for Real news.
Swap Socialist for Fascists
Swap Dantes for Stevie M.
Swap StevieM for Dantes.
 
The story is right. The names are wrong.

Swap Fake news for Trump.
Swap Trump for Real news.
Swap Socialist for Fascists
Swap Dantes for Stevie M.
Swap StevieM for Dantes.

Your story would need to be prefaced with that disclaimer. This is a work of fiction. Names, characters, businesses, places, events, locales, and incidents are either the products of the author's imagination or used in a fictitious manner. Any resemblance to actual persons, living or dead, or actual events is purely coincidental.
 
I'm gonna need a list of the globalists.
You mentioned Kier is one, cos he's been to the Bilderberg meetings.
Murdoch?
Owners of CNN etc?
Johnson isn't cos Brexit goes against the globalist agenda.. and for clarity what is the agenda?
 
PLus the problem is the globalists might not like Trump/Johnson but they could stop being sniveling self serving lying *****s it might help the cause a little.
 
Back
Top Bottom