• You may have to login or register before you can post and view our exclusive members only forums.
    To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Awww.. Even the back line is Bonding...

Status
Not open for further replies.

6TimesaRed

Not a Bot....
Administrator
... under Klopp...

0ae1e44246b5790743689c15ff22d907.jpg
 
Bizarre indeed. Couldn't care less if it works though. Are they even allowed to? Surely it infairly impedes movement of the opposing side just before the kick is taken?
 
My mate told me about this, I mentioned it the other day.

He's been doing some fitness thing that Liverpool coaches lay on for free (he had a brain tumour last year so was contacted about it), & he had them doing it in the match.

The idea behind it is to keep the line, obv, when you're defending set pieces, but also if you're in a wall for a free kick you tend to all push against each other which moves the wall from side to side & allows the opposition to stand in the wall or next to it do the same.

It also stops opposition players making late runs into the six yard box at corners cos they have no gap to run through.

The coach said technically it could be classed as obstruction if a player tries to run through their hands, but because it's in the area there's no ref that will give a penalty on the back of it!
 
I'm guessing that players can't claim obstruction before the ball is in play.. Once the kick is taken the hands come down. ( does this make sense)

Anyway it keeps you conscious of who is trying to break through..
 
We were doing this at the beginning of the season under Rodgers. Not that it worked particularly brilliantly, but he'd worked on a settled backline throughout the Summer and this is the kind of stuff we were doing in earlier games. It's nothing new, alot of teams practice it.

Arsenal did a similar "invisible rope" thing which helped forge the brilliance of the Dixon/Adams/Keown/Winterburn backline.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom