Top Of The Ignore List NSFW.
- Thread starter manwithnoname
- Start date
- Latest activity Latest activity:
[quote author=Spionkop69 link=topic=36961.msg981633#msg981633 date=1257601170]
I can't belive where this has ended up!
I'm as guilty as Mark for responding to Rage in an aggressive manner on the footie forum but in fairness to me and Mark, we tried debate and we were verbally abused by said poster. We responded in kind and I then made a conscious decision to try and ignore him. But, every thread was becoming polluted with his one-eyed, Rashid like, opinion.
Having frequented other forums where Rashid was a member, he was the same. Indeed DJ could be the same but both of them without the insults to fellow forumites and the manager and players. Both of these got booted from a number of forums for that. But Rage continued with his one man mission.
So yes, I did make a point of being abusive to him for my own personal pleasure. Its not big, its not clever, but it is ONLY the internet. Then along came the ignore function, which I wasn't sure whether I wanted to use but soon found it was brilliant when dealing with the likes of Rage and Zlatan on the footie forum. You just ignore them. Then of course we have the people who say using ignore is childish but also moan that abusing people is childish. Well, I prefer the first childish.
As for Rage, he was the one who started with the unprovoked insults to all and sundry. Dish it out, you got to take it back. [size=14pt][size=12pt]I'm not sure if I agree with the reasons behinmd his ban, but by god he needed banning. If people want people banned for personal abuse, then perhaps it should be down to the person being abuised. I don't get offended by Rage calling me a cunt. I get offended that a poster such as him can continue in a vein that is destructive for the site.
Final point, I'd take Ryan and Brendan over the internet tools any time. But like my responses to Rage, their abuse of certain posters on a consistent basis can be a little boring but laced with the odd laugh out loud classic. This is my fave forum by far. Don't go changing too much[/size]![/quote][/size]
This is exactly how I feel and I bet they majority would also agree with it. MODS take note.
Great post Jon.
I can't belive where this has ended up!
I'm as guilty as Mark for responding to Rage in an aggressive manner on the footie forum but in fairness to me and Mark, we tried debate and we were verbally abused by said poster. We responded in kind and I then made a conscious decision to try and ignore him. But, every thread was becoming polluted with his one-eyed, Rashid like, opinion.
Having frequented other forums where Rashid was a member, he was the same. Indeed DJ could be the same but both of them without the insults to fellow forumites and the manager and players. Both of these got booted from a number of forums for that. But Rage continued with his one man mission.
So yes, I did make a point of being abusive to him for my own personal pleasure. Its not big, its not clever, but it is ONLY the internet. Then along came the ignore function, which I wasn't sure whether I wanted to use but soon found it was brilliant when dealing with the likes of Rage and Zlatan on the footie forum. You just ignore them. Then of course we have the people who say using ignore is childish but also moan that abusing people is childish. Well, I prefer the first childish.
As for Rage, he was the one who started with the unprovoked insults to all and sundry. Dish it out, you got to take it back. [size=14pt][size=12pt]I'm not sure if I agree with the reasons behinmd his ban, but by god he needed banning. If people want people banned for personal abuse, then perhaps it should be down to the person being abuised. I don't get offended by Rage calling me a cunt. I get offended that a poster such as him can continue in a vein that is destructive for the site.
Final point, I'd take Ryan and Brendan over the internet tools any time. But like my responses to Rage, their abuse of certain posters on a consistent basis can be a little boring but laced with the odd laugh out loud classic. This is my fave forum by far. Don't go changing too much[/size]![/quote][/size]
This is exactly how I feel and I bet they majority would also agree with it. MODS take note.
Great post Jon.
[quote author=ILD link=topic=36961.msg981648#msg981648 date=1257602502]
[quote author=Spionkop69 link=topic=36961.msg981633#msg981633 date=1257601170]
I can't belive where this has ended up!
I'm as guilty as Mark for responding to Rage in an aggressive manner on the footie forum but in fairness to me and Mark, we tried debate and we were verbally abused by said poster. We responded in kind and I then made a conscious decision to try and ignore him. But, every thread was becoming polluted with his one-eyed, Rashid like, opinion.
Having frequented other forums where Rashid was a member, he was the same. Indeed DJ could be the same but both of them without the insults to fellow forumites and the manager and players. Both of these got booted from a number of forums for that. But Rage continued with his one man mission.
So yes, I did make a point of being abusive to him for my own personal pleasure. Its not big, its not clever, but it is ONLY the internet. Then along came the ignore function, which I wasn't sure whether I wanted to use but soon found it was brilliant when dealing with the likes of Rage and Zlatan on the footie forum. You just ignore them. Then of course we have the people who say using ignore is childish but also moan that abusing people is childish. Well, I prefer the first childish.
As for Rage, he was the one who started with the unprovoked insults to all and sundry. Dish it out, you got to take it back. [size=14pt][size=12pt]I'm not sure if I agree with the reasons behinmd his ban, but by god he needed banning. If people want people banned for personal abuse, then perhaps it should be down to the person being abuised. I don't get offended by Rage calling me a cunt. I get offended that a poster such as him can continue in a vein that is destructive for the site.
Final point, I'd take Ryan and Brendan over the internet tools any time. But like my responses to Rage, their abuse of certain posters on a consistent basis can be a little boring but laced with the odd laugh out loud classic. This is my fave forum by far. Don't go changing too much[/size]![/quote][/size]
This is exactly how I feel and I bet they majority would also agree with it. MODS take note.
Great post Jon.
[/quote]
x3
[quote author=Spionkop69 link=topic=36961.msg981633#msg981633 date=1257601170]
I can't belive where this has ended up!
I'm as guilty as Mark for responding to Rage in an aggressive manner on the footie forum but in fairness to me and Mark, we tried debate and we were verbally abused by said poster. We responded in kind and I then made a conscious decision to try and ignore him. But, every thread was becoming polluted with his one-eyed, Rashid like, opinion.
Having frequented other forums where Rashid was a member, he was the same. Indeed DJ could be the same but both of them without the insults to fellow forumites and the manager and players. Both of these got booted from a number of forums for that. But Rage continued with his one man mission.
So yes, I did make a point of being abusive to him for my own personal pleasure. Its not big, its not clever, but it is ONLY the internet. Then along came the ignore function, which I wasn't sure whether I wanted to use but soon found it was brilliant when dealing with the likes of Rage and Zlatan on the footie forum. You just ignore them. Then of course we have the people who say using ignore is childish but also moan that abusing people is childish. Well, I prefer the first childish.
As for Rage, he was the one who started with the unprovoked insults to all and sundry. Dish it out, you got to take it back. [size=14pt][size=12pt]I'm not sure if I agree with the reasons behinmd his ban, but by god he needed banning. If people want people banned for personal abuse, then perhaps it should be down to the person being abuised. I don't get offended by Rage calling me a cunt. I get offended that a poster such as him can continue in a vein that is destructive for the site.
Final point, I'd take Ryan and Brendan over the internet tools any time. But like my responses to Rage, their abuse of certain posters on a consistent basis can be a little boring but laced with the odd laugh out loud classic. This is my fave forum by far. Don't go changing too much[/size]![/quote][/size]
This is exactly how I feel and I bet they majority would also agree with it. MODS take note.
Great post Jon.
[/quote]
x3
Correct
[quote author=vantage link=topic=36961.msg981655#msg981655 date=1257602810]
[quote author=ILD link=topic=36961.msg981648#msg981648 date=1257602502]
[quote author=Spionkop69 link=topic=36961.msg981633#msg981633 date=1257601170]
I can't belive where this has ended up!
I'm as guilty as Mark for responding to Rage in an aggressive manner on the footie forum but in fairness to me and Mark, we tried debate and we were verbally abused by said poster. We responded in kind and I then made a conscious decision to try and ignore him. But, every thread was becoming polluted with his one-eyed, Rashid like, opinion.
Having frequented other forums where Rashid was a member, he was the same. Indeed DJ could be the same but both of them without the insults to fellow forumites and the manager and players. Both of these got booted from a number of forums for that. But Rage continued with his one man mission.
So yes, I did make a point of being abusive to him for my own personal pleasure. Its not big, its not clever, but it is ONLY the internet. Then along came the ignore function, which I wasn't sure whether I wanted to use but soon found it was brilliant when dealing with the likes of Rage and Zlatan on the footie forum. You just ignore them. Then of course we have the people who say using ignore is childish but also moan that abusing people is childish. Well, I prefer the first childish.
As for Rage, he was the one who started with the unprovoked insults to all and sundry. Dish it out, you got to take it back. [size=14pt][size=12pt]I'm not sure if I agree with the reasons behinmd his ban, but by god he needed banning. If people want people banned for personal abuse, then perhaps it should be down to the person being abuised. I don't get offended by Rage calling me a cunt. I get offended that a poster such as him can continue in a vein that is destructive for the site.
Final point, I'd take Ryan and Brendan over the internet tools any time. But like my responses to Rage, their abuse of certain posters on a consistent basis can be a little boring but laced with the odd laugh out loud classic. This is my fave forum by far. Don't go changing too much[/size]![/quote][/size]
This is exactly how I feel and I bet they majority would also agree with it. MODS take note.
Great post Jon.
[/quote]
x3
[/quote]
Vantage, such agreements don't help Ross's list of posters that hate me. I think he was relying on you.
-cheekycunt-
[quote author=ILD link=topic=36961.msg981648#msg981648 date=1257602502]
[quote author=Spionkop69 link=topic=36961.msg981633#msg981633 date=1257601170]
I can't belive where this has ended up!
I'm as guilty as Mark for responding to Rage in an aggressive manner on the footie forum but in fairness to me and Mark, we tried debate and we were verbally abused by said poster. We responded in kind and I then made a conscious decision to try and ignore him. But, every thread was becoming polluted with his one-eyed, Rashid like, opinion.
Having frequented other forums where Rashid was a member, he was the same. Indeed DJ could be the same but both of them without the insults to fellow forumites and the manager and players. Both of these got booted from a number of forums for that. But Rage continued with his one man mission.
So yes, I did make a point of being abusive to him for my own personal pleasure. Its not big, its not clever, but it is ONLY the internet. Then along came the ignore function, which I wasn't sure whether I wanted to use but soon found it was brilliant when dealing with the likes of Rage and Zlatan on the footie forum. You just ignore them. Then of course we have the people who say using ignore is childish but also moan that abusing people is childish. Well, I prefer the first childish.
As for Rage, he was the one who started with the unprovoked insults to all and sundry. Dish it out, you got to take it back. [size=14pt][size=12pt]I'm not sure if I agree with the reasons behinmd his ban, but by god he needed banning. If people want people banned for personal abuse, then perhaps it should be down to the person being abuised. I don't get offended by Rage calling me a cunt. I get offended that a poster such as him can continue in a vein that is destructive for the site.
Final point, I'd take Ryan and Brendan over the internet tools any time. But like my responses to Rage, their abuse of certain posters on a consistent basis can be a little boring but laced with the odd laugh out loud classic. This is my fave forum by far. Don't go changing too much[/size]![/quote][/size]
This is exactly how I feel and I bet they majority would also agree with it. MODS take note.
Great post Jon.
[/quote]
x3
[/quote]
Vantage, such agreements don't help Ross's list of posters that hate me. I think he was relying on you.
-cheekycunt-
[quote author=Ryan link=topic=36961.msg981663#msg981663 date=1257603014]
Vantage, such agreements don't help Ross's list of posters that hate me. I think he was relying on you.
-cheekycunt-
[/quote]
Haha. You've mellowed a bit. I think. Or maybe you look less cuntish because of rage? Whatever.... feel free to remind me I said this one day.
Vantage, such agreements don't help Ross's list of posters that hate me. I think he was relying on you.
-cheekycunt-
[/quote]
Haha. You've mellowed a bit. I think. Or maybe you look less cuntish because of rage? Whatever.... feel free to remind me I said this one day.
[quote author=vantage link=topic=36961.msg981673#msg981673 date=1257603304]
[quote author=Ryan link=topic=36961.msg981663#msg981663 date=1257603014]
Vantage, such agreements don't help Ross's list of posters that hate me. I think he was relying on you.
-cheekycunt-
[/quote]
Haha. You've mellowed a bit. I think. Or maybe you look less cuntish because of rage? Whatever.... feel free to remind me I said this one day.
[/quote]
Thank you Vantage. I've made an effort to get on better with those that I had disagreements with prior to my banning; you, D-Mac, Sheik, Sunny, Anita, JJ, themn, a few others too.
Vlad's next. He doesn't know it yet, but soon he and I will be exchanging Xmas e-cards.
[quote author=Ryan link=topic=36961.msg981663#msg981663 date=1257603014]
Vantage, such agreements don't help Ross's list of posters that hate me. I think he was relying on you.
-cheekycunt-
[/quote]
Haha. You've mellowed a bit. I think. Or maybe you look less cuntish because of rage? Whatever.... feel free to remind me I said this one day.
[/quote]
Thank you Vantage. I've made an effort to get on better with those that I had disagreements with prior to my banning; you, D-Mac, Sheik, Sunny, Anita, JJ, themn, a few others too.
Vlad's next. He doesn't know it yet, but soon he and I will be exchanging Xmas e-cards.
Sunny's conduct on this thread with Dossena is a perfect example of how Modding should be done. Dossena is too stupid to realise that something he's posted to offend Rage on account of him being Muslim is in fact insulting to all Muslims and so he's stepped in accordingly.
How it should be done.
How it should be done.
[quote author=themn link=topic=36961.msg981793#msg981793 date=1257612531]
Who is R2-D2's favourite footballer ?
Papa Bouba Diop.
[/quote]
hahahahaha.
Excellent.
Who is R2-D2's favourite footballer ?
Papa Bouba Diop.
[/quote]
hahahahaha.
Excellent.
[quote author=themn link=topic=36961.msg981793#msg981793 date=1257612531]
Who is R2-D2's favourite footballer ?
Papa Bouba Diop.
[/quote]
not bad.
more star wars jokes please.
Who is R2-D2's favourite footballer ?
Papa Bouba Diop.
[/quote]
not bad.
more star wars jokes please.
[quote author=dossena link=topic=36961.msg981472#msg981472 date=1257583557]
[quote author=darkstarexodus link=topic=36961.msg981452#msg981452 date=1257569133]
Sheik, for what it's worth, I agree 100% with your long post above. Brendan and Ryan are probably my two favorite posters to read on this site (God I hate inflating their egos like this) but they (and others) definitely operate on different rules to certain forum pariahs. I don't have a problem with that at all because I do not want them banned, nor do I particularly want them to water themselves down. Everyone should just wind their necks in a bit and not get so worked up. It's a fucking internet forum. I'd bring out the "arguing on the internet is like winning the Special Olympics" pic but it's a bit cliched.
Anyways, you're all a bunch of cunts. And that's fine.
[/quote]
That's just shit though isn't it?
So who else does the "untouchable" list include? Is there any criteria for one to be included?
What if say, Glock's favorite posters were Zlatan and Rage and Glock felt that they should (God help us all) have different set of rules to regular posters?
It's too subjective for it to work. Everyone should adhere to the same set of rules, and if that's a bit hard, then you shouldn't have one?
Btw, I still want the Momo cartoon back up.
[/quote]
I didn't say I thought anyone was untouchable. Just that it's clear that certain ppl are treated differently and I wouldn't want them pulled back down. Personally, I'm in favour of very limited moderation because if I wanted rules and laws I'd go back to work.
While I wish Rage would get beyond his one-issue platform in FF, I have no problem with him at all and find his posts in the other forums just fine. I also didn't have a particular problem with Roger or Ardja and engaged them in threads as well. In fact, if anything, I become sympathetic to posters who become pariahs on the site.
I think Misred (happy birthday BTW!) said it best when she said everyone on here is worse than a bunch of women with PMT. I genuinely don't understand why everyone gets so worked up.
As for the Momo cartoon, I personally think it's crossing the line. And yes, I do realise that's giving Islam a bit of special treatment when compared to some of the other issues or peoples lampooned on here.
[quote author=darkstarexodus link=topic=36961.msg981452#msg981452 date=1257569133]
Sheik, for what it's worth, I agree 100% with your long post above. Brendan and Ryan are probably my two favorite posters to read on this site (God I hate inflating their egos like this) but they (and others) definitely operate on different rules to certain forum pariahs. I don't have a problem with that at all because I do not want them banned, nor do I particularly want them to water themselves down. Everyone should just wind their necks in a bit and not get so worked up. It's a fucking internet forum. I'd bring out the "arguing on the internet is like winning the Special Olympics" pic but it's a bit cliched.
Anyways, you're all a bunch of cunts. And that's fine.
[/quote]
That's just shit though isn't it?
So who else does the "untouchable" list include? Is there any criteria for one to be included?
What if say, Glock's favorite posters were Zlatan and Rage and Glock felt that they should (God help us all) have different set of rules to regular posters?
It's too subjective for it to work. Everyone should adhere to the same set of rules, and if that's a bit hard, then you shouldn't have one?
Btw, I still want the Momo cartoon back up.
[/quote]
I didn't say I thought anyone was untouchable. Just that it's clear that certain ppl are treated differently and I wouldn't want them pulled back down. Personally, I'm in favour of very limited moderation because if I wanted rules and laws I'd go back to work.
While I wish Rage would get beyond his one-issue platform in FF, I have no problem with him at all and find his posts in the other forums just fine. I also didn't have a particular problem with Roger or Ardja and engaged them in threads as well. In fact, if anything, I become sympathetic to posters who become pariahs on the site.
I think Misred (happy birthday BTW!) said it best when she said everyone on here is worse than a bunch of women with PMT. I genuinely don't understand why everyone gets so worked up.
As for the Momo cartoon, I personally think it's crossing the line. And yes, I do realise that's giving Islam a bit of special treatment when compared to some of the other issues or peoples lampooned on here.
Now, as you all well know, I'm not adverse to people having things stuck up their arses . . .
But far too many people have got their heads up there at the minute
But far too many people have got their heads up there at the minute
[quote author=Rosco link=topic=36961.msg981324#msg981324 date=1257540853]
You're all fucking hypocrites.
[/quote]
Why so?
You're all fucking hypocrites.
[/quote]
Why so?
[quote author=ILD link=topic=36961.msg981368#msg981368 date=1257547257]
[quote author=gkmacca link=topic=36961.msg981359#msg981359 date=1257545537]
[quote author=ILD link=topic=36961.msg981346#msg981346 date=1257544865]
I don't believe for a minute that anyone has another poster on ignore. [/quote]
Click on their profile, then. In this Enlightenment age, you'll be able to disabuse yourself of that belief instantly.
[/quote]
Obviously people do, but I don't understand why people would place another user on ignore. What's the point?
Take your duel with Rage for example; Ye clash all over the forum but ye secretly enjoy the charade and ye can't resist the temptation to continue it, so I doubt ye could put each other on ignore.
cf. Ryan & DB.
DB's post's irritate Ryan, but I doubt Ryan would put him on ignore and miss the chance to pick up on more classic Dreambeliver lines. (Ha! No offence Pat).
Don't get me wrong I enjoy reading the online battles between posters, they're great.
Putting people on ignore is petty and gay. Just my opinion though.
[/quote]
Ha ha Fuck you Dave 😀
I still reckon myself and Ryan would get on in person
if he wasn't such a cunt to everyone that disagreed with him.
Shit is that me banned now?
Oh well.
[quote author=gkmacca link=topic=36961.msg981359#msg981359 date=1257545537]
[quote author=ILD link=topic=36961.msg981346#msg981346 date=1257544865]
I don't believe for a minute that anyone has another poster on ignore. [/quote]
Click on their profile, then. In this Enlightenment age, you'll be able to disabuse yourself of that belief instantly.
[/quote]
Obviously people do, but I don't understand why people would place another user on ignore. What's the point?
Take your duel with Rage for example; Ye clash all over the forum but ye secretly enjoy the charade and ye can't resist the temptation to continue it, so I doubt ye could put each other on ignore.
cf. Ryan & DB.
DB's post's irritate Ryan, but I doubt Ryan would put him on ignore and miss the chance to pick up on more classic Dreambeliver lines. (Ha! No offence Pat).
Don't get me wrong I enjoy reading the online battles between posters, they're great.
Putting people on ignore is petty and gay. Just my opinion though.
[/quote]
Ha ha Fuck you Dave 😀
I still reckon myself and Ryan would get on in person
if he wasn't such a cunt to everyone that disagreed with him.
Shit is that me banned now?
Oh well.
[quote author=Sunny link=topic=36961.msg981418#msg981418 date=1257556641]
[quote author=dossena link=topic=36961.msg981417#msg981417 date=1257556401]
Doesn't the freedom of speech apply here?
He called me a cunt too, which I found offensive. He in fact has been very offensive on this thread.
If he doesn't like it he doesn't have to view it.
There's a gif of a girl sucking a massive dong for fuck's sake, I'm sure the ladies would find offensive.
I'd appreciate it if you reinstate the cartoon that I posted, thank you.
[/quote]
It's not freedom of speech it's shit stirring. It's not getting reinstated and I wouldn't advise you do it either. As for the gif - is someone complains it'll get removed.
All I've seen in this thread is a lot of people acting like a gang of twats. And we wonder why we have few new members
[/quote]
I've spoken to a fair few Liverpool fans over here both from home and Australia about joining the site.
Obviously I haven't mentioned that I'm dreambeliever (Oh the shame) but every single one has said they lurked and thought the place was nuts and would never post out of fear of being ripped apart for having a different viewpoint.
[quote author=dossena link=topic=36961.msg981417#msg981417 date=1257556401]
Doesn't the freedom of speech apply here?
He called me a cunt too, which I found offensive. He in fact has been very offensive on this thread.
If he doesn't like it he doesn't have to view it.
There's a gif of a girl sucking a massive dong for fuck's sake, I'm sure the ladies would find offensive.
I'd appreciate it if you reinstate the cartoon that I posted, thank you.
[/quote]
It's not freedom of speech it's shit stirring. It's not getting reinstated and I wouldn't advise you do it either. As for the gif - is someone complains it'll get removed.
All I've seen in this thread is a lot of people acting like a gang of twats. And we wonder why we have few new members
[/quote]
I've spoken to a fair few Liverpool fans over here both from home and Australia about joining the site.
Obviously I haven't mentioned that I'm dreambeliever (Oh the shame) but every single one has said they lurked and thought the place was nuts and would never post out of fear of being ripped apart for having a different viewpoint.
[quote author=Dreambeliever link=topic=36961.msg982636#msg982636 date=1257690211]
[quote author=Sunny link=topic=36961.msg981418#msg981418 date=1257556641]
[quote author=dossena link=topic=36961.msg981417#msg981417 date=1257556401]
Doesn't the freedom of speech apply here?
He called me a cunt too, which I found offensive. He in fact has been very offensive on this thread.
If he doesn't like it he doesn't have to view it.
There's a gif of a girl sucking a massive dong for fuck's sake, I'm sure the ladies would find offensive.
I'd appreciate it if you reinstate the cartoon that I posted, thank you.
[/quote]
It's not freedom of speech it's shit stirring. It's not getting reinstated and I wouldn't advise you do it either. As for the gif - is someone complains it'll get removed.
All I've seen in this thread is a lot of people acting like a gang of twats. And we wonder why we have few new members
[/quote]
I've spoken to a fair few Liverpool fans over here both from home and Australia about joining the site.
Obviously I haven't mentioned that I'm dreambeliever (Oh the shame) but every single one has said they lurked and thought the place was nuts and would never post out of fear of being ripped apart for having a different viewpoint.
[/quote]
I dread to think what they'll think about most of the other sites then! Tell them to go on to YNWA and do something like call the premier league the 'EPL'. THAT'S an OTT reaction. (Even though I hate the phrase!)
[quote author=Sunny link=topic=36961.msg981418#msg981418 date=1257556641]
[quote author=dossena link=topic=36961.msg981417#msg981417 date=1257556401]
Doesn't the freedom of speech apply here?
He called me a cunt too, which I found offensive. He in fact has been very offensive on this thread.
If he doesn't like it he doesn't have to view it.
There's a gif of a girl sucking a massive dong for fuck's sake, I'm sure the ladies would find offensive.
I'd appreciate it if you reinstate the cartoon that I posted, thank you.
[/quote]
It's not freedom of speech it's shit stirring. It's not getting reinstated and I wouldn't advise you do it either. As for the gif - is someone complains it'll get removed.
All I've seen in this thread is a lot of people acting like a gang of twats. And we wonder why we have few new members
[/quote]
I've spoken to a fair few Liverpool fans over here both from home and Australia about joining the site.
Obviously I haven't mentioned that I'm dreambeliever (Oh the shame) but every single one has said they lurked and thought the place was nuts and would never post out of fear of being ripped apart for having a different viewpoint.
[/quote]
I dread to think what they'll think about most of the other sites then! Tell them to go on to YNWA and do something like call the premier league the 'EPL'. THAT'S an OTT reaction. (Even though I hate the phrase!)
