[quote author=peterhague link=topic=42930.msg1230570#msg1230570 date=1291817820]
[quote author=Halmeister link=topic=42930.msg1230564#msg1230564 date=1291817039]
[quote author=Akakabooto link=topic=42930.msg1230563#msg1230563 date=1291816860]
[quote author=Halmeister link=topic=42930.msg1230561#msg1230561 date=1291816640]
Suarez stopped the goal. There was no doubt it was going in. Unless they awarded the goal AND sent Suarez off (not in the rules I know) it wasn't fair.
There's always a chance you'll miss a penalty. But the ball was 100% going in when Suarez handballed it.
I'd still take him, though. Oh and shock horror, Tottenham linked to another player with a pulse.
[/quote]
I just fail to see how it's different from any other foul like it? If a defender stops opponent getting clean through he gets a red and they get a free kick. There is far less chance scoring from a free kick than from a one on one.
[/quote]
It's different, though, have you not seen it or something? The ball was about to hit the net. The ball was 100% going in, but there's always a chance you'll miss the penalty. It wasn't fair in the slightest.
[/quote]
i agree, but tbf it's not really suarez's fault - a lot of players would do the same - it's more that the rule is completely inadequate. in situations like that they should be using video technology to either award a goal directly, or at least effectively, perhaps by gving a PK with no goalkeeper involved, just a simple kick into an empty goal.
a red card wouldn't be needed then, it could be yellow instead. i've thought they've needed to change the rule since lucas had his derby-winning goal chalked off in 2007 by a phil neville handball: it was almost exactly the same situation, late in the game, and howard even nearly saved kuyt's penalty.
[/quote]
Oh I know, I don't blame Suarez at all. I can see why he did it. I just take exception to the view that "it was Ghana's own fault."