[quote author=Herr Onceared link=topic=40759.msg1130794#msg1130794 date=1278242460]
Are we now just ignoring the fact Purslow DID find investment time and again only for the owners to reject the offers. His job was to seek out investment which he did. After the event the owners put the club up for sale.
[/quote]
Clearly we are.
We're also assuming that Broughton came in cos he failed, not that he was appointed by RBS to ensure the owners couldnt continue to block the sale they want. Which is odd, cos SoS admit he's RBS appointment.
As for this site being against SoS, that's bollocks. I dont agree with the way they act like they're speaking on behalf of all the fans, I dont agree with some of their founder member choices as many of them had less than pleasant backgrounds & I felt that prejudiced their stance. I also dont agree with some of their more militant acts, as I believe that portrays themselves badly in the media, which is the opposite of what we want. On top of all that I dont agree that they should have a place on the board, it should be a fans position, voted for by season ticket & fancard holders who attend a certain number of games only.
For all that though, I applaud their willingness to stand up & be counted, I appluad their intentions, & I fully support a number of their acts. The Independence day today, is an exceptionally good idea, getting good publicity around the campaign & highlighting the clubs situation. I think they have made the tenure of the owners shorter than they may have liked & some (not all) of the pressure applied to RBS I believe has had an effect. I also believe their actions in not allowing negative chants during the games & their 'lock ins' to gain more publicity have allowed fans to support the team & yet showed our displeasure to a great many.
So no, I dont personally belong to SoS, but to say I, or anyone else on here, is simply against them is bollocks.