Re: The Suarez/Evra Racism Row (continued)
Right the much cleverer than me merry band are out in force, so I won't bother to reply to you all individually.
Here's the the important evidence:
Evra accuses Suarez of calling him a negro, Suarez admits to saying it.
The FA Panel has to decide whether to find Luis guilty or not, knowing that the media spotlight is on them. Knowing full well their decision is setting a high profile precedent that will be followed in future.
You expect them to deem it okay for Suarez to call Evra a negro, on the basis that either:
a) it's not offensive where he comes from
b) it was said in Spanish, not English
c) it was said in a friendly manner
If the FA Panel follows that line of argument, think of the precedent that sets:
If you're playing football in England you can call a black man a negro so long as you either:
a) Say Negro in Spanish, not English
b) claim where you grew up it's not offensive
c) claim to have said it in a friendly manner.
Now given the FA are committed to trying to eradicate racism and not encourage it, which decision is more likely to achieve that? Do you send out a message that you won't tolerate people being called negro, or say you can call people negro so long as you use one of our convenient list of excuses to get yourself off ?
They were never going to say: "you can use Negro in certain circumstances" - It's much easier and much more preferable to not allow it all. Do you really want genuinely racist cunts having an easy way out like that ?
And lastly some of the people posting in defence of using negro because it's in Spanish should go back and read some old threads, particularly re Fabregas , Aragones or even fucking Paddy and see how much your own opinion now a Liverpool player is involved is at variance with what you said back then.
Actually fuck it, I'll post some of them:
LTW on Cesc's comment (where he used negro) to Kanoute (in Spanish and in Spain):
Doc Mac on a thread regarding themn taking issue with Ryan calling Thierry Henry fat lipped:
Vantage's comments on the same thread:
Spionkop in the same thread:
I'm not posting any further on the topic.
Right the much cleverer than me merry band are out in force, so I won't bother to reply to you all individually.
Here's the the important evidence:
Evra accuses Suarez of calling him a negro, Suarez admits to saying it.
The FA Panel has to decide whether to find Luis guilty or not, knowing that the media spotlight is on them. Knowing full well their decision is setting a high profile precedent that will be followed in future.
You expect them to deem it okay for Suarez to call Evra a negro, on the basis that either:
a) it's not offensive where he comes from
b) it was said in Spanish, not English
c) it was said in a friendly manner
If the FA Panel follows that line of argument, think of the precedent that sets:
If you're playing football in England you can call a black man a negro so long as you either:
a) Say Negro in Spanish, not English
b) claim where you grew up it's not offensive
c) claim to have said it in a friendly manner.
Now given the FA are committed to trying to eradicate racism and not encourage it, which decision is more likely to achieve that? Do you send out a message that you won't tolerate people being called negro, or say you can call people negro so long as you use one of our convenient list of excuses to get yourself off ?
They were never going to say: "you can use Negro in certain circumstances" - It's much easier and much more preferable to not allow it all. Do you really want genuinely racist cunts having an easy way out like that ?
And lastly some of the people posting in defence of using negro because it's in Spanish should go back and read some old threads, particularly re Fabregas , Aragones or even fucking Paddy and see how much your own opinion now a Liverpool player is involved is at variance with what you said back then.
Actually fuck it, I'll post some of them:
LTW on Cesc's comment (where he used negro) to Kanoute (in Spanish and in Spain):
I think IF Cesc said those things, it's disgraceful AND wrong
Doc Mac on a thread regarding themn taking issue with Ryan calling Thierry Henry fat lipped:
If Themn took offence then it is reason enough. A focus on racial characteristics in an otherwise humourous rant is unacceptable. I take Mamma Mia's posts with the respect they deserve as someone who has been on the rough end of discriminatory behaviour, but it was still inappropriate. I like Ryan a lot, and think he is one of the best posters in this site, but he needs to wise the bap with comments which are likely to cause offence. His comments are accretive in their ability to cause offence. If somebody without form for racial slurs on black people had posted this I'm sure Themn would have been less sensitive. In this case I completely understand.
Vantage's comments on the same thread:
MM, I'm not the most politically correct person on here, yet even I would agree that comments like that can be taken as having racist feelings.
Did Ryan mean it? I doubt it. Is Themn right in taking offence? Of course. If he wants to, which he clearly does.
Spionkop in the same thread:
Does that mean its not racist or that its water off a duck's back to you?
Using "fat lipped" towards somebody black is generally considered a racial slur in this country.
I'm not posting any further on the topic.