WHEN the Luis Suarez race row took two months to reach a conclusion, the last thing I expected as the verdict came was another can of worms to burst open.
But ever since the Liverpool striker was handed an eight-game ban for racially abusing Patrice Evra, that's exactly what has happened.
What a mess it has become. Yet what an avoidable one it could have been had things been handled differently.
If Suarez is bang to rights then, yes, of course he should face a lengthy ban. Yet the way the Independent Disciplinary Commission — and subsequent FA statement — went about things has in many ways muddied the waters even more.
All we know so far is that Evra accused the Liverpool forward of racial abuse and the verdict has been reached on the back of that.
Clearly you would imagine there must be more to it than that — so why now does everyone have to wait until the written judgment is delivered for a full explanation? In my book, any grey areas could have been so easily avoided.
Any Merseyside calls of a witch-hunt would have been nipped in the bud. Instead, given the lack of public evidence regarding the exact details of the case, there is still a huge sense of mystery.
Surely it would have made more sense for the written proof, which everyone is waiting for, to have been published on the day of the verdict.
Whether people agreed with their findings would have been irrelevant.
The fact is that no one could argue over the clarity of the decision because the ins and outs would have been there for all to see.
The FA have admitted the written judgment, when it's delivered to Liverpool, will be made available in the public domain.
At that point, of course, we will discover their reasons for the eight-game ban. But we could have known that NOW if they had gone about things differently.
Now all we've got is another bout of name calling from Liverpool to the FA and it's not doing anybody any favours. As I said, if Suarez is guilty as charged, then some could say he is lucky to have escaped with the suspension he has.
But, at the moment, I have to say I think the punishment — on all public evidence — is ridiculously harsh because it was based only on what Patrice said he was called.
Look, I am all for racial abuse carrying the strongest possible punishment but, come on man, let's see that evidence.
All Tuesday's decision has done is give fuel to the sceptics who reckon the race card has been played here — and it's so stupid, so easily avoided.
Let's get one thing straight immediately. I am not calling Evra a liar, far from it, because something obviously went on.
But as it is, this could be said to have opened the way for any black player who might have an axe to grind to accuse others in a similar way — and that sets a very dangerous precedent indeed.
It has paved the way for any player to accuse another of anything.
I'm not for one second saying Patrice didn't have a legitimate case. I'm just worried about what less trustworthy players might get up to.
And I'm not going to stand here and say — on what we know so far — what should or shouldn't happen.
But if they have proof, then let's see it and let's see it now.
If there was TV evidence then tell us. Let us know how they reached that verdict at the same time they delivered it. We haven't seen any film of the incident. Perhaps that suggests there isn't any.
If Suarez is as guilty as the commission found then fine — he deserves his punishment.
But, for heaven's sake, let's see the proof because until that's out there, the rows will only get worse.
And the sad thing is they could have all been avoided in the first place.