[quote author=Jack D Rips link=topic=47188.msg1448287#msg1448287 date=1324417758]
Can someone tell me what rule E3(1) and E3(2) say please?
[/quote]
Anyone?
Can someone tell me what rule E3(1) and E3(2) say please?
[/quote]
Anyone?
The Suarez/Evra Racism Row
- Thread starter Stulikesdrums
- Start date
- Latest activity Latest activity:
[quote author=mark1975 link=topic=47188.msg1448306#msg1448306 date=1324418193]
The club statement is commendable and it's got balls.
The problem now is that every cunt is going to abuse this ruling, you'll get players pulling the racist card left right and centre and meanwhile the FA have now set a precedent which I doubt will be upheld for EBJT, or anyone else.
This seems to all stem from Rafa's 'rant' which was the first public questioning of the FA's bias in favour of United and Fergie, it's been a long road in which they've proven that he still has an unnerving power and influence over the English game and it's points of leadership.
As for Luis, well having a black father and having played alongside multi cultural players for years without any hint of this before, doesn't seem to hold any sway as far as the FA go, no further damning evidence has been brought forward during the enquiry and it's been magnificently timed (as only the FA could, remember Ferdinand returning from his ban against us?), to hit before the busiest and one of the most crucial period's of the season. If Luis' downfall in this is that he isn't quite as black as Evra, and ergo, must be the guilty party, then I think the FA need only look in the mirror to find the racists. As for Luis keeping Schtum on the pitch, what like Rooney? It's part of his game, his nature and his winning mentality, if you take that from him you may aswell give him a one way pass to Barcelona right now.
He's ours and he deserves the benefit of the doubt, given who the cunts are calling the shots, he deserves all the backing he gets.
[/quote]
Well said Mark.
The club statement is commendable and it's got balls.
The problem now is that every cunt is going to abuse this ruling, you'll get players pulling the racist card left right and centre and meanwhile the FA have now set a precedent which I doubt will be upheld for EBJT, or anyone else.
This seems to all stem from Rafa's 'rant' which was the first public questioning of the FA's bias in favour of United and Fergie, it's been a long road in which they've proven that he still has an unnerving power and influence over the English game and it's points of leadership.
As for Luis, well having a black father and having played alongside multi cultural players for years without any hint of this before, doesn't seem to hold any sway as far as the FA go, no further damning evidence has been brought forward during the enquiry and it's been magnificently timed (as only the FA could, remember Ferdinand returning from his ban against us?), to hit before the busiest and one of the most crucial period's of the season. If Luis' downfall in this is that he isn't quite as black as Evra, and ergo, must be the guilty party, then I think the FA need only look in the mirror to find the racists. As for Luis keeping Schtum on the pitch, what like Rooney? It's part of his game, his nature and his winning mentality, if you take that from him you may aswell give him a one way pass to Barcelona right now.
He's ours and he deserves the benefit of the doubt, given who the cunts are calling the shots, he deserves all the backing he gets.
[/quote]
Well said Mark.
[quote author=mark1975 link=topic=47188.msg1448306#msg1448306 date=1324418193]
The club statement is commendable and it's got balls.
The problem now is that every cunt is going to abuse this ruling, you'll get players pulling the racist card left right and centre and meanwhile the FA have now set a precedent which I doubt will be upheld for EBJT, or anyone else.
This seems to all stem from Rafa's 'rant' which was the first public questioning of the FA's bias in favour of United and Fergie, it's been a long road in which they've proven that he still has an unnerving power and influence over the English game and it's points of leadership.
As for Luis, well having a black father and having played alongside multi cultural players for years without any hint of this before, doesn't seem to hold any sway as far as the FA go, no further damning evidence has been brought forward during the enquiry and it's been magnificently timed (as only the FA could, remember Ferdinand returning from his ban against us?), to hit before the busiest and one of the most crucial period's of the season. If Luis' downfall in this is that he isn't quite as black as Evra, and ergo, must be the guilty party, then I think the FA need only look in the mirror to find the racists. As for Luis keeping Schtum on the pitch, what like Rooney? It's part of his game, his nature and his winning mentality, if you take that from him you may aswell give him a one way pass to Barcelona right now.
He's ours and he deserves the benefit of the doubt, given who the cunts are calling the shots, he deserves all the backing he gets.
[/quote]
Thundering great nail/head interface.
The club statement is commendable and it's got balls.
The problem now is that every cunt is going to abuse this ruling, you'll get players pulling the racist card left right and centre and meanwhile the FA have now set a precedent which I doubt will be upheld for EBJT, or anyone else.
This seems to all stem from Rafa's 'rant' which was the first public questioning of the FA's bias in favour of United and Fergie, it's been a long road in which they've proven that he still has an unnerving power and influence over the English game and it's points of leadership.
As for Luis, well having a black father and having played alongside multi cultural players for years without any hint of this before, doesn't seem to hold any sway as far as the FA go, no further damning evidence has been brought forward during the enquiry and it's been magnificently timed (as only the FA could, remember Ferdinand returning from his ban against us?), to hit before the busiest and one of the most crucial period's of the season. If Luis' downfall in this is that he isn't quite as black as Evra, and ergo, must be the guilty party, then I think the FA need only look in the mirror to find the racists. As for Luis keeping Schtum on the pitch, what like Rooney? It's part of his game, his nature and his winning mentality, if you take that from him you may aswell give him a one way pass to Barcelona right now.
He's ours and he deserves the benefit of the doubt, given who the cunts are calling the shots, he deserves all the backing he gets.
[/quote]
Thundering great nail/head interface.
I trust Kenny Dalglish.
[quote author=mark1975 link=topic=47188.msg1448306#msg1448306 date=1324418193]
The problem now is that every cunt is going to abuse this ruling, you'll get players pulling the racist card left right and centre [/quote]
Except ours, of course.
The problem now is that every cunt is going to abuse this ruling, you'll get players pulling the racist card left right and centre [/quote]
Except ours, of course.
[quote author=Jack D Rips link=topic=47188.msg1448312#msg1448312 date=1324418407]
[quote author=Jack D Rips link=topic=47188.msg1448287#msg1448287 date=1324417758]
Can someone tell me what rule E3(1) and E3(2) say please?
[/quote]
Anyone?
[/quote]
Rule E3 General Behaviour
3 (1) A Participant shall at all times act in the best interests of the game and shall not
act in any manner which is improper or brings the game into disrepute or use any
one, or a combination of, violent conduct, serious foul play, threatening, abusive,
indecent or insulting words or behaviour.
(2) In the event of any breach of Rule E 3(1) including a reference to any one or more
of a person’s ethnic origin, colour, race, nationality, faith, gender, sexual orientation
or disability (an “aggravating factor”), a Regulatory Commission shall consider
the imposition of an increased sanction, taking into account the following entry
points:
For a first offence, a sanction that is double that which the Regulatory Commission
would have applied had the aggravating factor not been present.
For a second offence, a sanction that is treble that which the Regulatory
Commission would have applied had the aggravating factor not been present.
Any further such offence(s) shall give rise to consideration of a permanent
suspension.
These entry points are intended to guide the Regulatory Commission and are not
mandatory.
The Regulatory Commission shall have the discretion to impose a sanction greater
or less than the entry point, according to the aggravating or mitigating factors
present in each case.
Commission would have applied had the aggravating factor not been present.
Any further such offence(s) shall give rise to consideration of a permanent
suspension.
These entry points are intended to guide the Regulatory Commission and are not
mandatory.
The Regulatory Commission shall have the discretion to impose a sanction greater
or less than the entry point, according to the aggravating or mitigating factors
present in each case.
Rule E4 covers discrimination.
[quote author=Jack D Rips link=topic=47188.msg1448287#msg1448287 date=1324417758]
Can someone tell me what rule E3(1) and E3(2) say please?
[/quote]
Anyone?
[/quote]
Rule E3 General Behaviour
3 (1) A Participant shall at all times act in the best interests of the game and shall not
act in any manner which is improper or brings the game into disrepute or use any
one, or a combination of, violent conduct, serious foul play, threatening, abusive,
indecent or insulting words or behaviour.
(2) In the event of any breach of Rule E 3(1) including a reference to any one or more
of a person’s ethnic origin, colour, race, nationality, faith, gender, sexual orientation
or disability (an “aggravating factor”), a Regulatory Commission shall consider
the imposition of an increased sanction, taking into account the following entry
points:
For a first offence, a sanction that is double that which the Regulatory Commission
would have applied had the aggravating factor not been present.
For a second offence, a sanction that is treble that which the Regulatory
Commission would have applied had the aggravating factor not been present.
Any further such offence(s) shall give rise to consideration of a permanent
suspension.
These entry points are intended to guide the Regulatory Commission and are not
mandatory.
The Regulatory Commission shall have the discretion to impose a sanction greater
or less than the entry point, according to the aggravating or mitigating factors
present in each case.
Commission would have applied had the aggravating factor not been present.
Any further such offence(s) shall give rise to consideration of a permanent
suspension.
These entry points are intended to guide the Regulatory Commission and are not
mandatory.
The Regulatory Commission shall have the discretion to impose a sanction greater
or less than the entry point, according to the aggravating or mitigating factors
present in each case.
Rule E4 covers discrimination.
[quote author=gene hughes link=topic=47188.msg1448316#msg1448316 date=1324418613]
[quote author=mark1975 link=topic=47188.msg1448306#msg1448306 date=1324418193]
The problem now is that every cunt is going to abuse this ruling, you'll get players pulling the racist card left right and centre [/quote]
Except ours, of course.
[/quote]
Point? I don't know where you're coming from with your posts in this thread Gene.
[quote author=mark1975 link=topic=47188.msg1448306#msg1448306 date=1324418193]
The problem now is that every cunt is going to abuse this ruling, you'll get players pulling the racist card left right and centre [/quote]
Except ours, of course.
[/quote]
Point? I don't know where you're coming from with your posts in this thread Gene.
Let's see what happens with this bit:
We would also like to know when the FA intend to charge Patrice Evra with making abusive remarks to an opponent after he admitted himself in his evidence to insulting Luis Suarez in Spanish in the most objectionable of terms. Luis, to his credit, actually told the FA he had not heard the insult.
We would also like to know when the FA intend to charge Patrice Evra with making abusive remarks to an opponent after he admitted himself in his evidence to insulting Luis Suarez in Spanish in the most objectionable of terms. Luis, to his credit, actually told the FA he had not heard the insult.
R
RedZeppelin
Guest
One thing i'm wondering ...if he is found guilty , could the police request the FA evidence with a view to charging him legally ? or would that require someone to lodge a complaint with them ?
[quote author=Judge Jules link=topic=47188.msg1448314#msg1448314 date=1324418505]
[quote author=mark1975 link=topic=47188.msg1448306#msg1448306 date=1324418193]
The club statement is commendable and it's got balls.
The problem now is that every cunt is going to abuse this ruling, you'll get players pulling the racist card left right and centre and meanwhile the FA have now set a precedent which I doubt will be upheld for EBJT, or anyone else.
This seems to all stem from Rafa's 'rant' which was the first public questioning of the FA's bias in favour of United and Fergie, it's been a long road in which they've proven that he still has an unnerving power and influence over the English game and it's points of leadership.
As for Luis, well having a black father and having played alongside multi cultural players for years without any hint of this before, doesn't seem to hold any sway as far as the FA go, no further damning evidence has been brought forward during the enquiry and it's been magnificently timed (as only the FA could, remember Ferdinand returning from his ban against us?), to hit before the busiest and one of the most crucial period's of the season. If Luis' downfall in this is that he isn't quite as black as Evra, and ergo, must be the guilty party, then I think the FA need only look in the mirror to find the racists. As for Luis keeping Schtum on the pitch, what like Rooney? It's part of his game, his nature and his winning mentality, if you take that from him you may aswell give him a one way pass to Barcelona right now.
He's ours and he deserves the benefit of the doubt, given who the cunts are calling the shots, he deserves all the backing he gets.
[/quote]
Thundering great nail/head interface.
[/quote]
From the start of this season there has been a witch hunt against Suarez.
First the "Suarez dives and cheats" comment ended up in him getting absolutely nothing from the referees. Now this.....we need to bring the hammer real hard on this and trigger an investigation on the FA. I'm actually going to stop following football till that happens.
[quote author=mark1975 link=topic=47188.msg1448306#msg1448306 date=1324418193]
The club statement is commendable and it's got balls.
The problem now is that every cunt is going to abuse this ruling, you'll get players pulling the racist card left right and centre and meanwhile the FA have now set a precedent which I doubt will be upheld for EBJT, or anyone else.
This seems to all stem from Rafa's 'rant' which was the first public questioning of the FA's bias in favour of United and Fergie, it's been a long road in which they've proven that he still has an unnerving power and influence over the English game and it's points of leadership.
As for Luis, well having a black father and having played alongside multi cultural players for years without any hint of this before, doesn't seem to hold any sway as far as the FA go, no further damning evidence has been brought forward during the enquiry and it's been magnificently timed (as only the FA could, remember Ferdinand returning from his ban against us?), to hit before the busiest and one of the most crucial period's of the season. If Luis' downfall in this is that he isn't quite as black as Evra, and ergo, must be the guilty party, then I think the FA need only look in the mirror to find the racists. As for Luis keeping Schtum on the pitch, what like Rooney? It's part of his game, his nature and his winning mentality, if you take that from him you may aswell give him a one way pass to Barcelona right now.
He's ours and he deserves the benefit of the doubt, given who the cunts are calling the shots, he deserves all the backing he gets.
[/quote]
Thundering great nail/head interface.
[/quote]
From the start of this season there has been a witch hunt against Suarez.
First the "Suarez dives and cheats" comment ended up in him getting absolutely nothing from the referees. Now this.....we need to bring the hammer real hard on this and trigger an investigation on the FA. I'm actually going to stop following football till that happens.
[quote author=mark1975 link=topic=47188.msg1448320#msg1448320 date=1324418681]
[quote author=gene hughes link=topic=47188.msg1448316#msg1448316 date=1324418613]
[quote author=mark1975 link=topic=47188.msg1448306#msg1448306 date=1324418193]
The problem now is that every cunt is going to abuse this ruling, you'll get players pulling the racist card left right and centre [/quote]
Except ours, of course.
[/quote]
Point? I don't know where you're coming from with your posts in this thread Gene.
[/quote]
Are you also worried that our players will start falsely accusing other people of racism, or is it just people from other clubs? If it's the former that makes sense, if it's the latter, then it doesn't and I shall pursue you on the issue.
Now pick up that sword!
[quote author=gene hughes link=topic=47188.msg1448316#msg1448316 date=1324418613]
[quote author=mark1975 link=topic=47188.msg1448306#msg1448306 date=1324418193]
The problem now is that every cunt is going to abuse this ruling, you'll get players pulling the racist card left right and centre [/quote]
Except ours, of course.
[/quote]
Point? I don't know where you're coming from with your posts in this thread Gene.
[/quote]
Are you also worried that our players will start falsely accusing other people of racism, or is it just people from other clubs? If it's the former that makes sense, if it's the latter, then it doesn't and I shall pursue you on the issue.
Now pick up that sword!
Presumably the next time Evra, a notoriously irascible player, takes part in a match against LFC, an LFC player can get in a squabble with him, suddenly look outraged and later claim he said something racially abusive. The cameras and microphones would pick up nothing, but Evra would still be charged and fined. That's the madness the FA has encouraged. It's a stunningly incoherent verdict. Procedurally it's Alice in Wonderland.
[quote author=gkmacca link=topic=47188.msg1448332#msg1448332 date=1324419411]
Presumably the next time Evra, a notoriously irascible player, takes part in a match against LFC, an LFC player can get in a squabble with him, suddenly look outraged and later claim he said something racially abusive. The cameras and microphones would pick up nothing, but Evra would still be charged and fined. That's the madness the FA has encouraged. It's a stunningly incoherent verdict. Procedurally it's Alice in Wonderland.
[/quote]
I agree, if that is the case.
I don't believe it is.
Presumably the next time Evra, a notoriously irascible player, takes part in a match against LFC, an LFC player can get in a squabble with him, suddenly look outraged and later claim he said something racially abusive. The cameras and microphones would pick up nothing, but Evra would still be charged and fined. That's the madness the FA has encouraged. It's a stunningly incoherent verdict. Procedurally it's Alice in Wonderland.
[/quote]
I agree, if that is the case.
I don't believe it is.
[quote author=livvy185 link=topic=47188.msg1448317#msg1448317 date=1324418622]
[quote author=Jack D Rips link=topic=47188.msg1448312#msg1448312 date=1324418407]
[quote author=Jack D Rips link=topic=47188.msg1448287#msg1448287 date=1324417758]
Can someone tell me what rule E3(1) and E3(2) say please?
[/quote]
Anyone?
[/quote]
Rule E3 General Behaviour
3 (1) A Participant shall at all times act in the best interests of the game and shall not
act in any manner which is improper or brings the game into disrepute or use any
one, or a combination of, violent conduct, serious foul play, threatening, abusive,
indecent or insulting words or behaviour.
(2) In the event of any breach of Rule E 3(1) including a reference to any one or more
of a person’s ethnic origin, colour, race, nationality, faith, gender, sexual orientation
or disability (an “aggravating factor”), a Regulatory Commission shall consider
the imposition of an increased sanction, taking into account the following entry
points:
For a first offence, a sanction that is double that which the Regulatory Commission
would have applied had the aggravating factor not been present.
For a second offence, a sanction that is treble that which the Regulatory
Commission would have applied had the aggravating factor not been present.
Any further such offence(s) shall give rise to consideration of a permanent
suspension.
These entry points are intended to guide the Regulatory Commission and are not
mandatory.
The Regulatory Commission shall have the discretion to impose a sanction greater
or less than the entry point, according to the aggravating or mitigating factors
present in each case.
Commission would have applied had the aggravating factor not been present.
Any further such offence(s) shall give rise to consideration of a permanent
suspension.
These entry points are intended to guide the Regulatory Commission and are not
mandatory.
The Regulatory Commission shall have the discretion to impose a sanction greater
or less than the entry point, according to the aggravating or mitigating factors
present in each case.
Rule E4 covers discrimination.
[/quote]
Thanks for that Livvy.
[quote author=Jack D Rips link=topic=47188.msg1448312#msg1448312 date=1324418407]
[quote author=Jack D Rips link=topic=47188.msg1448287#msg1448287 date=1324417758]
Can someone tell me what rule E3(1) and E3(2) say please?
[/quote]
Anyone?
[/quote]
Rule E3 General Behaviour
3 (1) A Participant shall at all times act in the best interests of the game and shall not
act in any manner which is improper or brings the game into disrepute or use any
one, or a combination of, violent conduct, serious foul play, threatening, abusive,
indecent or insulting words or behaviour.
(2) In the event of any breach of Rule E 3(1) including a reference to any one or more
of a person’s ethnic origin, colour, race, nationality, faith, gender, sexual orientation
or disability (an “aggravating factor”), a Regulatory Commission shall consider
the imposition of an increased sanction, taking into account the following entry
points:
For a first offence, a sanction that is double that which the Regulatory Commission
would have applied had the aggravating factor not been present.
For a second offence, a sanction that is treble that which the Regulatory
Commission would have applied had the aggravating factor not been present.
Any further such offence(s) shall give rise to consideration of a permanent
suspension.
These entry points are intended to guide the Regulatory Commission and are not
mandatory.
The Regulatory Commission shall have the discretion to impose a sanction greater
or less than the entry point, according to the aggravating or mitigating factors
present in each case.
Commission would have applied had the aggravating factor not been present.
Any further such offence(s) shall give rise to consideration of a permanent
suspension.
These entry points are intended to guide the Regulatory Commission and are not
mandatory.
The Regulatory Commission shall have the discretion to impose a sanction greater
or less than the entry point, according to the aggravating or mitigating factors
present in each case.
Rule E4 covers discrimination.
[/quote]
Thanks for that Livvy.
[quote author=Rosco link=topic=47188.msg1448334#msg1448334 date=1324419483]
I hope we submitted this as evidence
[/quote]
In the FA world it is probably photoshoped.
I hope we submitted this as evidence
[/quote]
In the FA world it is probably photoshoped.
[quote author=5Times link=topic=47188.msg1448339#msg1448339 date=1324419685]
The FA are really overcompensating, trying to play it safe. Shite ruling , didn't even deserve a 3match ban
[/quote]
Talking about kicking down people from behind with no other intention, while a bit upset about your criminal father?
The FA are really overcompensating, trying to play it safe. Shite ruling , didn't even deserve a 3match ban
[/quote]
Talking about kicking down people from behind with no other intention, while a bit upset about your criminal father?
[quote author=gene hughes link=topic=47188.msg1448330#msg1448330 date=1324419160]
[quote author=mark1975 link=topic=47188.msg1448320#msg1448320 date=1324418681]
[quote author=gene hughes link=topic=47188.msg1448316#msg1448316 date=1324418613]
[quote author=mark1975 link=topic=47188.msg1448306#msg1448306 date=1324418193]
The problem now is that every cunt is going to abuse this ruling, you'll get players pulling the racist card left right and centre [/quote]
Except ours, of course.
[/quote]
Point? I don't know where you're coming from with your posts in this thread Gene.
[/quote]
Are you also worried that our players will start falsely accusing other people of racism, or is it just people from other clubs? If it's the former that makes sense, if it's the latter, then it doesn't and I shall pursue you on the issue.
Now pick up that sword!
[/quote]
So it's ok for me to assume that EVERYONE will do it, but not ok to just assume that players of other clubs will do it? If the constant cheating and abuse of the rules from United is anything to go by, then I've got every reason to suspect the latter. Soz, if that's just me being paranoid though and creating conspiracy theories.
I'd like to think we've got a bit more about us in that respect. Who'd do it? Johnson? Suarez? Charlie Adam?! At the high end of the game there's a few cunts I could see doing it, one of them has seemingly just done it, again. If it's such a high profile offence, like anything in the game with a severe punishment, another player is bound to jump on it at some point.
[quote author=mark1975 link=topic=47188.msg1448320#msg1448320 date=1324418681]
[quote author=gene hughes link=topic=47188.msg1448316#msg1448316 date=1324418613]
[quote author=mark1975 link=topic=47188.msg1448306#msg1448306 date=1324418193]
The problem now is that every cunt is going to abuse this ruling, you'll get players pulling the racist card left right and centre [/quote]
Except ours, of course.
[/quote]
Point? I don't know where you're coming from with your posts in this thread Gene.
[/quote]
Are you also worried that our players will start falsely accusing other people of racism, or is it just people from other clubs? If it's the former that makes sense, if it's the latter, then it doesn't and I shall pursue you on the issue.
Now pick up that sword!
[/quote]
So it's ok for me to assume that EVERYONE will do it, but not ok to just assume that players of other clubs will do it? If the constant cheating and abuse of the rules from United is anything to go by, then I've got every reason to suspect the latter. Soz, if that's just me being paranoid though and creating conspiracy theories.
I'd like to think we've got a bit more about us in that respect. Who'd do it? Johnson? Suarez? Charlie Adam?! At the high end of the game there's a few cunts I could see doing it, one of them has seemingly just done it, again. If it's such a high profile offence, like anything in the game with a severe punishment, another player is bound to jump on it at some point.
S
Squiggles
Guest
[quote author=Rosco link=topic=47188.msg1448334#msg1448334 date=1324419483]
I hope we submitted this as evidence
[/quote]
Hahahaha
I hope we submitted this as evidence
[/quote]
Hahahaha
[quote author=Insignificance link=topic=47188.msg1448340#msg1448340 date=1324419795]
[quote author=5Times link=topic=47188.msg1448339#msg1448339 date=1324419685]
The FA are really overcompensating, trying to play it safe. Shite ruling , didn't even deserve a 3match ban
[/quote]
Talking about kicking down people from behind with no other intention, while a bit upset about your criminal father?
[/quote]
Heh, fair point.
Can Suarez say he was upset about something??
[quote author=5Times link=topic=47188.msg1448339#msg1448339 date=1324419685]
The FA are really overcompensating, trying to play it safe. Shite ruling , didn't even deserve a 3match ban
[/quote]
Talking about kicking down people from behind with no other intention, while a bit upset about your criminal father?
[/quote]
Heh, fair point.
Can Suarez say he was upset about something??
S
Squiggles
Guest
I love how our defence was 'He's got a black friend!'.
It's often how racists defend themselves afterwards.
It's often how racists defend themselves afterwards.
[quote author=gene hughes link=topic=47188.msg1448298#msg1448298 date=1324417971]
[quote author=LadyRed link=topic=47188.msg1448293#msg1448293 date=1324417883]
I don't know Gerry, maybe it's because we all have different lines as to what we think it acceptable when it comes to racism.
[/quote]
Ladyred, I'm way behind in poster of the year votes so while I'm dishing out insults, I have to say that even in the past your views on what constitutes racism have struck me as rather parochial.
[/quote]
Like I said, it's something we all have different lines on.
[quote author=LadyRed link=topic=47188.msg1448293#msg1448293 date=1324417883]
I don't know Gerry, maybe it's because we all have different lines as to what we think it acceptable when it comes to racism.
[/quote]
Ladyred, I'm way behind in poster of the year votes so while I'm dishing out insults, I have to say that even in the past your views on what constitutes racism have struck me as rather parochial.
[/quote]
Like I said, it's something we all have different lines on.
@TrendsLiverpool Trendsmap Liverpool
'appeal', 'evidence', #fuckthefa & #evraisagrass are now trending in #Liverpool trendsmap.com/gb/liverpool
'appeal', 'evidence', #fuckthefa & #evraisagrass are now trending in #Liverpool trendsmap.com/gb/liverpool
Similar threads
-
- Locked
