That's a great statement.
I hope the people who've taken the stance of 'guilty' from the off, or those who've adopted a smug air of glee from watching this unfold (as most predicted it UNFAIRLY would) will take a step back and have a look at how much of a shambles the handling of this case has been, how unjust it has been and how it's typified the FA's tendency to be lenient on, and in some cases be biased in support of Manchester United.
It's not a conspiracy theory, there are enough incidents over the last few years which leave a lot to contemplate and be angry about in that regard. And it's funny how some of the posters who are siding with the 'beyond reasonable doubt' line of thinking, then have the gall to accuse others being over sensitive about the varying treatment of different clubs in the game.
Let's hope we win tonight, but in truth, some posters have really left me shaking my head in disbelief throughout this thread. What a fucking car crash.
The judgement isn't a solid one, it's a well rehearsed, well researched and blatant threat at any sort of appeal. When there was little evidence to go on in the first place and the FA have been happy to convict based on assumptions, it's pointless fighting an enquiry that was already predicted to be corrupt from the off, as was mentioned by the few of us with a hint of common sense.