The not confirmed, it's really only a rumour transfer thread ;Summer 2012
- Thread starter the count
- Start date
- Latest activity Latest activity:
- Status
Without being overdramatic here, i'd be very close to tears if that deal happened.
You mean like we were shafted with Aqua ?
I actually think the power resides with the buying club not the seller in cases of loans turning into permanent transfers.
People still haven't realised that we just don't have that much cash to splash around and loan deals for what would be expensive players to buy, where we are paying only the salary, and not for the pleasure of the loan, are perfect for us at this moment in time.
I don't think that would apply with City, they don't have to give a fuck. If we take him for a year, he does well and we want him and he wants to sign, City are a position to do what the fuck they like and not have to particularly just get what they can for him, they can hold out for what they want, and if he's done well for us, then that could spark a bidding war.
True. But even they (and especially if the player himself hands in a transfer request) will want to get rid if they have no future use for him. As far as we are concerned, great if we can get him for a decent price, if not we can just move on - exactly as per Aqua.
No it wouldn't. I'd guess our valuation of Agger would be in the region of £25 mill, besides which they're getting f'ck all out of Johnson as it is and would be saving on his wages.
I'd imagine Johnson will be on relatively big wages though, so ideally for us I could see us taking him but having City subsidise his wages, which would then, for the benefit of City, take a chunk off the fee. My reading of that earlier article is that we want £22m, City have offered £18m, so are prepared to use Johnson as a makeweight.
Either that or we're getting him on a permanent deal, which would mean as far as the fee for Johnson goes, on paper at least, we're getting a bargain. We're just losing a fucking good player in the process.
Fucking mental, that.
Manchester City take UAE Olympics star Omar Abdulrahman on trial
Why didn't we do this? He was amazing during the Olympics.
View: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YvRDvMS_Zoo&feature=player_detailpage
free???? for fuck's sake i hate us.
I don't see City losing £10 Million on a trialist.
Hes no Dempsey.
if you took the 'van' from van persie and gave it to dempsey then everyone would prefer dempsey.
He also looks just like David Luiz. I agree, thought he looked very erratic. I'd imagine this trial at City has got much more to do with them being owned by the royal family of one of the emirates than any remote possibility of him ever actually playing a game for them.
Because if Dempsey had a van he'd be delivering cooked sausages around the streets of York.
if we sign dempsey it'll be like having ben affleck playing for us or something.
- Status
Similar threads
-
- Locked
- Locked
