• You may have to login or register before you can post and view our exclusive members only forums.
    To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

So how is this all gonna play out?

Status
Not open for further replies.
I said a few weeks ago that another couple of bad results and the majority of us would want him gone, and if things carried on he'd be gone by January. I'll stand by that I think. These things have a momentum to them that negates common sense. I think the urge to sack him will be too much for FSG regardless of the problem of an adequate replacement.
 
I 'think' Rodgers will get to the end of the season. Although if we were to lose in the next 2 games I could defo see them pulling the plug as the season is lost anyway so they've nothing to lose apart from his payoff.
I can't see this problem ever resolving itself whilst Rodgers is in charge. He's a good guy and a good manager, and wants to play attacking football, but the system he wants to deploy doesn't include defending and we'll be forever found out/countered because of this.
If Rodgers could sort a defence out, get a coach in that could sort it out, or tweak the system so it included defending, we'd probably be laughing, but it's never gonna happen.

This.
 
I think there is a distinct possibility we could lose to both Bournemouth and the Arse in the next two games.
 
Done by Bournmouth and Arsenal. Sacked!
And if he isn't, he will be come feb/mar when we are involved in a relegation fight.
 
I don't think they will pull the plug mid season, if only because their targeted replacements won't be available. I can see them imposing a DOF on him if results improve and he is here next season, unless we qualify for the massively enhanced riches of the champions league he will not be in a position in which he could refuse this. They will not be showering him in cash either - loans only in the window.
 
Firstly, we should definitely sign Reus.

How's it going to pan out? Well we'll lose to Arsenal and Brendan will get the boot, we won't do much in January, maybe sign a 8-10million striker or Origi, nothing big, nothing out. We'll improve under our caretaker / new manager, as will players like Lovren, but nothing drastic (think Tim Sherwood at Spurs). We'll end up coming fifth in the league, thinking we've got a late charge for fourth, but never really being in the hunt. As for the Europa, we'll make either the quarter or semi finals, being knocked out by a Portuguese or Spanish team.

Depressing.
Pretty much.
 
I think this week is a very big week, if we are eliminated from a cup competition by underdogs and beaten at home by a rival I think the momentum to change will be unstoppable.

There are 5 games between now and the transfer window opening, 3 home/2 away if we are unbeaten during that time I think he will be allowed to continue and will get money. If we fail to get more than a few points I think he'll be replaced.

Sad to say, the club I started supporting all those years ago when it was an institution is now very much a business with all the pressures for constant results and individual performance that brings. It used to be nurture, now it's nature: instant progression or you get the hook.
 
I find it hard to see him getting the boot before the summer. It's very easy to get caught up in the whole he's got X many games to save his job fever on the forums but has there been anything in the media about FSG looking to get rid? I know Macca has said that they've probably sounded some people out but that doesn't necessarily mean they're ready to pull the trigger right now.

It is hard to escape the feeling that he's a dead man walking at the moment what with the results, the silly comments, the mad decisions and all that, but who would see us through to the summer if he were go?
 
They'd put King Kenny in as an interim, I don't have doubt about that.... I dont think he burnt his bridges and you know the fans still love him no matter what.
 
I wouldn't want them to give him any money though.. they brought him back as an ambassador didn't they?
 
I hope he tells them to feck off after how they acted. There aren't any obvious options out there, unless they bring in an old manager with no great desire to make the job permanent, like Toshack (who is sometimes consulted by Henry), and invite either Gerrard or Danny Murphy to assist as a means of acquiring experience. But that would surely be a lot of disruption for no real purpose. They'd be much better advised to support Rodgers until the summer.

Look at the realistic options among 'resting' managers: Pulis, thank god, wouldn't agree to be a caretaker; Martin Jol, likewise; Chris Hughton, possibly but he's neither a safe pair of hands nor a positive coach; Hoddle - he's re-learnt how to talk a good game but has had minimal impact at QPR; then there are the deadbeats like Curbishley, and the oddballs like Di Canio. Chilling stuff.

Then look at the ex-Reds: Thommo - did okay steadying the ship as caretaker but surely long past consideration; Barnes - after Tranmere surely unemployable; Murphy - keen but completely untested; Bellamy - in some ways he's just what is needed among the current backroom staff (he'd demand greater commitment, and wouldn't be afraid of telling Gerrard to sort himself out), and as he's a Rodgers fan the manager would be wise to consider adding him pronto, but again completely untested as a stand-in boss; Toshack - twice-passed over for the job in the past, now probably content to play a cameo role, but another who is well past his prime; Keegan - well we all know what would happen. Again, a depressing bunch.

Steve Clarke would probably be the least unlikely short term choice, but he wasn't much better organising the defence the last time he was here, and he's not going to lift the mood with the force of his personality.

Rodgers looks better for the short term at least the more you look at the alternatives.
 
I hope he tells them to feck off after how they acted. There aren't any obvious options out there, unless they bring in an old manager with no great desire to make the job permanent, like Toshack (who is sometimes consulted by Henry), and invite either Gerrard or Danny Murphy to assist as a means of acquiring experience. But that would surely be a lot of disruption for no real purpose. They'd be much better advised to support Rodgers until the summer.

Look at the realistic options among 'resting' managers: Pulis, thank god, wouldn't agree to be a caretaker; Martin Jol, likewise; Chris Hughton, possibly but he's neither a safe pair of hands nor a positive coach; Hoddle - he's re-learnt how to talk a good game but has had minimal impact at QPR; then there are the deadbeats like Curbishley, and the oddballs like Di Canio. Chilling stuff.

Then look at the ex-Reds: Thommo - did okay steadying the ship as caretaker but surely long past consideration; Barnes - after Tranmere surely unemployable; Murphy - keen but completely untested; Bellamy - in some ways he's just what is needed among the current backroom staff (he'd demand greater commitment, and wouldn't be afraid of telling Gerrard to sort himself out), and as he's a Rodgers fan the manager would be wise to consider adding him pronto, but again completely untested as a stand-in boss; Toshack - twice-passed over for the job in the past, now probably content to play a cameo role, but another who is well past his prime; Keegan - well we all know what would happen. Again, a depressing bunch.

Steve Clarke would probably be the least unlikely short term choice, but he wasn't much better organising the defence the last time he was here, and he's not going to lift the mood with the force of his personality.

Rodgers looks better for the short term at least the more you look at the alternatives.


They might try to force Rodgers to accept a director of football. Tell him to accept it or walk.

They've followed the same model as Spurs quite a few times now, and the Santini / Arnesen "partnership" is one they haven't been able to try yet.
 
I hope he tells them to feck off after how they acted. There aren't any obvious options out there, unless they bring in an old manager with no great desire to make the job permanent, like Toshack (who is sometimes consulted by Henry), and invite either Gerrard or Danny Murphy to assist as a means of acquiring experience. But that would surely be a lot of disruption for no real purpose. They'd be much better advised to support Rodgers until the summer.

Look at the realistic options among 'resting' managers: Pulis, thank god, wouldn't agree to be a caretaker; Martin Jol, likewise; Chris Hughton, possibly but he's neither a safe pair of hands nor a positive coach; Hoddle - he's re-learnt how to talk a good game but has had minimal impact at QPR; then there are the deadbeats like Curbishley, and the oddballs like Di Canio. Chilling stuff.

Then look at the ex-Reds: Thommo - did okay steadying the ship as caretaker but surely long past consideration; Barnes - after Tranmere surely unemployable; Murphy - keen but completely untested; Bellamy - in some ways he's just what is needed among the current backroom staff (he'd demand greater commitment, and wouldn't be afraid of telling Gerrard to sort himself out), and as he's a Rodgers fan the manager would be wise to consider adding him pronto, but again completely untested as a stand-in boss; Toshack - twice-passed over for the job in the past, now probably content to play a cameo role, but another who is well past his prime; Keegan - well we all know what would happen. Again, a depressing bunch.

Steve Clarke would probably be the least unlikely short term choice, but he wasn't much better organising the defence the last time he was here, and he's not going to lift the mood with the force of his personality.

Rodgers looks better for the short term at least the more you look at the alternatives.

That's pretty much what I've been thinking. The lack of alternatives mid season will give him more time.
If we want a top manager to replace him then it will be after the season ends.
I doubt De Boer will leave Ajax in January.
 
They've followed the same model as Spurs quite a few times now, and the Santini / Arnesen "partnership" is one they haven't been able to try yet.



That's what baffles me - why would any sane person want to follow the Spurs model? Not even Spurs fans want to follow the Spurs model.
 
That's what baffles me - why would any sane person want to follow the Spurs model? Not even Spurs fans want to follow the Spurs model.

alan-partridge-shrug-o.gif


Beats me
 
What examples can you think of where managers have done really well at the top level, then failed and got sacked and turned out to be useless all along? O'leary?
 
I hope he tells them to feck off after how they acted. There aren't any obvious options out there, unless they bring in an old manager with no great desire to make the job permanent, like Toshack (who is sometimes consulted by Henry), and invite either Gerrard or Danny Murphy to assist as a means of acquiring experience. But that would surely be a lot of disruption for no real purpose. They'd be much better advised to support Rodgers until the summer.

Look at the realistic options among 'resting' managers: Pulis, thank god, wouldn't agree to be a caretaker; Martin Jol, likewise; Chris Hughton, possibly but he's neither a safe pair of hands nor a positive coach; Hoddle - he's re-learnt how to talk a good game but has had minimal impact at QPR; then there are the deadbeats like Curbishley, and the oddballs like Di Canio. Chilling stuff.

Then look at the ex-Reds: Thommo - did okay steadying the ship as caretaker but surely long past consideration; Barnes - after Tranmere surely unemployable; Murphy - keen but completely untested; Bellamy - in some ways he's just what is needed among the current backroom staff (he'd demand greater commitment, and wouldn't be afraid of telling Gerrard to sort himself out), and as he's a Rodgers fan the manager would be wise to consider adding him pronto, but again completely untested as a stand-in boss; Toshack - twice-passed over for the job in the past, now probably content to play a cameo role, but another who is well past his prime; Keegan - well we all know what would happen. Again, a depressing bunch.

Steve Clarke would probably be the least unlikely short term choice, but he wasn't much better organising the defence the last time he was here, and he's not going to lift the mood with the force of his personality.

Rodgers looks better for the short term at least the more you look at the alternatives.

Did you not rate Clarke's coaching when he was with us, macca? It seemed to produce results when the King was still caretaking.

P.S.Just heard on the radio that he's been appointed Reading manager anyway.
 
I don't quite know what to think. He started well but by the last season he seemed to have run out of ideas.
 
I wander when Rodger is inevitably sacked, where will he manage next? ..

I do hope he does not disappear into the obscurity of the Championship and lower leagues.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom